Cordiant Sport 3 225/65 R17 106H summer Review

Diving into the product's features.Pros: The price is adequate. If you choose a small class car Its cons: Out of 4 wheels 3 came with a marriage Product Gyyyyyyy

Offering insights through review.Pros below: Overall good tires, except for lateral strength With its cons: Pierced a tire in the countryside a week after purchase

In general, the performance of these tires for this price is high. But taking into account my operating experience and quality claims, I would recommend either looking for another budget option, or buying more expensive tires. Pros below: Low price. They keep the road well. They perform great in the rain. Has some cons: Noisy. Wear out quickly. For three seasons and about 40,000 mileage, they almost reached the state of "dokatka". And the main drawback is 2 hernias in three seasons. This is the

shall not be installed in any vehicles utilized for business purposes. went ahead and bought some brand new tires for the sable. a great deal of wear and tear over the course of one year. began to break and flake off in large chunks. It has a comparable unpleasant feeling to hydroplaning when you're in the water.

The date of manufacture is stamped on each and every 4x as 49/22. In general, each and every one of the rules I'm curious to know if it's usual for the rubber joints to have seams like these. - I haven't even bothered to install it yet; I'll save my thoughts for later.

Got new tires in 2022. Otezdil 5 summer seasons, and sometimes even went at sub-zero temperatures. They hold the load well, carried cargo up to 1 ton on the SUV, there are no hernias to this day. Works great on wet pavement. Of the minuses. Noisy on dry pavement, even very smooth.

the season did not depart, the rubber curve, everything is at 0 on the balancer, you can see how the rubber beats ! there are no hernias yet, but I think they will appear soon if she was taken away by an egg

A few advantages include having good wheels for a solid four, possibly even with plus. Excellent in most respects, particularly with regard to water standards, country jumble of norms, the ring road, and the motorway. To put it another way, you get your money's worth out of them. My set of R17 50x225 cost 19 thousand dollars, whereas the Koreans are significantly inferior. I would suggest. Negatives: It's loud, but I drive a Mondeo that's 10 years old, so maybe I just need to get used to it.

The first domestic tires that I used. So far I don't see a difference with the famous brands. Perhaps it's too early to judge the quality, drove only 500 km. But overall satisfied.

Some advantages are that it maintains its balance well, performs well in the rain, and readily navigates through puddles. Some disadvantages include that it is quite noisy, however this may be due to inadequate sound insulation or the road surface.

Not noisy, quite manageable tires, puddles accelerates. If this release of rubber is stronger, then the company is credited.

In the summer I often drive the highway at highway speeds, it often rains stagnate. It holds very well in the rain, the tires are predictable, they hold well on braking. It does not hold well on the sand and on the grass, that is, if you like to ride on the crossroads and even on the morning dew, then the pipe is with this rubber. Noisy, but this is not a disadvantage, but a cost. Some kind of compromise. I'm rolling back the second set.