If not for the marriage of autofocus, it would be an ordinary everyday lens, with a very versatile focal length. To demonstrate strong XA, I brought a photo taken with this lens at f2.8 (pay attention to the branches at the top). And a couple more photos to demonstrate bokeh and the overall picture as a whole. Has some pros Compact. Autofocus after purchase worked quietly and fairly accurately. My instance had no front/back focus. Affordable (for those who are not engaged in commerce, this…

Ideal for the amateur. GRIP pleasantly pleases. I photographed the coin point-blank at an angle of 30 degrees to the coin, brought the focusing current to the center of the coin, and the near edge of the coin was in focus in the picture. In general, it smears a little, but not much. To all fans - BUY! Its pros: And everything is fine with me, it focuses quickly. I put on the hood and forgot. Some cons: Chromatitis. Red lines are formed along the edges of objects photographed against a light…

Glass for such a price is very good. I think that I will use it as a staff member, because lightweight and compact. And also the picture quality is noticeably better compared to the whale. I advise all owners of DX cameras. Don't forget to check carefully in the store! Pros: Aperture, dimensions, weight, price (about 8000), sharp, beautifully blurs the background (IMHO), assembly (despite the fact that China). Optimal fixed focal length (35 mm) for DX matrices. Got cons: In my copy, the front

Don't go for expensive zooms, especially if you're new to SLR photography. Take a couple of fixes and you will understand that before that you did not shoot, but indulged. With whale lenses on DX DSLRs, you will not get anything like what you can get on fast optics. I recommend to all! Its pros: great picture, great shots in low light. Portraits are just great. The price is ridiculous for such a result. With its cons. Inaccurate focus sometimes. But this is not a disadvantage for such money.

I recommend it to all beginners, and not only amateur photographers. You have to get used to the autofocus and the norms. After the purchase, I already discovered a 50mm lens with manual iris control, and the seed of doubt was sown. But, in any case - 35mm is a necessary thing. Its pros: A very handy thing. And as many write here, this is a "must have" for amateur photographers. I recommend. Its cons: Haven't found any obvious yet. Lack of manual aperture control, if you can imagine it?!

Very good lens, I recommend. If it could be used at full frame on any apertures, there would be no price at all. But it was calculated for crop, so in general its setting to full frame is a pleasant surprise, and there is nothing to complain about. Got pros: An excellent fast lens for relatively little money. Sharp, contrasty, with good color reproduction. Draws pretty well, much more beautiful than budget zooms. Small, light. Blend included. The most interesting thing is that with an…

I bought it as a fast lens for night shooting and shooting with a lack of light in the city. For me, a great addition came out to the AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II. However, it is worth taking a drive before buying it for rent or from friends in order to draw a conclusion for yourself whether to take one or not. Its pros: For a photo amateur like me, a great fast lens for little money. Cons: Autofocus somehow doesn't work very well, or my hands are crooked.

The lens is still very good, despite the listed shortcomings. The picture is very sharp and colorful. The only serious drawback, in my opinion, is the presence of pronounced HA, in areas with high contrast, which intensify towards the edges of the frame. Pros: - excellent image sharpness; - excellent color rendition; - light coloured; - Pretty fast autofocus - Supported mode M / A - fine-tuning the focus manually; - filters do not rotate when focusing (if installed); - light;…

Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX is my first fix. I decided that if the camera is already "initial" (Nikon D3000), then the optics will be for beginners. Only this wonderful lens is quite an "adult" ! Yes, it’s by no means a top glass, but the lens is quite good in terms of image quality and build quality. The first photos from him led to children's delight (before that, only the whale was 18-55). I was looking for a fast lens for comfortable shooting indoors without a flash. The most affordable…

Static lenses are considered to be sharper and better - than those with focal length - for example - from 18-55 - now I completely agree with this opinion - and I want to wish creative success to everyone! and understand that this lens will be able to capture reality even more beautifully - than you are able to see it - buy - if you are ready for it! Pros: supernatural lens - finally \u003d I began to understand - at least something about art photography - sharp - light and color - strong…

