📺 BN59-01241A Replacement Remote for Samsung TV Models UN49KS8000F, UN49KS8500F, UN65KS8000FXZA, UN65KS8500FXZA, UN65KS9000F, UN65KS9500F, UN75KS9000F Review

The buttons on the original Samsung remote control began to fail. I had to press very hard to get them to register. It has the same form factor as Samsung's original remote but has raised buttons. A bit strange at first, but after a while I find it better than the original. Installation couldn't be easier! Just put batteries in and it works. Zero programming with my KS8000. It's way better than the Samsung replacement. Even if that fails within a year, you can buy plenty of these before hitting

Except for a few features, works well with UN65KS8000FXZA. Since it is IR and not Bluetooth, the voice function does not work, the controls must be pointed at the TV and the "Turn on now" selection function on the TV does not work. None of these things bother; In fact, I like the fact that the remote control isn't Bluetooth, as accidental button presses don't affect the TV. The buttons on the remote are raised and padded and are actually buttons rather than the smooth buttons on the originals…

I forgot to put my TV remotes away the day before I left the house, so I came home with a few chewed remotes! Back then, I didn't watch YouTube or Netflix on TV apps that much. After my shoulder surgery I lay on the couch and watched TV for a while, so the remote started to annoy me. I searched on Revain and found the Samsung version. was much more than I was willing to pay. This one popped up, so I took a chance. When it arrived I just plugged it into the TV and so far all functions have…

I was pleasantly surprised when I bought this remote and it worked right away. There was no programming, absolutely nothing. All you have to do is insert batteries and you're good to go. I had this remote instead of the one on my Samsung UN60KS8000 that came with the TV, the back button wouldn't press so I bought this and the problem was solved. I think the buttons on this design are better. The only downside to the remote is that the battery compartment is difficult to open and it doesn't have

This review is for"New BN59-01241A Replaced Remote fit for Samsung TV UN49KS8000F UN49KS8000FXZA UN49KS8500F UN65KS8000FXZA UN65KS8500F UN65KS8500FXZA UN65KS9000F UN65KS9000FXZA UN65KS9500F UN65KS9500FXZA UN75KS9000F I'm sorry to write this negative review but as many reviewers have said this remote cannot be opened to put batteries in. After considerable effort I was able to open the remote but I'm not sure I'll be able to use it again can do when I need to put in new batteries, this problem…

This review is for"New BN59-01241A Replaced Remote fit for Samsung TV UN49KS8000F UN49KS8000FXZA UN49KS8500F UN65KS8000FXZA UN65KS8500F UN65KS8500FXZA UN65KS9000F UN65KS9000FXZA UN65KS9500F UN65KS9500FXZA UN75KS9000F. I'm sorry to write this negative review but as many reviewers have said this remote control cannot be opened to put batteries in. After much effort I managed to open the remote control but I'm not sure if I can do it again if I need to put in new batteries. The manufacturer should

My original Samsung remote dropped several times, some buttons didn't work and were very difficult to press. I was looking for a cheap remote to replace and this one was perfect, it's well made for the price and worked right away when I put the batteries in. I read a few other comments that mentioned the battery cover was too tight. but there were no problems. I was also able to pair the remote with my Fire TV and use it normally. The only difference I felt right away was the raised buttons at…

So I was very hesitant to buy this remote because of the price. I firmly believe that you get what you pay for. A direct replacement from the manufacturer costs over $60 at the time of this review. I will come back to this review 6 months and a year from the original purchase date and provide updates on how it is holding up. First, the remote control is almost a direct replacement. for my original samsung voice remote control. The language function was rarely used and is not a mandatory…