Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
jacob evans photo
london
1 Level
59 Review
1428 Karma

Review on Qtum by jacob evans

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Qtum

In my opinion, NEO, EOS and QTUM projects are similar to each other and pursue the same goal, which is why there is a lot of competition between them and they all try to upgrade their blockchains.
Ethereum's main goal was to be a blockchain whose smart contracts on the network led to the development of blockchain, and it has been successful in this regard. QTUM has the same goal, and based on my research on this project, they are also focusing on a blockchain currency.
QTUM uses the PoS protocol, which is great for a blockchain on which smart contracts can be created (ethereum uses PoW). qtum is targeting the mobile application market, and I think choosing a segment to focus on their apps is something that can set it apart from eos and neo.

ο»Ώ

Pros
  • Competing with similar projects has led everyone to strive to improve their networks
  • Selecting a precise goal (development of decentralized applications in mobile application)
Cons
  • Currently, CoinMarketCap is weaker than its competitors in terms of ranking

Similar reviews