Review on Laser level BOSCH GLL 3-80 Professional (0601063S00) by Mateusz Grzesiak (M ᠌

Name: Laser level BOSCH GLL 3-80 Professional (0601063S00)
Item: Laser level BOSCH GLL 3-80 Professional (0601063S00)
Rating: 5

May 26, 2023

The best product, from those that I have viewed, I advise everyone!

I myself once exploited it as a level in large prom. indoors, checked at a distance of about 60 m with a conventional optical-mechanical level, the error was about 5 mm on the shoulder of 60 m, which is quite acceptable.
And now I was honored to disassemble it (they asked me to repair it) The fattest plus that I would note is its strength, I repaired this level after it fell in working condition from the height of the second floor directly onto the paving slabs. I was surprised that even though the front window was broken into rubbish, the front reflecting prism was damaged (orthogonality was broken), but the other two planes remained working! How so? Fall from such a height onto concrete and stay in the ranks!? In general, the fact remains. How did I check it, you ask? I am a surveyor and will tell everyone how easy it is to do. Write response comments if anyone needs.

Pros

Durability, convenience, functionality.

Cons

There is only one drawback, with very frequent use, the seal on the movable part of the shutter for switching on and fixing the pendulum sometimes bites the cuff and wedges this shutter itself, as well as the bottom of the battery compartment can is not airtight and when leaving, for example, acid batteries for a long time, the electrolyte which is often one of these the batteries leak out, get straight to the power control board (you can see it in the photo of the opened patient). But I would not attribute this to shortcomings, but simply as a kind of nuance for those who think that the equipment does not need to be monitored, although it is written everywhere in the passport for such devices with batteries that the batteries must be removed for long-term storage. Yes, and at a long distance the beam is fat, but the instructions again say that for long distances it is recommended to use a receiver that fully compensates for this drawback. In general, it has almost no serious shortcomings.