Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Kiril Veronikov ᠌ photo
1 Level
248 Review
0 Karma

Review on Smartphone Apple iPhone 7 32 GB, 1 SIM, black by Kiril Veronikov ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the quality is good and the price is reasonable.

1. I'm not bothered by the lack of a 3.5 jack. I just use Bluetooth to listen to music in the car. There cannot possibly be a problem with charging the phone while using headphones to listen to music, but I do not see this as a drawback. 2. The Samsung Galaxy S7 still has more interesting pictures. 3. Batteries. The phone operates quietly enough for a day with highly active use. I charge it every two days while using a more or less measured mode. Four. 3D touch. Although I rarely use it, it's cool. 5. The phone functions properly in cold weather; I used it all winter. There have been no unintentional shutdowns, regular behavior for the battery charge level, and no leaps. If the charge level was lower than 50%, the Iphone 5 would continuously shut off. It might display 5% from 50% for 5 minutes spent outside in a -5C environment, or it might just switch off. With 7, there are no such issues. I am generally happy with the phone. It meets all of my needs. Fortunately or sadly, I no longer consider devices running Android OS after switching from Android to IOS. I'd give the iPhone 7 a 4.5 overall rating. Since there is no option to provide such a rating, I gave the phone a 4 because, in my opinion, it cannot receive a 5 due to its shortcomings. I hope my analysis was useful. We appreciate your time. All the best with your purchasing!

Pros
  • 1. Presentation. Everything is clearly adjusted, there are no assembly-related problems, all materials are of great quality, and holding the item in your hands is enjoyable. If any fingerprints are left on my black matte iPhone, they are not noticeable. Compared to the 6/6S in Space Gray, I think it looks lot more intriguing in this hue. 2. Showcase. The touchscreen on smartphones is, in my opinion, the best. I use the gadget without a film because the oleophobic coating is of good quality, and fingerprints on the screen are hardly noticeable. The image is of good quality; refer to comment (2). 3. Sound. The sound quality of stereo speakers is far better than that of the iPhone 6 and Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge at any volume level. The sound is luscious, voluminous, and basses are there when I use my native EarPods Lighting headphones, which I had to do several times. I give the sound a total of 5 stars. 4. Execution. I'm unable to comment because I don't play games. In general, you can transition between a variety of open applications, browser tabs, and other programs with a lag time of less than 0.5 seconds. No application slows down concurrently. For me personally, this is a sign—5 months of operation without a single slowdown, reboot, or freeze. I rate the 5. Camera as excellent. I think they are amazing for a smartphone, especially for the front camera, which is the most important one. There are a few little noises in low light, but I'm worried that any smartphone will have them. The photos are of excellent quality, and the stabilization when recording video works well. I made no comparisons with other models, but both cameras are perfect for me.
Cons
  • One is Touch ID. In the end, it performs admirably. However, you must manually enter the password if the finger is just a little damp—not wet, just wet—so I will classify this as a drawback. 2. A sound-emitting device with a high frequency. The phone was switched out for a brand-new one for me in the C/C; both were PCT. This high-pitched squeal is also present on the new one. Of course, you won't hear anything if you use the phone normally and don't listen to it by holding it up to your ear. However, I believe that obtrusive sounds are inappropriate in a phone for 50,000 people. By the way, I didn't hear any of these sounds on the Plus version. 3. Price. In October 2022, it cost me 57,000 dollars; today, a comparable equipment from Europe can be purchased for 42,000 dollars.