Pros
- Camera
Cons
- Screen flickering Battery Memory
Pros
- camera, screen, 120 hertz smoothness which I see.
Cons
- autonomy, exynos processor
Pros
- 1. Gorgeous screen: excellent color reproduction, maximum viewing angles, excellent readability in bright sunlight. 2. Fast LPDDR5 memory. 3. Ability to expand permanent memory using micro SD cards. 4. Extensive functionality. 5. Good performance. 6. Dust and moisture protection according to IP 68 standard. 7. Good stereo speakers. 8. Convenient interface.
Cons
- 1. PWM that kills the eyes when using the screen for a long time. This is the disease of all Samsung phones. 2. Stupid rounded edges that do not carry any functional load (we are talking about the Edge panel) and because of which a protective glass cannot be used. They ostensibly give the phone a special premium look, but in fact, this is just marketing. The silicone film does not protect the screen, I already broke it by dropping the smartphone. 3. Terrible focus. Especially in low light. No firmware ates will fix it, it is technically impossible to do. 4. A hundredfold digital zoom is pure marketing, it is absolutely useless. 5. Why does a smartphone need 12 gigs of RAM, and even more so, 16? To cost more? 6. The under-screen unlock sensor is just disgusting! Sometimes it refuses to work at all, despite repeated attempts to unlock it. You have to enter the code manually. And this despite the lack of protective glass! 7. The same can be said about unlocking with the front camera. Doesn't work in low light, doesn't recognize when wearing sunglasses. 8. The phone is quite heavy and massive, it barely fits in a pocket. Although, this is rather not a minus, but a necessity with such a screen diagonal and battery size. 9. The camera block sticks out a lot, although this can be fixed by wearing a thick protective case, but then the phone, already large, becomes even more massive. If the cover is not used, there is a risk of damage to the unit. 10. Another big minus is low autonomy, despite a powerful 5000 mAh battery. And this is despite the fact that I never use a screen refresh rate of 120 Hz and I have the dimming mode enabled on a permanent basis, which, in theory, should save up to 40% of the energy consumed by the screen. But my phone barely lasts until the evening . What will happen to it if you turn on 120 Hz and a light theme? Enough for half a day of active use? Problem with optimization? 11. Exynos 990. 12. Price $1400. I think it is unreasonably high, considering all of the above.
Pros
- Good performance, nothing hangs or bugs 120Hz smoothness for the eyes Large screen for internet surfing and games Good response to pressure Good design
Cons
- Fits quickly even when not in use The screen in the sun itself quickly reduces the brightness without allowing use The cameras lather and watercolor the faces in the photo. Photos are obtained if you slightly enlarge watercolors with poor focus. Only the selfie camera has excellent focus and the main cameras do not. Poor wifi reception Zoom is useless The glass of the camera block breaks easily In a case, the phone is just a shovel inconvenient, but without a case it is impossible because it is easily scratched
Pros
- most importantly - 120 hertz screen.
Cons
- But there is always a but - and this is the camera. She is chic, but she sticks out, maybe I'm finding fault, she sticks out for everyone, but for this model it sticks out even through the cover. Still, it was necessary, after all, to squeeze in all these cameras somehow. Hope it doesn't scratch
Pros
- 1) Samsung screen, but it has always been the best 2) Camera 3) work speed 4) 5g 5) battery 6) charging speed (super fast charge) this is the best phone on the market, 20 laptop came out the size is the same as 20
Cons
- 1) the camera sticks out very much, which creates an excessive thickness of the device 2) large weight and size, a person with small hands or short fingers will find the phone uncomfortable, even I am sometimes afraid that the camera does not outweigh and fall out of my hand
Pros
- - Screen if your eyes are not sensitive to PWM - 120 hertz giving smoothness, but eating batteries . - Less than on the predecessors the amount of pre-installed unnecessary software
Cons
