Cooler Deepcool AK500 Review

I am satisfied with the purchase, I used to use a premium brand, which is now sold to a top price. You can safely take these Chinese, they produce good goods! I set it to 13600k - 5.1 GHz, 1.2v, about 60 degrees in games Pros: Price quality The area dissipates even more than premium coolers Easy Installation Cons: This plastic is certainly beautiful, but it is better to remove it. The thermal paste in the kit may be good, but too thick (this means that when you use your computer for a couple of

R 5900x . overclocking for all cores up to 4.5 GHz . Almost 4.9 GHz for 2 cores . 160 watt consumption, temperatures 78 \ 86. The cooler copes with its function by 110% With its pros: - Quiet at idle, and not particularly noisy under load - The feeling of a quality product in the hands. - Sucks heat from the victim like Sub Zero Cons below: not a perfectly flat sole, but with the right application of thermal paste - this is not a problem at all

I took it for the Ryzen 5600 processor and for a future upgrade, the cooler is too powerful for this processor. Before that, there was a Deepcool Gammax 300, according to the test results, the temperature difference was ~ 6%. CPU tuned via amd curve optimizer to -30 across all cores, peak voltage consumption 1.063, peak watt consumption ~78 The test was carried out in a ventilated case, 3x120mm fans for intake, 2x120mm for exhaust, in both cases there was freshly applied Arctic MX4 thermal…

I changed Gammax S40 to Ryzen 5 5600x, for this miracle. In general, I agree with many that its heat sink for this processor is redundant. Yes, on the S40 in Battlefield 2042 I sometimes noticed the figure 71-72 degrees. With this cooler, more than 65 degrees does not particularly rise. As for the rest, I would not say that I have gained a lot, except for the future for installing a more powerful processor, and of course it will be better in the summer in the heat.