Panasonic LUMIX H-H025E-K 25mm Silver Lens for G Series - Micro Four Thirds Camera Review

Just a great portrait for the money. I use it in conjunction with the G7, it shows itself perfectly. It is problematic to shoot video on it because of the focal length and the lack of a stub, although it depends more on desire.

Satisfied - like an elephant. I bought it just the other day for landscape astrophotography, but so far I have not been able to take pictures in this genre: the weather does not allow. However, today's walk in the park with this lens made me very happy! As I get to the night sky with him, I will add a review. Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II camera, minimal processing. I got to the relatively night sky: from the balcony . The sky cleared at last, and I could not help but take advantage of this…

Who writes that he is stupid in the video . umm . well, I don’t know. I don't get dull. Tapnul on the screen - chik - aimed. no problem. I am attaching three frames: 2 photos on the beach and a freeze frame from a 4k video. here are the shots that I shot for my site: views of the city. The first three minutes were filmed with this 25mm. Video in 4k shot - turn it on. https://youtu. Be/PPWu0SJnncw And I think that a very good MICROCONTRAST for the money. Better than sigma. Hence the good work in

I like this model. I rarely use it to record videos and photos. The colors are very good and natural. The lens is sharp and there is not much difference between f2 and f5. I shoot myself, sometimes autofocus jumps, but I think it's the fault of the carcass, not the lens. I am satisfied with the quality, the lens is plastic and for me it is rather a plus - there is no excess weight. I recommend to buy. The difference with the whale is very big. Such a lens will add artistry to your pictures…

Pros: Constructive sharpness Aperture yes, and everything else. Its cons: Well, with a stretch, you can "get to the bottom" of the materials, the plastic is rustic, loose and cheap in appearance. But it doesn't affect the quality of the photo, does it? No.

Pros below: Lightweight, relatively compact, fast and very affordable classic "fifty dollars" for the MFT. With its cons. There are noticeable chromatic aberrations on the Olympus. As far as I know, there is no such thing on Panasonic cameras.

I liked everything, and I thought it had a fantastic lens; however, it is unfortunate that it does not have a stabilizer; if it did, there would be a stub, and then everything would be ideal.

I fully admit that the Olympus analogue can be better, but for 7 thousand at the time of purchase from this Panasonic, I repeat, there simply were no competitors. It's a pity that, as usual, such super-offers reach our market very rarely. With its pros. The lens was purchased in one of the American online stores on sale in honor of Black Friday for $99. For this money, even taking into account the subsequent delivery to 2022, he has no competitors in principle. Apart from the price, it is…

In general, I’m satisfied, I’m an eternal amateur student, I’ve seen enough reviews about fixes and fifty dollars, I bought it and I don’t regret it)

I liked the slightly softer drawing of the photos and the colors. In almost all respects, amateur photos do not require post-processing. Its "handwriting" compared, for example, with Sigma 30 mm Art. Got pros: Optical characteristics, light weight and reasonable price, design. Fast autofocus! Therefore, I postponed the purchase of Lumix 20 mm. With its cons. He is somehow fragile tactilely, a careful attitude suggests itself, so I don’t know whether to take him on a hike, where there is…

The price-quality ratio is perfect. You don’t have to expect some kind of super high-quality picture, but for a lens with a price of 11 thousand, this is just a fairy tale.

The lens, of course, is cool, but not perfect. Important: when shooting video, focusing is very slow, and if the subject quickly changes position, then it is almost impossible to focus at all. Video is not the strong point of this lens. And everything else is great. Personally, I liked it. Pros below: 1. Aperture (even indoors in natural light, shutter speed is only 1/60 sec, and ISO is not higher than 250 units.) 2. Smooth focus ring (it's nice to focus manually) 3. Autofocus speed (very…

For a long time I chose between Olimpus 25mm / f1.8 and 20mm from Panasonic, and yet the price did its job. Since the differences are not significant (I watched a lot of video reviews) and the price is half the price.

I liked everything, for my money, a good lens, it’s a pity that there is no stabilizer, there would be a stub, everything would be perfect

I will say right away - I bought used glass. To find it for an adequate price, I had to strain, basically everything is sold for 9-10 thousand, that is, almost at the price of a new one. For such money it is better to take a new one with a guarantee. It should be borne in mind that the lens is not very "bokeh", it can be better. Although this is not so much a problem of the lenses as of the system - there is background blur, but on the micro 4/3 system it is in principle not as highly artistic,

A high-quality budget fix with a beautiful and sharp picture, which works predictably and understandably, at a very nice price, very often hangs on discounts or even as a gift for a new camera. The picture is sharp, easy to use, it focuses quickly on the G80, on the whole it left an exceptionally pleasant feeling, so if you need a regular fix for all occasions for an inexpensive price, this is for him

An excellent lens for photographing young children, fast autofocus, focusing on the face and eyes works great. The percentage of marriage when photographing small fidgets with this lens is minimal. At the same time, the lens blurs the background perfectly and beautifully. Must-have lens. More versatile than the 45mm from the Olympus, the Olympus is difficult to shoot in a small room, you have to huddle in corners, and when shooting group portraits you have to move away at a great distance…

Far from being a specialist in photography, but I really liked the lens - fast (focus), sharp enough at the maximum aperture (at least for me), aperture is just super - even on my old panasonic - G1 can be shot handheld indoors with minimal lighting What can we say about more advanced models. The lens is quite versatile. Places with a camera take up little, you can just carry it with you in your bag at least every day. Definitely a must have for owners of cameras with an MFT mount.

I bought a lens not for artistic photography, but simply for shooting indoors. He does an excellent job with this task. With normal room lighting, it allows you to shoot with a short shutter speed at ISO800 - quite working for modern carcasses. Outdoors, the picture is clear and sharp. In portrait shooting, the background blur is weak - the small real focal length affects. This forces a more careful approach to the choice of background. If you want bokeh on a mic, look towards Olympus 45/1.8…

This lens was a must for shooting in low light and for the depth I can get with such a low aperture. It's understandable and extremely useful for the price. This is my new lens for the day. I use a Panasonic Lumix GH-4 that shoots cinematic 4k.