Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
national hardware n216 069 v1950 pocket logo

National Hardware N216 069 V1950 Pocket Review

4

·

Average

Revainrating 3.5 out of 5  
Rating 
3.3
🔒 Door Hardware & Locks, 🔧 Hardware

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(1)
img 1 attached to National Hardware N216 069 V1950 Pocket

Description of National Hardware N216 069 V1950 Pocket

Authorized Replacement for Stanley Hardware Stock #N216-069. Fits doors from 1-1/4 to 1-5/8 inches thick. Includes flush pull on edge of door. Manufactured of solid brass for maximum corrosion resistance.

Reviews

Global ratings 4
  • 5
    1
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Bag door handle is the best in hardware

This chrome door handle is rated "cheap and fun". It is suitable for low consumption applications, especially for replacing worn rods when there is already a cutout in the door.

Pros
  • Everything is fine!
Cons
  • Operating Speed

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Had to return 1 of 2 due to missing parts.

these are new products but not closed. It is probably returned goods. I have ordered 2. One has been opened and sealed with tape, all parts included. The other was open, unglued and missing parts. I had to send that back. The quality of the product is good but you risk losing parts from previously opened and returned packages. The price is approx. 40% below the next listed product.

Pros
  • beautiful thing
Cons
  • all right

Revainrating 1 out of 5

poor shipping in Door Hardware & Locks

The product was received in good shipping packaging but the packaging of the product was opened and looked like it had been dropped on the ground and used to drive on skates. . Obviously this was the condition it was shipped in and a VERY irresponsible way of doing business. I will avoid any further dealing in housewares which is a shame as I recently bought a whole house of doorknobs and was very happy with my purchase but I refuse to take any chances in the future as time is of the essence in

Pros
  • Consistent test results
Cons
  • Could have chosen a newer model