I bought a D3100 kit Af-S DX 18-55 VR, now I regret that I didn’t immediately take a + 35mm f / 1.8G AF-S D bodysuit, don’t step on my rake;) Has pros: I bought the lens as an indoor portrait to replace the whale 18-55 (to take a picture of a child and a wife, of course: D), well, what can I say, just earth and sky, my wife was delighted and said - "this is exactly what I wanted to get from a DSLR ". The photos are very sharp with beautiful bokeh, plus the process itself becomes more…

I bought it in Hong Kong for 6500, despite the fact that in Hong Kong we had such a minimum for 7300, I was very pleased, as I wrote above, it turned out to be very convenient for me, it’s what I need for the room, excellent sharpness and, in general, a “picture”. Small size and weight - which is important! Pros: - metal bayonet; - small size and weight; - convenient focal length 35mm (at least for me); -excellent sharpness and "image" compared to the 18-55VR kit lens Cons: I didn’t find it,

The sharpness of this glass is better than 50 mm 1.8 G, I sold my fifty dollars and bought this one in its place. An excellent angle for crop, especially in tight spaces. There are no alternatives for this money. Whoever talks about misses, learn to shoot. At the minimum focusing distance, its flu is 1 cm at an open aperture. and even less. Whoever talks about what he thinks, then this is a sore of all high-aperture glasses. Those that do not suffer from this are many times more expensive. So I

A great addition for cropped amateur cameras. Most useful for reporting at dusk, when the "whale" is already blind. For portraits - well, you can shoot, but it gives distortion and is not very sharp in the open. Only if for growth, a maximum of waist, when you can’t run far with fifty dollars. Has some pros aperture "Normal" (like the human eye) viewing angle for crop. Allows you to shoot at dusk (still better with an external flash) Very light, suitable for travel. Good equipment (pouch, both…

In general, the lens for this price is not bad. There is also Nikkor 50 f1.8D which is also very good, although cheaper than 35 mm, but "screwdriver". Here, as they say, it's up to you - which focal lengths do you like best. Has pros: For me, 35 mm is a very convenient focal length. Sharp already at F / 2.0 Nice drawing and colors. Weight, dimensions. Quiet and moderately fast autofocus. Well "soaps" the background. With a motor, suitable for all initial models of "carcasses". Some cons…

A very successful lens. A focal length of 35mm on a non-full frame body will provide a viewing angle approximately equal to the angle of human vision, and therefore this lens is standard, optimal for crop. Convenient to use indoors. Different pros: Sharp, fast, light, fast. It has an autofocus motor. Tough autofocus. Filter diameter 52 mm - quite common among budget lenses, for example, the same for whale 18-55 / 3.5-5.6 Got cons: Chromatic aberrations and slight barrel distortion. Edge…

I took it to the Nikon D3100 - now the whale lens is gathering dust in the bag, I have never changed this charm. As a staff member for DX cameras - that's it. Adequate price / quality ratio. I am completely satisfied with the resulting photos and the work of the lens. Has some pros A very good assembly, albeit China. Nice equipment: the lens itself, a case and a hood. Size and weight. Now you can easily carry it in your bag without worrying that the bulky lens will rest against your side…

A must have for every owner of a cropped Nikon camera! A lens for every day. I bought it three years ago, since then I have bought / sold / tried different lenses. But 35 is as it was, and is, and I'm not going to part with it. Its pros: Compact. Sharp wide open, razor sharp closed down. Light coloured. Inexpensive. Autofocus. Bayonet fastening - metal. Cons below: The focus ring is a little loose. However, there are no front / back focuses on my copy, so I almost always trust autofocus.

An excellent lens for its price. Serves as a regular lens for several years. Attempts to replace him have failed. The only lens that I liked more is the Nikkor 35 1.4 for over the money. Alternatives from sigma tamrons, in terms of the totality of requirements, turned out to be worse and more expensive. Got pros: -Good sharpness from wide aperture. Sharpness is maximum already at f / 4, there is practically no center-edge difference at all aperture values. -Compactness -Price -Ultrasonic motor…

In general, only positive impressions. If you haven’t shot with fixed lenses yet, be sure to try it, the sensations are completely different. Some pros: My first prime lens. Before that, there was a zoom of 18-140. I hesitated for a long time before buying, but the desire to try something new outweighed. And I never regretted it. I installed it and since then I have been shooting only on it (even landscapes, although I originally planned to use it exclusively for subject photography). Photos…