Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 32
  • 5
    26
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good quality product, I rate this purchase excellent.

I took it to replace my i5 6600k, the difference is obvious, although that processor was fine) but sometimes I play the "extra optimized" PUBG game, the microfreezes on the old processor in this game are fed up, I decided to change😄 no ​​no, not for the sake of pubg, but also for a comfortable game including. On the Internet, in tests, it is almost as good as i7 8700k👍

Pros
  • Faster than my previous one) no built-in vidyahi
Cons
  • They are not here

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

At the end of last year, I assembled a very good thin computer for games - the SilverStone SST-RVZ02B case ideally stood in a cabinet next to a 55 "TV. I chose a processor for a long time, so that it would not be very expensive, would not overheat in games and there was nothing superfluous ( built-in video). First I looked at AMD, they are cheaper by 5 thousand with about the same characteristics. But good Mini-ITX boards for them, on the contrary, were more expensive. I won almost nothing in…

Pros
  • At the time of assembly (almost a year ago), it was the best in terms of price / performance ratio. Perhaps even now the best processor from intel is up to 15 thousand. Useless with a discrete video card, the graphics core is disabled - the price is less. The base frequency is higher than the 9600 without the K index. The heat dissipation suited me for the Mini-ITX SilverStone SST-RVZ02B and Noctua NH-L9i case - it does not overheat at all.
Cons
  • No hyperthreading. For myself, I don’t consider it a minus, but Intel, of course, is a miser :)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

I have been using this processor for more than a year and I am completely satisfied with it. I built a system for online shooters (CS:GO, PUBG, Battlefield) and it was critical for me to have not only high, but also stable FPS without drawdowns and freezes in dynamic scenes. 9600kf overclocked to 5GHz is perfect for this. On the z390 motherboard, AsRock Extreme4 overclocks elementarily and works stably at 1.34v under the Dark Rock Pro 4 cooler (in games, the temperature is 65 degrees, in the…

Pros
  • Price, overclocking, stability, speed
Cons
  • They are not here

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not everything is so bad, the average purchase in quality.

I took this percentage as according to reviews and reviews "Taking 5GHz without problems." It didn't work out that way for me. At first I wanted to put 4 points, since the percent performs its functions at the declared frequencies of the manufacturer, but then I remembered that it has the prefix K, for which they also take money, so I feel a small divorce and competent marketing from Intel. In the reviews, all the processors are mishandled, extremely successful models, perhaps even scalped…

Pros
  • Fairly good performance in modern games and programs.
Cons
  • Acceleration, heat dissipation. I lost in this lottery, I got an extremely unsuccessful copy. Overclocking did not work, I tried to overclock the percentage, I killed about a month in general to search for more or less stable values. As a result, the maximum that was possible was 4.6 GHz with a voltage of 1.35v. The stability was really not very good, in many games and in everyday tasks I caught bsod and an endless freeze. There was no point in setting a higher voltage, because my Dark rock pro 4 cooler in stress tests at this voltage kept the temperature at about 94-96 degrees, which is already close to critical. I tried to reduce, as a result, the percentage does not pass the stress test in OCCT even at 4.5 GHz and 1.35v, I caught errors at the 20-30th minute of the test with a large data set. A further decrease in the multiplier makes overclocking generally irrational. Exhausted, I decided to try the Intel Performance Maximizer as a last resort, which, according to the assurances of users on this stone, gives 4.8GHz with AVX offset minus 3. On my own stone, the program gave a result of 4.5GHz and AVX minus 1. Which, in fact, is a very extremely low figure.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturer's assurances, high quality.

