It is not appropriate to debate this, comrades. This is an absolute must. This Nikkor 50mm 1.8 lens is the fix that every amateur photographer needs to have in their bag. Light, brilliant, and sharp, while also being lovely and affordable. Capturing images in dimly lit environments or indoors is a fun challenge. After switching to 18-105mm, a significant improvement can be seen in the images. Before buying, I doubted taking Nikkor 50mm 1.8 or 50mm 1.4 (Nikon or Sigma). There is definitely a…

Didn't like the lens. Possibly, when he gets the shot right, he produces a good photograph; however, working with him is a frustrating and unpleasant experience. This is true even when using a high-end camera like the Nikon D750. To begin, when the lens is being focused, it produces a very obnoxious and loud noise, continually idling the focus back and forth while gradually slowing down in extreme positions with some kind of bumps and pops. The focus is sluggish and frequently off, somewhere in

Only five times were they captured on camera, and they all came to the same conclusion: they were wasting their money ((( Everyone agrees that the bokeh effect in images is distracting, and that they would rather observe the depth of field instead. In the kitchen, I attempted to take a picture of how three cats eat, climbing as high as on a stool in the far corner; however, the cats' tails were too large to fit in the frame. When I finally finished switching out the lens, it was too late for…

Everyone writes about bokeh that has been cut up and looks nasty. I have no idea, but bokeh is one of my favorite effects. If you do not engage in photo-onanism and do not scrutinize the pictures pixel by pixel, then you will never discover the so-called "nuts" that are contained within your photographs. Those who say that the downsides include not having a focus motor built in to the device are someone I just don't comprehend. This is a technical aspect of the lens that you may see here. The…

obtained for the price of D90. You should write: - misses. (okay, maybe a couple of times for a hundred frames, and even then, I suppose it's not his fault, but rather from too much trust being placed in his powers.) My situation presents a unique challenge, which I've outlined in the deficiencies; there are times when it just is unable to concentrate at all. - concentrating very carefully. can take place on any camera model or instance, regardless of the camera. The focusing experience on the…

- An exceptional lens for day-to-day use with a full-frame camera (FX), which causes the camera to become smaller, lighter, and more handy; as a result, you end up carrying it around with you more frequently. - Clarity may be achieved at an aperture of f/2.2; at f/5.6, the clarity is so high that it appears as though a portion of the world has been compressed into the scanner. At an aperture of f/1.8, the clarity is the same but in the DX region. Beyond f/16, contrast and saturation begin to…

According to the statistics, this lens is almost always the first one to be attached to the camera after the whale, and I am certainly not an exception! This lens, when used skillfully, enables you to make portraits on the street that are of a sufficiently high quality, incomparable with those made with the "whale." The stronger blurring of the background gives the photo volume, which is more important in the "street" portrait; even the light is less important than it is when compared to it in…

Budget option fifty dollars. I recommend it if there is still not enough money for more expensive fast fixed lenses. He will honestly work out his work and, if the photographer wishes, he will even rework it. With its pros. -Aperture fast -Compact, even if you put it in your pocket -Great start for a beginner photographer (low price, good bokeh) - Lenses in it are located so that it is quite difficult to scratch them. Only, well, a very sloppy owner will allow this =) Its cons: - There is…

Excellent portrait glass on the crop, in fact, the fact that it is not very sharp can even be a significant plus, for example, in portrait shooting, because it covers the problems associated with the skin. Very nice and plastic picture. The lens is very comfortable and light. I use it with a Nikon D7000 Very good glass for its price, everyone should have it! Different pros: Aperture Price (I took a bu for 2700) good bokeh A very light and compact lens (all my girl friends love this lens…

Great glass for great money. I was very afraid to buy such a simple lens. I took it from a girl, took two shots and everything became clear. Bought it the next day. I don't regret it much. Perhaps in terms of photo quality, this is the best glass I have ever had. Has pros: Great clear glass! Quality. Reliability. The ability to twist the aperture ring (can be used with a converter) Cons: There is no motor (but personally I think that this is not a drawback, almost everywhere there are motors in

