Canon EOS 2000D DSLR Camera Bundle: 18-55mm Lens, 16GB Memory, Sunshine Basic Package Review

For my money, a cool option, I advise beginners not to get involved in night shooting with a basic lens, it makes noise at high ISO, a note for beginners - you can take cool pictures with a cheap camera, things are in pens and experience

After a conventional camera (from the distant 2022), the acquisition of a SLR refreshes the senses to create a photo. Before that, I had to hold in my hands only someone else's 550D, after a close acquaintance with which I decided to take it myself. For starters, I think this camera is more than enough. The pictures are good, and what else is needed for happiness. Later buy 50mm f/1.8 or 1.4 and it will be even better) An excellent device for the price. Nothing more to add

My husband gave me this camera for my birthday. I mean, this is my first DSLR. I thought that I would not be able to understand all the intricacies of the device, but no, everything is extremely simple. Menus and settings are easy to use. It synced well with the phone, which is very convenient. He does not weigh much, the hand does not get tired. An excellent camera in its price range.

When buying this model, I did not have enough knowledge of this type of technology. If I knew this would be a problem, I WOULD NOT BUY. I would choose another model of the same Canon, but with a "normal" flash connection. The rest is all right.

Presenting an unbiased viewpoint.Easy to use and set up, perfect for beginners. The flash runs out quickly. The lens was immediately changed to 24.

Seller PHOTO EQUIPMENT. The deceivers, as they want, set prices, then 27900, and then after 10 minutes 61000, and when they set the price of 15700 and I ordered, then after half a day they canceled the order and re-listed 78000. Shame on such sellers who want to weld on ordinary citizens. For such cases, amazon must exclude such sellers from its system.

Adequate budget. If you want a DSLR, take it. But in the modern world, I'm not sure that this is an adequate purchase. There are mirrorless cameras - they shoot better. Weigh less. Dimensions are much more modest. They cost a little more. There is actually no point in the mirror. Designed for those who are still living in the early 2022s. For domestic needs, the use of the camera is unclear - it is overall. He's heavy. While you pull it out, while you aim bye-bye-bye - take a smart and shoot…

Moved from the 1100D. I shoot almost professionally, so I did not expect an improvement in the picture. It is not there, only the size has increased. Otherwise, at first glance, much has become better and more pleasant. I shot 1200 frames and sold it. Disappointed. With its pros: 1. Low price. 2. The latest modern matrix, which is not inferior to any crop in the entire line. 3. Simple ergonomics. No screens interfere. Cons: 1. There is no center contact on the hot shoe. This means that middle…

Such a technique is clearly not just to get it, point it and "take a picture". That's what smartphones are for. Like any camera, this camera requires, first of all, the ability to take pictures (or the desire to learn this). Then you can unleash its potential. Otherwise, it will just be a waste of money. Got pros: The device itself is very convenient. Happy with the quality of the photos. In skillful hands, it provides ample opportunities for creativity. Has cons: The modest possibilities of a…

Pros: Good entry level/amateur camera. It is difficult to make bad amateur photos on it. With its cons: For me, no, because I have all the contacts in place and working.

For my money, the camera works at 200%. This is a camera, not a video camera. The quality of photos depends on the lens. And this quality does not depend on the processor in the carcass or on the stars in the sky. You won’t do anything good on KIT, immediately buy a normal lens. It's 24mm ef-s or 50mm ef to start with. No iPhone even compares to the crop, so don't be under any illusions. For "vloggers" I want to repeat: Not a single camera in the world can be compared with a video camera of a…

So, if you don't get distracted by arguments - "why is it needed at all if I have 100500 megapixels in my phone and in general it shoots better", then the device is worth its money. There are simply no professional cameras for 20k, which is why the manufacturer positions it as an entry-level camera. However, the ability to use a wide range of Canon optics will take the owner to a slightly different level of photography. Unfortunately, worthy glasses will cost several times more than this…

The truth is that he who knows how and will create an interesting frame on a medium-quality camera, but a pro with a year of experience and on a super-duper camera will not normally shoot. Got pros: Primitiveness. Relativity of a limited set of nested functions for a beginner GOOD! Many we simply never use after a one-time trial. Normal camera. Its cons: The display is small, but what can you expect from a budget camera. The lack of contact on the shoe is what simply MUST have reduced the price

Has pros: Good SLR camera. Copes with tasks. For home use, that's it. Image quality is excellent. Not a small number of functions. Price. Cons: Additional optics are required, especially for shooting distant, small objects.