Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II AF-S Nikkor Zoom Lens - Optimized for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras (New, White Box) Review

I have been using it for more than 2 years, if there are 2 or more faces in the frame, And for landscape photography, it is better to look for something else, take Pros below: After this lens, I asked myself the question, now they are all sold. Some cons: Damn that' If you use a focal length of 70 mm, the rubber band on the zoom ring came off a little, I’ signature disease.

I don’t see the point in describing the advantages, for me this is an outrageous quality, there are no shortcomings, no matter how you say it! The next purchase is planned for 200-400, I think I will not be disappointed!

I have been using it for more than 2 years, if there are 2 or more faces in the frame, And for landscape photography, it is better to look for something else, take

Still, of course, can be more interesting in terms of quality, but in the case of reportage photography, all focal lengths are working, starting from 70mm for the big picture and ending with 200 http://fotki. http://fotki. http://fotki. How much lower is the quality level compared to the 180mm fix? I haven' very easy to use, VR allows you to take sharp handheld shots even at 1/30s.

wildlife (especially with a converter), reports, portraits, panoramas and even macro photography (with macro lenses or macro rings) Pretty sharp, but my copy at 200 I wear with D610 (850g) sometimes you need to play sports))) As for the price, Nikon is 5-6 thousand cheaper than the Canon counterpart.

Used analogues: Nikon 28 - 300 3.5-5.6, Nikon 85 1.4 I kneel, I shot a landscape at 50 mm, it’s already not easy, for me 35 1.4 is ideal for a landscape, this is definitely a portrait glass, if you are interested, examples of photos: -Portrait-sepia-001 -Portrait-of-a-beautiful-girl-2 -Fashion-photo7 Jpg Jpg -Portrait-of-a-beautiful-girl-1 -Portrait-of-a-beautiful-girl-4 and other photos on the site, on which Fields, everything was shot only with this glass.

Some pros: not yet understood! stabilization works, but it seems to me that the three steps are still embellished With its cons. ridiculous lens hood . which for some reason does not protect not from light, not from impact! and also turning the focal length ring is too big!

Despite the cons, I can hardly find anything better than this lens. In general, very satisfied. At first, I was afraid to even hold this monster in my hands, but quickly got used to it. The only downside is probably the weight. And in terms of price . there are simply no good budget televisions. With its pros. An amazing lens that gives a gorgeous picture. I often shoot a reportage from a decent distance, it gives an excellent increase. An excellent lens for shooting sports events, as well as…

As already noted, the speed and accuracy of the auto focus are fantastic. I shot city streets on the D700 at night, amazing accuracy of auto focus and notice at night ! There were no autofocus misses, but I didn’t like the stub, it doesn’t always give a guaranteed result, although shooting at a shutter speed of 1/8 with a focus of 200 mm is amazing. Different pros: I like the drawing. On an open aperture, software or soap is not observed at any focal lengths, either in the center or along the…

Pros: 1)2.8! this is logical. 2) the focus is internal, there is nothing to proboscis at all. 3) stub! unrealistically saves in some situations 4) razor sharpness 5) build quality! after six months of active use, not a speck of dust inside 6) af! it's magical. quickly, quietly wrong in 2-3 and then through my fault or because of d7000, at 750 everything is always on point. Some cons: 1) they write that it’s heavy, well, I don’t know, I’m a 49kg girl, I walk normally with it for 5 hours, but it’

Excellent glass for a reporter, naturalist and wedding artist, for the landscape it will also work, but not as good as we would like. But in fact, rarely does anyone shoot a landscape with a telephoto lens. Pros: Very fast and tenacious autofocus, works in all lighting conditions (D90), a fantastically effective stub that allows you to shoot handheld at 200 mm at shutter speeds of 1/20. Almost complete absence of HA at the edges and vignetting. Got cons: Not quite beautiful bokeh, semi-blurred…

Has pros: As many have already noted, this is a professional lens with an excellent design, dust and water protection, sharpness, a low level of aberrations (which can then be further reduced by post-processing) - no worse, if not better, than many fixed lenses in many picture parameters. Different cons: - The main drawback is the "donut" bokeh, like from inexpensive compact mirror-lens telephoto lenses. This doesn't happen often, but it does happen. At least, on a fully open hole at the long e

An excellent workhorse. Versatile, sharp, fast. Large and heavy, attach the strap only to the glass. Although I'm more into fixes, they don't weigh me down. Nikon D700 Some pros: Near instant focus. Sufficient sharpness with (F2.8) and lightness of the frame with F4 Pretty contrasty Extremely effective stabilization Does not chromate Distortion is imperceptible Cons: Weight of course . monstrous. Running from MDF to infinity takes time. I advise you to use the limiter according to the…

Instead of upgrading the carcass to a full frame, I took it and have not regretted it yet. Great for reportage and genre portraits. The only embarrassing factor is the price, so I took it in America. Some pros: I've been using it for about 6 months and I'm very happy with it. I consider it a very suitable lens for a genre portrait. I shot him in the Himalayas - there he was most welcome and showed himself perfectly. Since I used it with the D80, the stub was very useful - shutter speeds of 1/20

Good lens. It’s a pity that they can’t (or don’t want to) make 24-70mm with the same quality (in terms of dust and moisture protection), although it costs almost the same. With its pros. Excellent sharpness over the entire range of focal lengths, even at the widest aperture. As someone already wrote - fixes are now unnecessary on this focal range. Nice drawing. Basic dust and moisture protection. With its cons. As usual, the rubber parts failed . One rubber ring, which is located at the…

I have long wanted to try native system zooms, so I could not pass up the offer to sell this lens in new condition at a fabulous price. In the hands of a very high-quality thing, this is the very first tactile sensation - a heavy almost monolithic piece of metal and glass. On a class 810 camera, the balance is not bad at 750 ke is already worse, the left hand is loaded with the weight of the lens more than the right hand and quickly gets tired. Lightning-fast AF drive, at 750 ke the accuracy…

I thought between 135mm 2.0 DC and this lens . I took this one. I was afraid that it was heavy, I would quickly get tired, etc. - but no, I quickly got used to it. The stub just compensates for the easy walking of the hands from the weight (and from the wind if you shoot in the mountains). Now I don’t notice the weight of the lens, everything is fine. But what it made sense to be afraid of was a 60% useless lens hood (I compare it with a 70-300mm tamron). Otherwise, a great lens. 4 stars in…

For reportage shooting or photo walks / open-airs - the only best option (I don’t consider fixes). That's just on cropped matrices DX brings it too close, but for FX it's generally super ! when shooting for a long time, do not forget to twist the thread for the stand on the top of the lens so that your hand does not cut)) He will cut the perspective, give beautiful bokeh, give a beautiful picture - and what else is needed for happiness? )))

Great reporting lens! Sharp, low chromaticity. The stabilizer works just great! I changed my AF-S 80-200 / 2.8D to this one :) The resolution has risen dramatically + the chromaticity has noticeably decreased. + Autofocus began to work more tenaciously. On the crop it is really narrow. P. S. here they wrote about ovals in bokeh - this is the case with any lens - vignetting appears. The farther from the center - the stronger. On older lenses, as a rule, it is noticeably even stronger :)…

The lens really justifies the "Golden Ring", it's just great! Much faster and more accurate than the AF-S NIKKOR 70-300 1:4.5-5.6 G lens. With a 2x teleconverter TS-20EIII - it will be indispensable for shooting various shy animals (birds, squirrels, etc.) I compared this lens with similar lenses from other manufacturers with sigma and tamron - it wins in image quality and focusing speed.