Chose from 50mm f1.8d and 50mm f1.8g. I chose 50mm f1.8d because of the two 50mm f1.8g lenses, neither of them could hit 0 when checking for focus, and only the 50mm f1.8d could do it at a price almost 2 times lower. I don’t sin about focusing on the d7000, because He is only after adjustment in the SC. Has some pros Sharpness by 5 points, no front, no back focus. Focusing speed may not be instant, but not slow on the d7000 either. The price is only 2 times more than the adapter for…

the price-quality ratio is excellent. I recommend it to those who want a good lens and do not want to pay a lot of money for it. Boo. costs ~3.5 thousand Different pros: - sharp - little chromate due to aperture 1.8 and not 1.4. Although different tests show different results. - ringing sharpness appears at f2.2 Cons below: - focus ring spins - the principle of operation of a screwdriver (focuses more slowly. It is difficult to shoot in motion) - noisy - not familiar to me focal length of…

In general, a very successful model. I must say that it is much sharper and better (in visual comparison) than the similar one from canon (they were compared on cameras d200 and 30d, respectively). He makes 100% of his money. Well suited for the studio and in the open air as a universal one. I do not recommend users to close the aperture more than f / 8 - it starts to soap (design features).

Good glass for amateur photographer, suitable as a portrait lens, for some landscape shots and limited for subject matter. Exceptionally sharp at medium apertures. For an advanced amateur photographer, a must have and a step towards high-quality optics. Its pros: The image quality at apertures 4-5.6 is amazing. Lightweight, strong. Has cons: Backlash front element, dry uncomfortable focusing ring with a small stroke.

If you do not have a "younger" camera model, take it without hesitation. For this money, I just fell in love with this lens and don’t let go of it) But if you have a model for beginners, then keep in mind that you will have to turn the autofocus on your own, it takes time, plus misses quite often With its pros. In good light it gives excellent colors, fast aperture, sharp enough, good bokeh, very light, and of course the price With its cons. On the "younger" models, autofocus does not work. I…

I bought it as a cheap version of a portrait lens on a crop. For filming together, when the main 1.4G is used by the wife. It shoots excellently for its money, but the money is small and the quality is corresponding. Better than a "whale", but worse than any brothers . Has some pros 1. Lightweight. 2. Compact. 3. Fast. 4. Quite sharp from aperture 2.2. 5. So cheap that it is a must for everyone who is not going to invest a lot of money in equipment. Has cons: 1. Soaps in comparison with…

There were no questions asked during the photo shoot. Autofocus works well, but in manual mode, it can do wonders for those 5k. I took regular lenses from friends - the quality is disgusting, in poor lighting, fog or twilight it opens the flash, and this one takes excellent photos without using the flash, but if you use a tripod, you can see a small miracle) Has some pros Fast and accurate aiming. In low light, it takes quite good and saturated pictures. There is almost no distortion. Unzoomed.

I don’t understand how you can write about focus if the lens is without a motor ?! With my D3000, it is only manual! :)) But this does not bother me at all and does not bother me. That's what hands are for! I even manage to shoot butterflies without autofocus. Got pros: Price! Aperture, sharpness, color reproduction, compact size, etc. etc. I also like that the lens is deepened, no hoods are needed. Has cons: Well, if you really find fault - the diaphragm is "spanner".

Different pros: For such money - only manual focusing. And here, even without a motor - but quite a good autofocus. I use it on a FF camera, Tamron 24-70 G2 is also available. So, on the tamron, of course, the class is visible (sharpness, colors, XA, vignette - everything is better) - but this cheap fix is ​​at least comparable to a large and expensive (70 tr) reporter. If your camera supports a screwdriver and you want a fix - take it easy. I've had it since 2022 and it's still in service…

This lens has helped more than once, where I didn’t want to use a flash, although ISO still needs to be raised. And if you need to remove the shoulder strap indoors, it’s better to invent it for its price. A few days ago I had to take a walk in the woods after dinner. After 16-00, the whale lens was not enough, hung up fifty dollars and finished shooting, though you need to take into account the FR when cropping and no more, that is, stomp your feet. From the Must have series!