Intel I5 7600K Desktop Processors BX80677I57600K Review

Sat on i5 4th generation. My main tasks are graphics, video editing, photo processing from full-frame cameras. When switching to a new processor in these tasks, the gain is . zero. I don’t quite understand why I started all this, I just lost money. Even at temperatures of 14nm and i5-4570 22 nm - the same in HWMonitor. Otherwise, the usual modern productive processes for assembly in compact cases. From the 4th generation, it's definitely not worth ating to it.

The processor is too expensive but of high quality . I answer that any store will reduce the price by at least 2k, then there will be much more purchases!

There was nothing to do, it was in the evening, I bought it for 5tr, to replace the 4560 hyperstump. faster, the heat dissipation is the same.

Since has merged all i5 processors into one category, I will explain that we are talking about the intel Core i5 7400 a good option not only for a budget gaming computer, but also for a workhorse.

I5 7600 The system boots faster, everything just comes off instantly, as if I had bought a new ssd. With 4600 everything also worked superbly, but the difference is still noticeable. Why did I change it? I wanted to comfortably play the last hitman and horizon zero down. pentium was missing from the word at all: for example, you will stop bald, but he continues to go further and cannot be stopped and the percentage is always under a hundred, then this happens from time to time, but of course…

When compared to other processors, the i5 of the sixth generation and the seventh generation with the nearest indicators fare the best. Although there isn't much of a disparity between the two, the cost is obviously different. Unless you work with graphics or video, I don't see much purpose in chasing after more powerful processors because the difference is not significant. This is the best thing you can buy, both for use in gaming and in the workplace.

In a nutshell, I'll explain everything to you all at once. Every test was run on a GTX 1050 with 4 GB of memory. So let's start. Warface has a frame rate of 230–290 at 1080p with all settings maxed up. CS:GO maintains a steady frame rate of 300 fps (On maps, cobblestone runs at 280-290 fps, and dust 2 maintains 300 fps). Oh, you almost reminded me. On servers that contain!ws!knife +40 gives 30 players a frame rate of 260 at the highest possible settings. upcoming installment of World of Tanks…

This is how it is set up. Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti Windforce OC, Zalman CNPS11X PERFORMA+, Chieftec 700w Eco series, Gigabyte GA-B250-HD3, and Ballistix Sport 2*4GB. AMD Phenom 2 955 was used previously. Heaven and earth are nothing in comparison. fails to heat up. I placed two fans for blowing in and one for blowing out when I was assembling. typical game temperature is between 37 and 39 g. It decreased by an average of 3 grams when I added 1 extra fan for blowing out. Prots omitted overclocking…

Collected sistemnik on a new mat. B250 board with 8 GB DDR4. The DEEPCOOL GAMMAXX 300 cooler copes well, only its mountings are not very reliable. The system flies, very satisfied. The computer was going to work with graphics.

Pros: In normal tasks, it shows itself quite acceptable Can even run games Its cons: Jumps and overheating Has no temperature limit The thermal interface is ill-conceived

I took OEM, there were about a dozen of them in the store, they let me choose any. I chose by measuring the cover in the light with a caliper reserved for this, out of 8 that were only the 5th in a row turned out to be with an ideal cover. I took the 7600k version for 15000. Now I would take i7. Pros: 1. Cold. 2. Fast. Holds 4.2 GHz without much shamanism with the setting. 3. Consumes little until you load. 4. Faster than QX9770 which was before. Cons: 1. Humped heat spreader cover on most OEM…

The clock frequency for this processor is not correct, 3.8-4.2 GHz is its real power. In conjunction with the gtx 750 shows the following; battlefield 3- full hd high 60-90 Battlefield 4-full hd high 60 stable Gta 5-full hd ultra high 50-70 At the same time, the processor load did not reach more than 50-60�ro = powerful, with a margin for the future, excellent potential for overclocking. At a frequency of 4.2 GHz, the consumption is 0.853

Second month in use. There are no complaints. I installed a processor with a budget tower, since in Runet they write that the stone is quite cold. I drove through Linx and got 73C, I was not happy. Hands turned off auto-acceleration and lowered the voltage. I won 10C degrees easily: with a loss of 3-5% of performance from disabling auto-acceleration. For your money, the option is just super.

Got pros: Productive, low power consumption, cold, s1151. Pairs well with GTX 1060 and 1070. Cons: Not all motherboards are 2022. support out of the box (except for the 2xx series). A rite of passage is required to ate the BIOS on the old processor.

I bought before NG 2022 for 13500. I am writing about the i5 7600k processor. Now it costs 20k, I think this is too much, the stone is not new, the 10th generation of Intel is already on the nose, and the prices have been driven under the 9th generation of Intel, which is superior in performance. For a similar price tag, even cheaper, you can already take the ryzen 5 3600x. I bought for games, in games it shows itself perfectly in the assembly with 1070ti. The 1080ti already lacks the threading

I got up normally for the first time showing 34-35 degrees in the BIOS until it was time for Windows 10 to ate the type for games and for creativity. Well, the beginning is 40 degrees, and then the final 45. Now there is a thermalright macho reav a (bw) I recommend for those who do not want to install CBO. Has pros: Decent heating underfoot (just kidding). Really hot processor. But last year, all sites wrote not 91 watts, but 60 about it, which is why I was puzzled for a long time why it shows…