- Superb sharpness even with the aperture all the way open The lens produces a high-quality image overall. Compact size Aperture\sPrice
- Not even close to being the most practical focus length on the crop. In summary, there are virtually no drawbacks to speaking about in relation to the cost of the product, with the exception of a very visible lens hood play and some looseness of the focus ring (perhaps a feature of my copy).
- aperture and sharpness that come from nature
- All of our flaws are internal, and the camera is only a tool to help us see them.
- Glass that is outstanding in every way. A very great image with everything present, including sharpness with an open (the most important thing is to get into the flu), color, and bokeh, and resistance to backlight, as well as reasonable macro (macro 1: 1 if you just want to), and a motor. The distance is relatively manageable, which is fantastic news for the crop. It is now being captured by a second camera; the previous model, the 5100, has been replaced by the 7100, and the lens appears to be much more advanced than before.
- In some circumstances, not suited for FX cameras. Nonetheless, many people use it in a manner that involves a bang. Auto focus that has a satisfactory level of speed. There are pink windows, which are my wife's favorite, but I destroy them as soon as I put them in the converter.
- 1. Easy to carry and not very big. 2. A lens hood is a part of the package (although it helps infrequently). 3. Aperture. A working aperture of 1.8 is highly useful. 4. Because of the appropriate angle, this figure can serve as a member of the staff. 5. Relatively inexpensive. 6. An extremely quick autofocus. 7. Extremely high sharpness, which is likely even higher than that of the Nikon 50 1.8 D.
- By taking into account the cost, the lens does not have any drawbacks. Plasticity does not detract from its strength, lenses with focusing problems are not so common, and the fact that with a protective filter it desperately glares is completely solved by removing the filter.
- Lightweight, compact, and has a nice appearance when mounted on the d5100. I bought the 18-55 as an addition to the kit for the purpose of taking portraits; however, I ended up not using the kit at all because, with the exception of the viewing angle, this 35mm is much more superior to the kit in every other regard. When compared to a whale, the aperture of a 35mm is approximately seven times higher (you can shoot at 100 iso with the same shutter speeds as with a whale at 800 iso under the same conditions), it creates a background blur that is significantly better than that of a whale, and it focuses significantly more quickly and precisely. The percentage of sharp images taken with this lens is disproportionately higher than those taken with the 18-55, which is actually quite pleasing given the depth of field is much reduced while shooting at an aperture of 1.8 as opposed to 4.5. (whale aperture at 35mm).
- viewing angle. Yet, this is not a drawback but rather a feature of the product. You only need to have the awareness that panoramic photos cannot be taken successfully. To accomplish this, you will require a different lens.
- 1. Aperture (in conditions in which it would be impossible to read a book - it shoots like it's daytime, though at ISO 1600 and higher, and the shutter speed is somewhere between 1/5 and 1/10 of a second) On the other hand, there is not a great deal of noise visible in the picture. 2. The lens is small and lightweight, even with the hood mounted; beyond the 18-200mm range, it almost looked like there was no lens at all. 3. It does a great job of washing off the backdrop (called bokeh) and making the whole picture feel airier. The focus area is crisp, and I'd even go so far as to say it's naturally crisp. This means there is no soapiness or artificiality, but I didn't detect either. 4. To me, the focal length of 35 millimeters is the crop sensor's "golden mean" and "staff" (I put it on the d7000). 5. Despite the description calling for 30cm, it can focus as close as 15cm to the front lens and yet give a picture that is good and on level with that of fixed (if 1x2 meters are not going to print an image of a ladybug or a flower). When shooting an object from a distance of 15-20 cm with an aperture of 1.8, the depth of field will be around 1 millimeter. This means that an aperture of f/5.6 or higher is required to achieve 100% clarity across the image, even at small scales such as those found in insects, spiders, flowers, and jewelry. 6. Fantastically functional and lightweight lens hood. 7. seven-tined diaphragm (beautiful circles in bokeh). 8. Filters of the UV variety and others cost very little, and their filter diameter is only 52 millimeters. 9. USM is more of an advantage than a disadvantage (though I personally think that 35 or 50 mm doesn't matter, as they typically don't disable the dynamics in these situations). 10. Mounting bracket made of metal. 11. Beginning with version 1.8, the vignetting in my copy is completely absent.
- Doesn't take pictures of themselves (1). Other from that, however, everything is to be expected, and there is nothing particularly faultworthy about the current scenario. It's too bad it doesn't fit the entire frame, but at least you can sell it in tandem with the carcass. Because of this, the incompatibility issues will be resolved. That's an option you could think about. 3 The autofocus actually misses by plus or minus one to two cm, but with a narrow depth of field like 1.8 or even 2.8, you certainly won't photograph ice skating, boxing, or running kids (too tiny depth of field, in my opinion, for such duties), so for leisurely shooting, it's OK.
- a high degree of clarity and specificity.
- It does not have a stabilizer.
- - brightness - cheap (purchased at a reputable internet store; with delivery to my city, it turned out to be something about 8) - lightness and portability - metal bayonet - versatility
- if there is not enough light, autofocus will not work. - It's eerie when you put on or take off the hood (the force on the latch is significant)
- Ring focus, filter size, and aperture with seven blades
- A few minor complaints about the workmanship and the autofocus being off.