In my free time I like to play PUBG, the game is terribly with a crooked unoptimized engine, other games worked smartly on my old i5 6600k (4.5 overclock), and pubg constantly gave out some kind of microfreeze, a 2060 video card. I decided to replace it, of course not specifically for pubg) I love something new, I was satisfied and pubg flies! Even win10 feels like it works faster. For 3 years, like the previous processor, this is enough for me now. Feedback for igrunov)

Pros
  • Nimble
Cons
  • Until I discovered

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

It was possible to take on it only 4700 Mhz in frequency and 4300 in cache (at a voltage of 1.36 V). There are no complaints about memory overclocking, the gearbox is good - the Crucial Ballistix Sport LT Red (BLS2K16G4D32AESE) 3200MHz (2x16Gb KIT) kit was overclocked to 3900 Mhz CL16. Pay attention before buying - the latest revisions are chasing badly and your processor will not take 95% of the frequency of 5000 Mhz. At a frequency of 4900, the processor simply goes blue at any voltage, the…

Pros
  • + Price; + Almost identical FPS in games relative to 9900K;
Cons
  • - The latest revisions of this processor are chasing poorly; - Lack of NT;

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product suited me, I will recommend it to my friends.

In overclocking, I took a stable 4.8 GHz, a fixed voltage of 1.35V. I read from people that they easily drove under 5+ GHz, I just wanted 5, but apparently not fate. I tried to raise it to 1.4V and 4.9 GHz - drops are already starting in stress tests and even just when using the system. I suspect that the matter is in the Asrock z370 pro4 motherboard. cooler be quiet! dark rock pro4 does a good job in my opinion. Ideally, I wanted to overclock through the indent from the initial voltage…

Pros
  • - Generally good. - Optimal in terms of price and quality for games, in comparison with AMD competitors for this price. For everyday tasks, AMD is more efficient. - Reveals rtx 2060s graphics card. In a bunch they pull Alyx on high (Oculus Rift cv1). On ultras, it freezes a little at times on the street, but not to the point of nausea. - Accelerates.
Cons
  • It didn't run as fast as expected. Didn't win the lottery?

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

Shows temperature 28 degrees Cooler installed his old one, which cooled the first generation of processors From i3-560 Duck think gentlemen, this processor is very cool and powerful. 2 sticks of 8 GB RAM Speed ​​2400 I don't think it's necessary anymore. And while left the old video card GTX 750 1GB Pulls almost everything Truth with friezes Well REZIDENT EVIL 3 REMASTERED Tower. Next month I'll take the vidyahu from my hands. By the way, under it took the motherboard Asus prime b365 a-m I took

Pros
  • Very cold processor Powerful Valid for at least 4 years

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Unmatched Single Stream Performance

While I think the AMD Ryzen 3 series is impressive and remarkable, single is -Thread performance too important in the long run. I run a performance monitoring application 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to know exactly where my bottlenecks are. 95% of the time my system is waiting for the CPU it has idle cores, but one or more of the loaded cores are busy - a single thread bottleneck. This happens in a variety of applications from my IDE to a web browser to video games. AMD has several products…

Pros
  • 3.70GHz to 4.60GHz max Turbo Frequency/9MB Cache
Cons
  • Not bad, but...

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expensive downgrade: NOT for video editing in Premiere Pro

I can't speak for gaming with KF but I can say I'm very disappointed with this one for Adobe Premiere Pro. I've been using the i5-9600K for a long time and was ready for an upgrade. I knew the i7-9700KF didn't have integrated graphics, but I had no idea how that would affect the Premier Pro since I'm using a GTX 970 graphics card. After a series of tests, my result is a 25% drop in performance compared to the 9600K. It looks like Premiere Pro can now use BOTH the onboard GPU on the 9600K and…

Pros
  • Intel Optane memory supported
Cons
  • Can't remember

Revainrating 5 out of 5

good value for money for system builders

A solid choice with very good single core performance. What you should know, what you will like: * No integrated graphics. That means no display without a discrete GPU. But that's fine if you're building a separate GPU anyway (and keeping the chip cheap). * Fan/heatsink not included. Building a system for enthusiasts encourages you to choose something other than the noisy machines that came with older Intel processors. except the GPU).* 4.6GHz Turbo Boost cannot be applied to all cores, but…

Pros
  • Discrete GPU - no CPU graphics
Cons
  • Out of fashion