I treated myself to a large TV. In order to store a dozen movies on a flash drive with less than 128GB of space, I also made the decision to do so. Check it out for yourself here. Instead of the claimed 128GB, there are 112GB. Those. 17GB fewer! S. Ka I just can't say anything. I paid 1500 for it, however cooling and an external hard drive might improve performance. And yes, I am aware that the declared memory is always higher than the actual memory. however not 15%?

After a couple of months, it began to be recognized for a very long time and read / write very slowly. It is impossible to use the patience is not enough. The first time Transcend was so surprised.

Yuzal model for 128 Gb. In general, all this time I was satisfied. Convenient, reliable (as it seemed to me), did not fail. Write speeds through the USB 3.0 ports were good. Large files were written and read quickly. The reason for the failure, apparently, is the too frequent rewriting of a large file (5 GB in the form of an encrypted container, which was picked up like a separate disk, and with every minute of use it was completely overwritten approximately 100-200 times a day in total and…

Some advantages: This company's old flash drive, which had been used for around ten years and worked without fail throughout that time, was misplaced. The brand new one is identical to the old one. After two months of use, the flash drive failed completely. Recording one megabyte takes one whole hour.

required to produce a flash disk that is bootable. It's a wonderful deal for the money considering how little I actually use it. Another, more durable one with a metal rotational protection mechanism is the one I use for my day-to-day activities.

Although the speed is a little lower than what was anticipated, it is roughly comparable to that of the other students in terms of cost. Not only does USB 3.0 exist on paper, but the speed of data transfer through this connector is two to two and a half times faster. Please find attached a screenshot of the tests. Because it was just recently purchased, reliability cannot yet be evaluated. Perhaps I'll include it at a later time. I was under the impression that it would be far less expensive…

The dimensions of the flash drive are 63.6 millimeters by 21.2 millimeters by 10.6 millimeters; it has been in use since November 2022 and functions normally. Bought as a replacement for a SanDisk Ultra Dual USB Drive 3.0 due to the SanDisk brand's notoriously sluggish writing speed. Buying is something I highly encourage doing. In addition, the price went down to 1450 in November of 2022, having been 2022 initially. as of August 2022, it was 2022. Various advantages: Read/write speed; LED…

It has already justified its price many times, I go with it to work as a computer master, all the software that you need is always placed under hand, helps out in any situation, of course, it would be absolutely ideal 256gb for capturing images directly on it with acrobat.

What a monstrous being! I was caught off guard when I bought version 3.1 and put it into a USB 3.1 port because I had no idea this would happen. I was able to record a video that was 2.5 gigabytes in size in just forty seconds, which is equivalent to around sixty megabits per second. From a flash drive to a computer again in 6.5 seconds, I didn't even have time to determine the speed, but I leaped under 1-2 gigabytes per second! I have no idea how it will act in the future, but so now I'm as…

Has pros: It has been determined that a flash drive cannot be folded unintentionally under any circumstances. It's quite cool. There is no reason to be concerned about this at all. The reliability of the brand is excellent, and the pace is really satisfying. Some disadvantages include the fact that the flash drive would not have a cost if one could feel more confident using plastic.

The pluses: This item was acquired via the Internet. Blister is still unbroken. The messenger service was prompt. Against it: It turns out that the 128GB flash drive was just 107GB in size. What was so unexpected

It seems to me that real copying is superior to any artificial tests that might be conducted. Windows NTFS. When recording with USB 2.0 on the front panel of a computer with an HDD Sata movie of 5.5 GB, the process takes four minutes, of which one minute is spent on copy completion (the copy window stalls, and the flash drive flashes). The final speed was 29 MB/s. To transfer a 5.8 GB movie from the same drive using the USB 3.0 port on the back of the computer takes two minutes and fifteen…

CrystalDiskMark reports a write speed of 50 MB, but in reality, no matter how many times I try to write things to this flash drive, there is no speed even close to that. It oscillates all the time between 0 and 30, and waves like that are recorded all the time. As a direct consequence of this, we may achieve a maximum speed of 10 megabytes per second when linked to a USB3.0 port. The following are some of the advantages: there is no indicator, the speed is modest, and there are no other…

Today, I decided to purchase and download the CristalDiskMark utility. The reading speed is 32 megabytes per second, while the write speed ranges from 8 to 18 megabytes per second. I believe that this speed is low and remains unstable because it jumps straight. A movie that is 1.45 gigabytes in size can be copied in a few minutes.

I use the other two every day and they are faultless. I purchased 3 pieces more than a year ago: 32.64 and 128 GB, the first one is with a backup copy of Windows, so I can't speak about reliability. Different pros: till they die) the recording speed, as stated on the packaging, occasionally drops, but it's not a deal-breaker (throwing films that are 10 to 30 GB each, the USB 3.0 recording speed after 5 minutes averages 37 mb/s, which is fine for me) Cons: The exit mechanism is a complete…

What kind of chaffing (covertly, of course; they won't be informed of this in any way) went into this improvement? And in general, how will it function in the future, considering it's a wonder of Chinese thought.? My memory of Transend as a company is hazy at best. No one can or should trust one another. The 780th version also appeared in his dreams. kapets. features advantages: My wife and I watched a lot of movies on the same Transcend JetFlash 790 64Gb flash drive I bought for her three…

The flash drive's design appealed to me, and I like how smoothly and cleanly the expansion mechanism functioned. According to the reviews, "dangling" is fine because of the convenient retractable mechanism, etc. When I attempted to toss some films, things went very badly. Size 112.00 square inches or 292022 GB The flash drive comes with a 5-year warranty, while the store's website advertises a 10-year warranty.

I've had the 16 GB model for a whole year now. I maintain a repository of active documents in a variety of forms. A large number of little files occupy up a third of the flash disk. The flash drive has been used without incident. The sliding mechanism performed admirably throughout its operation. The damaged flash drive now works perfectly. When it comes to 4-ku, I find that Sandisk's sliding mechanism is the gold standard. I would suggest it generally.

To clone a virtual system with a 20GB HDD from a computer using USB2, I use huge flash drives. The process takes 4 minutes to complete when using Silicon Power to copy archives to a USB flash drive while simultaneously archiving with a Rar profile (high-speed archiving, split into 150 MB volumes), and 6 minutes while using Transcend. Both flash drives have the same feature, but are 2 times faster on a device with USB 3.

I purchased two of them, so the issues that are described here are not due to the fact that two instances of the same thing were married; rather, they are due to the absence of either the model itself or a separate batch of flash drives. The maximum recording speed for USB 3.0 is 30 megabytes per second, and it never goes over that. In addition to this, it oscillates rapidly, taking the form of a high-frequency sinusoid on the graph (0-20-30-20-0-pause for a few seconds-again in a circular…