Has some pros: Not noisy, not a single spike flew off the burst tire during the winter, I also went to summer ones from this brand, but the hole spoiled the impression With its cons: I traveled for 1 winter, and on the 2nd hole in the sidewall, I later read that it was very good. thin

Rubber for people who drive no more than 60. And who have a weak engine that cannot slip on ice. Otherwise, do not rush either on ice or in loose snow. It blows away in corners. If you decide to take this rubber, either save a little more and buy cheaper rubber, you won’t see much difference. Better add and buy something more expensive and better. Has pros: Not noisy, average price, preservation of presentation for a long time. Has cons: Derzhak is terrible, demolition when cornering, on ice…

Divorce. hiss himself is called Has pros: I ordered a studded one, I even asked the seller. As a result, I came without studs With its cons: I ordered a studded one, I even asked the seller. As a result, I came without studs

Ride quality is like the old old amtel I sold with the previous car. But this old Amtel did not skid on wet pavement like this new Kumho! I regret that I fell for the “foreign car” trend, it would be better if I bought Amtel or Kama again. Well, winter is here. First impressions did not deceive me. These tires are not winter tires - they don’t drive 15 cm on fresh snow, they scour the road at speed on ice.

At first I wanted to write a very positive review, but in view of the appearance of a hernia, I decided to put a solid 4k all the same. In general, very low price and tolerable quality. Some pros: Low price, good quality, noise below Hakkapelita 5, holds well on snow-covered asphalt and during icy rain turns at 90 km / h passes with confident grip. Has some cons: After 2 months of operation, a hernia appeared. They say most likely the poor quality of the tire itself, it did not fall into the…

I bought tires in the dimension 175/65 R14. of the advantages can be distinguished smoothness, especially on asphalt, and when driving on loose snow and in snowfall. When braking on packed snow, ice, ABS often works. In winter, you should always be more careful when driving a car, regardless of the brand of tires. Pros: The rubber is soft, almost noisy, rides well on dry pavement. Cons: As a result of a low protruding spike, it causes difficulties when starting off on ice, and simply on rolled…

Tires purchased in October 2022 235 \ 65 \ 17. Operation 4 winters. On average, per month, the roll on asphalt is more than 500 km., On snow 50-70 km . from glue only in motion. On a rear-wheel drive car, when driving backwards, it does not want to get out of the ice or snow glue, it simply carries gas sideways along the glue. The first 2 winters are generally fire, pulled out of loose snow with a bang. For 4 seasons, the loss of spikes is exactly 10 pieces. on 4 wheels. Enough for the tread…

Installed on a Subaru Legacy. 225/50/18, rulitsya like summer. Asphalt plus no problem. And for two days the rink behaved well. For wear and spikes, I can’t say anything yet) Abnormally warm winter. We'll see after the season. In general, the rubber pleasantly surprised)

Pros: not expensive spikes all in place after 4 months of driving on asphalt and snow Cons below: drives everywhere but is very afraid of snow-slush, in fact, it was dragged into the Mercedes at 10 km / h

The pebbles in the tread are more useful than the spikes on this rubber. Deeply recessed, round and all these are minuses. I haven’t ridden on snow yet, but on ice Rubber is about nothing, you pay money for spikes and you get friction. Slippage even at 3 speeds, I drive a mechanic, I don’t recommend it for the Siberian winter, you can drive somewhere in Hong Kong.

For operation in the snowy winter season 2022/2022 in the city of St. Petersburg, I was satisfied with the tires. On asphalt that was poorly removed from snow, as well as in heavy snowfalls, the rubber did not let me down, behaved predictably and “kept” the road (of course, we are talking about reasonable speeds under the above road conditions), did not lose a single spike during the season. Comparing rubber with the previous one - Tigar, I was satisfied with kumho tires.

Last winter, I never got stuck anywhere (on rear-wheel drive!) And I didn’t understand why people on front-wheel drive constantly skid. Wear per season is minimal. The spikes are in place, although I often lay sideways. Pros below: They are not thrown along the rut. Irregularities go smoothly. The car stands on the road very confidently. In terms of noise, they are 1 in 1 like summer ones. At speed they behave predictably. With its cons: On bare ice, they behave like a cross between spikes and…

Used 2 seasons on 4wd minivan. I always pump this rubber I had to lower it to normal, too hard. Handling 5. noise 5. patency 4. previous BG winter slalom went better in deep snow. the spikes are all in place. it is poorly balanced! 215 \ 70r15 cargo 150 200 grams discs molding original. China rubber production. I took my sister too, Toko marshal 175 \ 70r14 production of Korea on a crooked iron, the largest load is 40g. as you want, understand the manufacturers who claim that there is no…

I drove about 5000 km, about the comments that write that it’s like “like in the summer, it doesn’t slow down at all on ice.” All nonsense, yes, the first 50-100 km, it doesn’t hold very confidently, then you just put it on, what do you expect from it for this money. All tires need to be rolled in. After about 100 km, it began to show itself better and better. Now the duck is generally delighted with it, it catches anything, the tread depth allows you to row porridge, the softness of the rubber

I chose this particular model solely on the basis of reviews on the Internet, not every tire with such a price has a rating of 4.5. Yesterday, 01/12/2022, there was a heavy snowfall in Hong Kong and the region, as a result of which it was not possible to leave the yard, even along a well-cleared (though not to the ground) clearing. During the operation (since November 2022 ~ 2022 km) I really didn’t lose a single spike, although I repeatedly, through negligence, got under way with slippage and…

Went the second winter tires Kumho WI31. In general, I am satisfied. This is, in principle, my first winter tires, which I chose and bought myself. Bought it for a pretty good price. I can say that I am pleased with her, first of all it is the merit of the fact that she is new. As for me, it has good wear resistance, I don’t see any loss in tread thickness, the rubber passed almost 5500 in 1 season. It keeps well on the snow, but with a provocation, the car can be torn into a skid. Doesn't drag

Its pros: In general, not very noisy tires with characteristics corresponding to their price. For half the season, all the spikes are in place. Has cons: To be honest, compared to the Hakka 9, of course, they behave less predictably on slippery roads. I don't recommend driving them on icy roads.

Tires for quiet and not aggressive driving. On the front-wheel drive, the rear wheels slip into a skid in a turn with a slight downward slope during a thaw on an icy road - somewhere at 54 km / h, but quite predictably. Departure from the garage to a small hill after freezing rain with almost no gas with a bang, without slipping, scratching the ice and crawling. For the most part, this is a nitpick and a feature of uncleaned yards - after a long parking lot and heavy snowfall, when slipping, it

Has some pros: Low price for 17 diameter, soft and quiet. It runs very well on smooth roads. Up to 120 km / h is quite predictable (St. Petersburg Cad). Cons: Strongly sausage in a rut, when rebuilding it is very felt, especially after the summer Bridgestone.

Among the competitors in this price range, I think the best option. Of course, you can conti, he is the only one, it seems, spikes over the hill, but the price tag bites. And Kumho is a great option for those who choose in terms of price / quality / safety. Different pros: Adequate price tag, good quality, low noise, speed index on the level. It behaves well on asphalt - acceleration (240 hp, four-wheel drive), braking, long turns at 170 km / h keeps it with a bang - there is no rolling or…