Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 35
  • 5
    31
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect product for any user!

I started driving in 1977, have gone through five different vehicles, and have been using MICHELIN tires since the summer of 2022. My first set of MICHELIN tires was the Insalto Sport, which turned out to be nothing more than a fairy tale. I recommend paying close attention to the manufacturer when shopping (specifically targeting France, Japan, Italy, Germany, and even 2022 in certain situations). Our geographic location is optimal for these nations, and the product must also be manufactured…

Pros
  • MICHELIN rubber is ideal for our North Caucasus environment and climate. In the rain, it's just a high-speed train; handling is better just no; twice I tried to break the car into a skid on wet asphalt; it's very difficult to do so; you can write a lot of good things for this rubber; some will say CONTINENTAL, but it's not a good thing to ride on in temperatures below +8 (hard, doesn't hold the road, slows down badly).
Cons
  • They have left.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

The rubber is fantastic, which is a pro. The release date is set for December 2022, and it was manufactured in Thailand. The one before that took me ten years, and we will expect the same level of difficulty from this one as well. 1) Walkability. The same was acquired from the previous owner, and visible signs of wear were still rather distant. Therefore, it would have been plenty for three seasons; but, the tires celebrated their 10th anniversary, and in honor of the occasion, they were given…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, Im glad I found this product.

Wonderful latex. Invested in Polik on Cordiant rims. Long experienced a nauseating rumble while driving. The automobile seemed inexpensive, as it should have been. My patience had worn thin after two summers, so I took Experienced's advice and ordered these tires. As soon as I reversed out of the pit where I had changed my shoes, I could feel the improvement in my level of comfort. Aside from the obvious improvements, I've noticed that the car is now much quieter. The engine has finally been…

Pros
  • Rubber has a soft, silent texture. The cost (5600 per unit) is extremely reasonable given the high standard of the product.
Cons
  • In a nutshell, no.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

Below are some advantages: The most essential benefit that this rubber offers is its resilience to wear; the first set that I owned in 2022 drove approximately 120.000 miles. and in general, it would still have the same appearance as. Maintains a stable footing on the road. Some cons: Maybe just the price (in comparison to other brands), and it's not quite a clear zero, but it's not really that important.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Im amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

just acquired in March 2022. About 4000 R was spent on each tire (the slow dimension is always more expensive). There were only about four brands in the first line from which I could choose, as it turned out. Malaysia started producing Toyo rubber, and in every single assessment, it is said that this is an entirely different rubber. Nokian Green writes decently, but it wears thin quickly. In the fire: Yokohama and Bridstone. In terms of my dimension, Goodyear did not notice anything. I…

Pros
  • New. The sidewall is not weak, that much is clear. It is reasonably thick and springy. Hernias ought to be impossible, in theory. Reviews of the XM2's predecessor claim that it should have a lengthy walking range. Undoubtedly, the tires are quite quiet (my Hyundai Matrix has average sound insulation). became audible, but not in relation to the engine and the road.
Cons
  • I wouldn't describe it as soft. Toyo was more gentle. The term "elastic" is more appropriate for the XM2 +, as they properly note here in other evaluations. Pits swallows, although not so quietly and straight.

The claimed wear resistance cannot be evaluated at this time. The model is generally satisfied. I like Nokian, but I didn't pick this for the summer because of the rumors about a bad resource that may be depleted in a single season of driving on wheels. If so, how likely are you to suggest it to others? In a word, yes. Tire pressures are normalized to an exact value.

Pros
  • Very gentle, felt right away following the fairly hard Velcro of the Yokohama IG50+. No bumps indicate that swallowing — lines up. There is an average level of noise that is not bothersome (there used to be Nokian, which was quieter). A hardworking peasant in the middle, neither at the top nor at the bottom.
Cons
  • Better stopping power was hoped for. It's possible that, after fewer than 1000 kilometers, the tires still need to be broken in. He also mentioned that driving in a dry rut gave him a feeling of not having complete command of the vehicle. I don't think there are any major flaws, but I also can't say for sure that it runs perfectly smooth.

