Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
intel 660p series m.2 2280 1tb pcie nvme 3.0 x4 3d2 qlc internal ssd (solid state drive) ssdpeknw010t8x1 logo

Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1 Review

11

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.5
🤖 Internal Solid State Drives, 💾 Data Storage

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(4)
img 1 attached to Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1
img 2 attached to Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1
img 3 attached to Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1
img 4 attached to Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1

Photos by authors

(6)
img 5 attached to Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1
img 6 attached to Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1
img 7 attached to Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1
img 8 attached to Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1

Description of Intel 660p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 3D2 QLC Internal SSD (Solid State Drive) SSDPEKNW010T8X1

1B Storage Capacity. M2. 2280 Form Factor. PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4 Interface. 1800 MB/s Sequential Read Speeds. 1800 Sequential Write Speeds. Intel QLC 3D NAND.

Reviews

Global ratings 11
  • 5
    8
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

Regarding wear and tear, the drive was installed on a system with Windows 10 already installed, because of this it is determined only by the Intel program and windows disk tools, the crystal disk does not display it correctly, I can download other programs, so in November or December 20 years old, after reinstalling Windows I will add a review. The ssd itself, Windows, determined it correctly and it just had to be added, through the tools for working from the Windows disk. . after reinstalling…

Pros
  • Feedback on ssd INTEL 660P SSDPEKNW010T8X1 (as far as I understand, they differ only in packaging) Price - I took it in November 2022, in Amazon, for 7990 for 1 TB ssd was a very good price. There are no complaints about the speed of work, I bought it for games, with an almost complete filling of the ssd (about 900 GB), by eye, I did not notice a slowdown in the speed of work. I didn’t notice any wear, that is, the disk for half a year, in the Intel program, didn’t seem to sink, but I can say for sure after reinstalling Windows, I’ll explain in the comments. 5 year manufacturer's warranty.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

If your system is installed on an SSD with a SATA 3.0 (6Gb/s) interface, then switching to M.2 is more than justified. If the transition from a standard HDD to an SSD is noticeable, then when moving from an SSD to an M.2, it is even more noticeable. A test assembled on the knee using a regular command line, a combination of three hard drives: SATA3 HDD, SATA3 SSD and M.2. NAD at 540 Mb/s (see illustration). And, by the way, a paradoxical result: SATA3 SSD writes to itself much slower even than…

Pros
  • For the price, excellent features. Built-in test in UBUNTU shows honest 1700-1800 Mb/s
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

Excellent thing. With its pros: SSD - fast write / read, compact. No requirement for refrigeration. Its cons: - They say that when stored without power, data is lost. But the computer always has power. - Too expensive for now.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing for the money, glad I did it.

It is divided into two logical disks with OS installation. Worked for several years (6300 hours), Temperature in tests up to 70 degrees, installed in a laptop, in a stationary case with purge should be less.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

Excellent SSD NVMe disk per terabyte. Doesn't get hot like an iron. A tablet with a view on it is loaded in 8 seconds. Everything flies. The system works lightning fast. Very happy with the purchase. Of course, I still consider 9000 too high a price for a 1 terabyte drive. This is not an outlandish technology, it is high time to make it more accessible. Some pros: Speed ​​and volume for less than 9000r Speeds 1700 in both directions With its cons. Supports booting in UEFI mode only. Doesn't…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect product for any user!

I put it in a MacBook pro 15 years old, through an adapter. I got up perfectly, though who will bet, do not be afraid that at first your Mac will not see it. Before removing the original SSD. Create a flash drive with Mojave or newer. Since the stock ElCapitan does not see NVME drives. After installing the system everything works well. I installed the second Windows system by cutting the disk in half and now the buzz!

Pros
  • He got up easily and began to work without much dancing with a tambourine. Read the comment.
Cons
  • It seems not yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

This ssd replaced my file washer. I'm not fond of tests, there's nothing to play yet, I just noticed that heavy pictures in the folder are drawn instantly and the archives are unpacked faster. If I see anything, I'll write I had a hard 1tb hdd at 5900 rpm. Stands in Scythe Quiet Drive (SQD2.5-1000) I thought the computer was completely silent. But now there is really absolute silence. The whole computer is passively cooled. Test when filled approximately 50%

Pros
  • The axis is on another ssd, but it still boots faster. I am adding 14:02:21 Intel warranty. Glitches and errors still continued to pour in, and I turned not to the store, but directly to Intel. After clarifying all the details, I was assigned a date for the arrival of the DHL courier. They took my disc and two days later I had a new disc. Already when I transferred my junk to it, I realized that the old one was defective. The new one warmed up to a maximum of 65 and the old one rested at 80. There are no errors now. Didn't have to go anywhere. Very comfortably. The question of choosing the next hard is no longer worth it.
Cons
  • The resource, threw his belongings, downloaded a couple of films, and now there are 772 GB of records. So you wonder how long it will last. Today, 03/04/20, more than 13 thousand errors fell in the system log. See photo. I didn’t notice anything myself until I tried to go into a folder on the disk, an error came up, a non-existent directory or something like that. Before that, I also saw in the log that there were also failures on the second day, but a couple of dozen errors came out and that's it. Did not pass the test of the proprietary software. (after reboot) And the next morning it was gone. The most disgusting, floating error, I will hand it over under warranty, and there everything will be fine on the test . While furychit, if it doesn’t fail again, I’ll probably score. I bought it on time, on the second of March with 300 points it turned out to be 6685.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Poor quality, I will not buy this product again.

I put a deuce for the disgusting write speed. The manufacturer claims that the write speed is the same as the read speed and is 1800 MB/s. My measurements showed that the write speed is about 300 MB / s (dd, Gnome Disk Util), numerous reviews confirm this figure. A computer or laptop running on this disk can create a subjective feeling of "brakes" compared to conventional disks with a write speed of ~ 500 MB / s.

Pros
  • Price, reading speed
Cons
  • Recording speed

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is of good quality, there is only one minor defect.

The main disadvantage of QLC is memory, therefore, in order to maintain optimal performance, you have to leave a lot of space, preferably more than half - ideally. And the larger the volume, the better. Therefore, you can take a 2 TB model. After the cache fills up, the speed drops to 40 MB sec, which is two or more times slower than any modern flash drive or SD card. Therefore, I would not take it under the system. Well, personally, my problems, I sin on the BIOS of the Z170 MSI Gaming M3…

Pros
  • Cheap. Even cheaper than many SATA analogues. Works with files many times faster while there is a free cache.
Cons
  • In general, it is difficult to call them the shortcomings of a particular model if you read reviews about it. It’s definitely not worth taking blindly, but when you know everything, and you know what choice you are making, it’s difficult to single out something, so there are none. I note that it is unlikely that it will fit the system due to the features of QLC memory and a weak resource of 200 tb per 1 gig model.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It functions perfectly, nothing unusual.

Did not live up to expectations (I use SSD for the first time). The wow effect did not happen. Yes, the system starts 3 times faster, but not instantly. The launch of real applications often, apparently, does not depend on the disk at all - approximately unchanged, and sometimes slower. Perhaps, when switching to an SSD in a laptop, the effect is more obvious, in the case of a desktop, it is somehow sluggish. The only place where I noticed a positive effect in the work is the browser. If you…

Pros
  • The lowest price among similar devices. Small dimensions and weight.
Cons
  • High storage cost. Subjective access time on a par with HDD. Periodic "sticking" when accessing the storage. The low speed of writing large amounts of information, after several tens of GB, is much lower than the speed of the HDD! It turns out that the technical characteristics are very much overestimated. It strains the declared funny resource of 200 rewrites.