Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
🌑️ jet 10170 smart thermostat logo

🌑️ JET 10170 Smart Thermostat Review

3

Β·

Excellent

Revainrating 5 out of 5Β Β 
RatingΒ 
5.0
πŸ”₯ Engine Cooling, 🏎️ Performance Car Parts & Accessories

View on AmazonView on Π―M

Media

(1)
img 1 attached to 🌑️ JET 10170 Smart Thermostat

Description of 🌑️ JET 10170 Smart Thermostat

Designed to reduce engine temperature and produce more horsepower. Made from stainless steel. Allows the engine to operate at its peak efficiency. Provides a precise metering of water throughout the engine. Easy to use.

Reviews

Global ratings 3
  • 5
    3
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

It just works! Best of thermostats

Thermostat tested prior to installation, open on time at 180Β°F. Maintains constant engine temperature in 40-100Β°F weather, couldn't ask for more.

Pros
  • Made of stainless steel
Cons
  • So far so good

Revainrating 5 out of 5

HIGH QUALITY MADE IN USA

MADE IN USA which I love for my USA made SUV. The fit and finish is much better than other Offshore models and looks like they are built to last. Nice solid looks right out of the box. Speaking of "box": This is an easy-to-open clamshell that can be opened with bare fingers and then reused. I will update you on the performance and durability after installing this gem.

Pros
  • Ensures accurate water metering throughout engine
Cons
  • Low maintenance

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Nice stainless steel thermostat

Nicely made stainless steel thermostat. I read on the Dodge forum that the Jet 180 actually opens at 183-185. I installed this on a '99 Dakota C/CR/T 5.9 liter V-8 engine. On the factory thermostat (195) the temp gauge ran just under half the mark and the needle covered 2 of 210. The Jet 180's temp gauge ran at 1/3 of the mark or just under 2 of 210 on the gauge! Fits perfectly in the body. UPDATE: 2-2-13 Adequate heat for temperatures during puberty. Obviously not as hot as the factory 195…

Pros
  • Runs the engine at maximum efficiency
Cons
  • I don't remember but there was something