17,000 miles on a 205/55/16 tire during the first tire season on an Octavia A7 2022 during the summer. 2nd season, and already at 7,000 miles (for a grand total of 24,000 on it) 2-3 mm of the tread are "gone," but the rubber still holds dear, exactly as supple and "controllable" as it was before. Has some pros: Good tires that are extremely plush and comfy, have good road holding, and have a stopping distance that is "understandable" on dry pavement. Maintains a steady balance and does not roll

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

I chose to go to the south, so I put it before a trip to the sea because the temperature was just right for changing shoes there. However, the next day it snowed and we had to travel in the sleet and rain. In the mountains, when the temperature dropped to -1.5, it maintains the road superbly, and on the serpentine, it steers sensitively and quickly. In certain places, I reached speeds of up to 160 km/h as I returned home in the rain. I hit a ditch at about 70 kilometers per hour near the…

Pros
  • Excellent road holding; quiet; gentle.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good and quality product, but there are flaws.

205/55-16. bought 7/05/2022. traveled 400 km a small and not constant vibration was noticed at 105-115 km / h. but not sure if it's because of the rubber. although on the old winter tires did not notice. Haven't noticed any fuel savings yet. Pros: unexpectedly quiet. soft already at 10-15 degrees. easily balanced. (on three wheels, loads of 5g. for 4m -15g.) Easily drains water at speed. Its cons: "off-road" capabilities = 0. on wet grass does not even go "down". (with a slight slope) Jumping…

Premium is premium, gentlemen. Rubber for those who do not accept compromises. Chose for a long time. What was needed was rubber with a good sole that provided good handling, water evacuation, durability, and grip. Well, there was a requirement for rigidity to the sidewall in order to avoid rolling as much as possible. Tigar Touring seems to be good on the sole, great for wet trails and country roads, but weak sidewall. Bridgestone Turanza is not so good on the sole, but it has a hard bead…

Pros
  • Silence. Comfort. Controllability.
Cons
  • Relatively soft sidewall.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, its nice to use.

I have been using Michelin for quite a long time, the first experience was with French-made rubber, I was leaving for 7 years without any complaints. As a result, I already use 4 pairs of wheels and I was not disappointed, even though it was made in 2022. They definitely cost their money. With its pros: Excellent elastic, not noisy rubber with a strong sidewall. Good handling on wet roads, excellent water drainage. Very satisfied with the rubber. Good temperature range. With its cons: Did not…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

Previous tires departed 10 years. Net mileage on them is about 80 thousand km. Alive, replaced due to the fact that the tires are recommended for this period as much as possible - in appearance, they could still leave for 1-2 seasons. Let's hope the new one doesn't fail. Pros: Of the advantages of the new XM2 +: 1. Relatively inexpensive, tire fitting was a gift;), if it weren’t there, I would still buy this one 2. Holds well at speed on wet pavement 3. Brakes like normal 4. Handling is normal…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

A week after installation, I went to the neighboring region along our usual 2022 roads, which in places turn into just directions, broken, with pits, potholes and simply no asphalt. 1200 km passed just with a bang. Sometimes there were such blows that I thought - everything, kopets and disks and rubber. But everything went great. OOOOchen strong rubber, endured all the way without any complaints and consequences. For comparison with the last such trip, Nokian Nordman arrived square and covered…

Pros
  • Excellent road holding, accelerates and brakes without slipping, both on dry pavement and on wet roads. Very strong, perfectly holds blows without consequences and hernias.
Cons
  • After installing this rubber, it became audible how the suspension rattles)))

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best I have ever used, great product for anyone!

and clean, dry pavement Michelin has no equal. A little sand on the pavement and rain, you already need to be on the alert. For the city, I recommend Michelin. Fishing, village, primer - you need to choose a different rubber. Some pros: Silence immediately, perfectly balanced, the car goes smoothly, does not play and does not wobble on the road, during sharp turns, maneuvers, I got up on two wheels, two wheels on the other side completely came off the road, like on a rally, the car feels great…