Portraits, landscapes, and other subjects can all be captured with a shallow depth of field and a wide open aperture. Here's a picture of the situation:

I got it because I thought it would be quick, but only at open apertures between 1.8 and 8. Due to this, after taking several shots from the balcony and a few portraits, it appears that I was unfortunate. Please write if this occurs again.

For a very long time, I debated between him, the Sigma 50-200, and the whale. I also wanted to sell the camera because of the constant fsh adjustments, depressing colors, and some frustration with my "inability" (although, as much as I was looking for Yaposhka, I regret it and run home to "play" learn. Here is a brief illustration of a photo for now: p=0 * Be careful to purchase! You'll come to appreciate the value of beautiful images and stop thinking about whales altogether.

Because the 50mm f/1.8G AF-S was often too narrow for my needs (because I shoot on crop), I upgraded to this lens. It's tiny and compact, and there are no annoying creaks or squeaks. When the number 35 is worn "backwards," you can't adjust the focus of either lens. The rotation is generally smoother at 50mm; moreover, after going to the extreme position, there is the same "nut" in the extreme position, you will feel that you have reached the extreme position, and if you don't look carefully…

An outstanding lens that, after the "whale" lens, is simply lovely; I use it as a staff lens on the D7100; it has very nice clarity and a quick aperture; and for shooting in tight quarters, it's just an irreplaceable thing on a crop camera. page=2 page=2 page=2

Due to the fact that I only just bought it recently and my spare time is dominated by unimportant weather, I have not had the opportunity to put it through its paces just yet. Before making my purchase, I had serious reservations regarding the focal length of this lens; specifically, I had my sights set on an 85mm 1.8g and a Sigma 8-16mm, but neither of those options were available. After making the purchase, every skepticism was put to rest! The lens gives you the ability to photograph in…

Very specialized, but accomplishes the job perfectly 2.8 aperture is excellent for product photography and enables you to focus in low light if necessary. The image is vivid and contrasted, yet generally appears to be more intriguing. I can suggest it to individuals who are aware of its uses. You may see my images taken with the Samyang 100mm f/2.8 ED UMC Macro Canon EF lens here:

In our apartments, which have a limited amount of room, I purchased it for the purpose of photographing children. Mine, for sure))) I'm not overly happy with the d7000, the viewing angle only allows you to go so far, the autofocus motor works quietly and does not frighten the child, the background blurs well, but not significantly, but in theory, it is very difficult to use a 50 mm / 1.8 in small spaces, as you always rest against the wall.

at a reasonable cost, You can print off a test table in advance and take it with you to the store, but I also recommend checking at least two or three copies right away. Ru/users/zelengrass/album/359567/

After 18-55, this is heaven and earth! has not yet had time to reveal its full potential, Ru/users/zipixxx/view/741116/? page=3 page=3 page=2 Its pros: All of the below are correct! excellent lens, assembly, design, everything is on top! Some cons: I have not yet discovered, although the focus misses sometimes, but I have already learned to cope with it.

Together with the d3100, it is almost the size of a soap dish, of photographs can be viewed at Different pros: Sharp at f 1.8, convenient focal length for crop, light, small, inexpensive, built-in focus motor. Has some cons: Not too kosher bokeh, chromatic aberration up to f 2.8 (fixed in lightroom).

35-chka is an ideal option on Fx when shooting in clubs, excellent color reproduction, in portraits, the background is rotated with an annular scale, like the Helios 44 a super lens, Happiness has no limits, MOTO" "Helloween vol.1" were taken with this lens: Karpenko? z=albums12561064

disappointed, expected more here are some of my photos Com/file/d/0BzkNoEmq5Qn3QmxMOUhfZ3lCSlk/view? usp=sharing (ha right on the nose if you zoom in) Com/file/d/0BzkNoEmq5Qn3SXpXOElnYnpaWkk/view? usp=sharing Com/file/d/0BzkNoEmq5Qn3R0c5eEd1aFJMSTA/view? usp=sharing

and 50 then 50 I took 35 Optimal focal length (52mm on my D5100), excellent image sharpness and detail, good open bokeh - made this lens my standard lens, which I don’ it is very convenient to shoot - as you see with your eyes, but when I got used to it, the percentage of defects is no more than 5-10%, this glass is the absolute world champion in terms of price /

This glass works for me in tandem with a Nikon D3100 but when shooting in an apartment, I have been using it for more than a year and even rarely remember that there is no zoom)

I bought it, fastened it to the Nikon D3100, tried to shoot . "Well, I bought horror . " and even if you look at the PC monitor, I shot from a tripod with a closed-open aperture, but then it turned out that I replaced my D3100 with a Nikon D7000, clear, juicy, I can’t get enough of it! )) Sample photo: page=0

For adequate money, a great thing for shooting indoors, portraits, you can macro, In general, page=0 and further page=0

Lightroom makes it simple to correct any and all defects. In conjunction with the d5200, I make use of it. Completely content. When I first looked at it, I was confused because the autofocus was frequently blurry. When some time had passed, I came to the conclusion that I would no longer use a whale. I purchased it at the player, and after they checked it out, I discovered that the copy I got did not have either rear or front focus. A short while ago, I went tubing, and because the subjects…

With a crop without a screwdriver, which is most inexpensive cameras like my D60 and D3100, you need exactly such a 35mm lens; it is equivalent to a full-frame 50-ku and is considered by many to be an excellent lens. The Kit 18-55 lens has a generally applicable field of view, which means that a wide variety of subjects may be brought into sharp focus; nevertheless, the images it produces are, frankly, unremarkable. Within the same lens, there is stunning clarity of the primary subject, as…

I purchased a D3100 kit with an AF-S DX 18-55 VR lens, and I am sorry that I did not take an AF-S D bodysuit with a +35mm f/1.8G lens right away (watch out, don't tread on my rake). Has pros: I bought the lens as an indoor portrait to replace the whale 18-55 (to take a picture of a child and a wife, of course: D), well, what can I say, just earth and sky, my wife was delighted and said - "this is exactly what I wanted to get from a DSLR ". The photos are very sharp with beautiful bokeh, and the