Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 25
  • 5
    19
  • 4
    6
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, Im glad I found this product.

I have been using it for more than 2 years, I did not regret the purchase at all. The coolest thing for him is to photograph one person, if there are 2 or more faces in the frame, then one will be in focus and the others will be out of focus. Here you need to take this feature into account yourself and put people parallel to the plane of the lens. And for landscape photography, it is better to look for something else, sharper. If possible, take

Pros
  • After this lens, I asked myself the question, why then do we need fixes and still have not found an answer. I had a lot of fixes, now they are all sold.
Cons
  • Damn that's the price. Ovals on the bokeh appear when magnified. If you use a focal length of 70 mm, then there are no ovals. After six months, the rubber band on the zoom ring came off a little, I’ll never know how to glue it. Although this is Nikon's signature disease.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The price/quality ratio is great, I will buy again.

Great lens! Definitely replaces the D-series primes in its range, well, except for 85mm F1.4 D and 85mm F1.8 D, their open gives more opportunities to use a shallow depth of field. The 105D F2 and 135DF2 are, of course, very good lenses, but their advantage is only in the depth of the bokeh, which cannot compete with the versatility of the 70-200 F 2.8 (let's push the subjectivity of image perception into the background). However, I had to change the backpack in order to fit 14-24, 24-70…

Pros
  • Sharpness, focusing speed and accuracy, almost no chromaticity, minimal distortion, stub, weather protection, assembly.
Cons
  • Not at all. Someone complains about the filters that it is impossible to unscrew the polarizer. Screw the protective first, then the polarizer. Weight and dimensions do not apply to the disadvantage, the manufacturer indicates these parameters initially.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the quality is good, the price is acceptable.

About the bad: 1) For all that good things are written about this lens, there are also occupational diseases in it. The first disease is weight, for 15 minutes of wearing it, it will either pull your hand away, or will hang on the belt, beating off the liver by tapping, in continuation of the criticism, one can also mention the size, which can not be put into any bag and in any cramped places strives to hook on everything that only possible. 2) Despite the fact that all lenses have this…

Pros
  • Focusing speed, sharpness, dust and moisture protection, impressiveness
Cons
  • price, weight, size

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

I have been going to this lens for more than 7 years, constantly consoling myself that the photo is taken by the photographer, not the camera. But when it first came into my hands, I immediately realized how much I missed using cheap replacements. I used Tamrons 70-300, Nikon 70-300. What immediately catches the eye is the color rendering. Nothing compared to cheap replacements. Pure pleasant color, easily giving in to processing. A little later, I began to notice that the stabilizer is enough…

Pros
  • - Image quality and color reproduction - Very fast and tenacious autofocus - Aperture. Allows you to work in dark rooms without a flash - Perfectly working stabilizer - Closed design with fixed size when zooming
Cons
  • - Of course the price - Unusually heavy, but you get used to it

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

A reasonable explanation for this acquisition can only be a reportage. For example, the reportage part of the wedding. Or, if due to physical limitations it is difficult to zoom in on the image with your feet. Well, the price (but not in 2022), because. in all other cases, a set of screwdriver bits (or new G, to whom it suits your taste and budget) 85 / 1.5; 135/2.0; 200 / 2.0 (this ultrasonic one) will give worse results, if we abstract from the focusing speed, and even with an installment…

Pros
  • 1. Black; 2. Heavy; 3. All weather; 4. Focusing speed; 5. Contrasting; 6. Focusing speed; 7. Stub; 8. Nikon.
Cons
  • 1. Black (in cases where you need to impress, the redneck mentality is more accustomed to white coloring); 2. The effectiveness of the stub is exaggerated in advertising; 3. The picture loses to the eternal competitor of white; 4. Weight - on the one hand, it is good, excellent balance with D3 ((x)), on the other hand, it is easy to get a disease of the spine and neck with regular professional use.