AMD 100 100000158BOX 6 Core Desktop Processor Review

With its pros: Fast delivery. Possibility to pay partially "Thank you from Amazon". Different cons: The processor was delivered with 3 bent legs. However, after straightening them, it works fine. Overclocked to 420226 GHz at 1.256 VCore.

Personal feedback on the product.Has pros: The store halfway requested a refund, just doomed Cons: The store halfway requested a refund, just doomed

Excellent percent. Has pros: Price. The product corresponds to the declared characteristics. Got cons: The sticker is stuck on the surface of the processor (the problem is to peel it off)

The percentage is enough for all the tasks of the game editing in Vegas, the documents are shorter, I'm happy with the purchase to upgrade to something faster, it doesn't make sense, who the hell knows what year.

If you do not go into details, a great option for home and office. If you're being naughty, that is, Ryzen 2600, there are 12 threads versus 6 in 3500. There is Ryzen 3500X, level 3 cache of 12 megabytes versus 6 in 3500. All these troubles, which is a little faster, which is a little more powerful, become irrelevant when a new clumsy Windows ate makes your new computer old junk. I recommend to purchase undemanding users.

Worth your money. Has pros: Naturally low heat dissipation, idle 29-35g, performance for a simple user and a gamer for the eyes. Do not forget that information about downtime is most reliable in the BIOS, in Windows the temperature is often too high by 10g. Cons: In principle, no, those who are used to driving processors, this will upset the stone, so they will be able to squeeze out no more than plus 200 MHz from the regular peak of 4.2 GHz for stable operation.

To avoid confusion: Ryzen 3500 OEM review. The Deepcool GAMMAXX 300 cooler copes without problems, however, the idle temperature is from 40 degrees and above. (It is recommended to install a 130 W cooler). I always considered a decrease in the technical process, as an axiom, to lead to less heating. But not in the case of 7 nm. I changed my 4 core i5 3470. I expected an increase of 40-60%. Got x2.25 (+125% in 3dMark physics tests). However, the processor is new and you need to periodically ate

now it is difficult for me to evaluate the price-quality ratio, because the prices are simply unimaginable, I bought this processor for 11k. Now there is a game that has not been optimized lately - fortnite, in it, during the game, I have had a lot of friezes over the past month. the video card is 2060, and the game is loaded by 50%, and the processor is fully loaded at this time (~ 80% on all cores), which is why the fps drops every three seconds from 160 to 0

If you need a processor for gaming and everyday tasks, but the budget is not very large, this is definitely your choice. I took the oem version, since I don’t think there is much sense from a regular cooler. I repeat: the processor met my expectations completely. With its pros: Performance for games and everyday tasks in conjunction with the RX 590 and 16GB of RAM is enough for me personally. Has cons: There are no complaints about the processor. Fully justified expectations. There are problems

Has pros: New "people's" processor. Ryzen 5 3600 has become too expensive for the "people's" assembly Some cons: The price is still great. Does not correspond to the actual value of the goods

Before that was Phenom 2 955 BE (4 GHz overclocking). The difference in performance is an abyss, all games run at the highest settings (Radeon 570 8 GB, 32 GB DDR4). Temperature from 36 to 55 degrees. For a long time I rushed about choosing between Ryzen 5 2600, Ryzen 7 2700, Ryzen 5 3600 - I looked at a lot of tests (for example, on youtube) - the difference between 3600 is about 1-2%, but Ryzen 5 3500 is faster than Ryzen 5 2600 in games by 25-30% , in video encoding and photo-video editing…

Its pros: The processor is very powerful for its money and in its class, after my dual core this heaven and earth Some cons: I heard that all AMD processors need good cooling, but I have a boxed one and it copes with everything

I bought for games, and not for experiments with overclocking, tests and competitions for the best pipe, and was not disappointed. Now there is an opportunity to compare with 3600, in games the advantages are negligible with 3500, and the price is higher by a third. In rendering, the cut streams of 3500 will certainly have an effect, but there is another machine for these purposes, and 3600 will not be the best choice.

6 cores at the moment and the next few are enough. I see no reason to overpay for extra cores and threads, due to the rapid obsolescence of modern processor architectures.

in general, the percent suits me more than enough, it will last for 5 years at least, I think it can be overclocked, an excellent solution for a productive computer