- - Eats the battery as if not in itself. - Total 128 GB. on board and no options with memory size - Dimensions, or rather marketing dimensions, body thickness 8.8 is stated, in reality, according to the camera unit 12 mm - The camera unit will not hide any adequate cover - Equipment - Resonating cabinet from built-in speaker - The weight - Price - Autofocus, which does not work from the word at all. And permanently. - Noisy camera matrices, the results of which they tried to fix programmatically - The post-processing of the photos is terrible
Pros
- Design, screen
Cons
- Battery, camera, buggy, poor connection
Pros
- Three cameras translated into 35mm equivalent lenses: a) ultra wide angle 13mm, 12 megapixel without stabilization. the image from the matrix is programmatically zoomed 1.8x from 0.5 to 0.9x b) wide-angle 25mm, 108 MP Nonacell matrix with OIS stabilization, the image from which is programmatically zoomed up to 6x in the shooting mode [4:3 108mp] and up to 3.9x in the mode [4:3; 16:9; 1:1 and Full]. In [4:3; 16:9; 1:1 and Full] image size is 12 megapixels, due to the combination of 9 photodiodes under one filter (red, green, blue) into one "super pixel", which allows you to expand the dynamic range (different exposures of photodiodes under 1 filter) or reduce noise in poor lighting conditions (the sum of information from 9 photodiodes reduces noise). In the [4:3 108mp] mode, 9 photodiodes are debayerized already under different filters, which provides detail (reducing the range) c) telephoto lens 103mm, 48MP with OIS stabilization, turns on when zooming 4x in mode [4:3; 16:9; 1:1 and Full] and up to 100x zoomed by software (with resulting quality). But since in the [4:3; 16:9; 1:1 and Full] the image is no more than 4000x3000 (12MP) and 103mm optics cannot resolve 48 megapixels pixel by pixel for effective zooming, as well as the need for a margin of pixels around the frame for the software stabilizer to work (if available), at best, the quality is higher 8x zoom is not worth counting With this in mind, the pros are: 1. Excellent stabilization, good headroom for handheld shooting in poor lighting conditions, and incl. on a telephoto lens 2. Good dynamic range of all three cameras at low ISO 3. Sharpness in the center of the frame 4. The presence of 13mm and 103mm as separate cameras is universal (in s20 and s20 + there is no telephoto lens and optical zoom, zooming is carried out with a 26mm 64mp matrix) 5. Larger 1/1.33" ISOCELL Bright HM1 sensor (was 1/2.5" before). 6. Increase the range or reduce noise by combining 9 diodes of one filter into 1 pixel
Cons
- 1. In PRO mode. 13mm and 103mm cameras are not included. Zooming occurs only due to the 25mm camera matrix. This is for me the most inexplicable work of Samsung. 2. Also in the [4:3 108MP] mode, the 13mm and 103mm cameras do not turn on. Samsung apparently implies that since they do not have 108mp, then they are not suitable for this mode. But the meaning for the user is different - the inclusion of the maximum resolution from the cameras. In this mode, 13.25 and 103mm cameras could work with images at 1220228 and 48 megapixels, respectively, providing ease of use. But no, Samsung thought that since it set the selection to [4:3 108mp], then when shooting, there would be no need to quickly switch to other cameras. 3. As a result, it is not possible to set a 48mp image when shooting at 103mm. Frame only 4000x3000 pixels (12mp). At the same time, the matrix is \u200b\u200ba usual Bayer, not Nonacell (for the possibility of digital zooming up to 100x) with a size of 1\2", why such a limitation is not clear. 4. Inconveniently implemented exposure adjustment in the "Photo" mode. It is necessary to press on the object, a scale appears, which must be adjusted in time, while it is designated as brightness adjustment. And I would like a separate "Exposure" button or even menu settings for the photo. 5. There are no color settings, sharpening, noise reduction, etc. for the image. The way the image conversion from the matrix to jpg is configured by Samsung does not suit me. or have to suffer with raw 6. Strong noise reduction with artifacts in low light conditions, which indicates the noise of the 108MP sensor (even in super pixel mode) and 48MP All shortcomings are software, and could be improved by an ate if desired by Samsung
Pros
- Screen Frame beautiful appearance Premium performance
Cons
- Victim of marketing Big and heavy Slippery Useless zoom Eats Aakum godlessly No cover)
Pros
- Not! Is that the staff who helped determine the purchases.
Cons
- Can't send feedback!
Pros
- Design. Screen. Camera
Cons
- It's buggy. Cold battery.
Pros
- Screen, photo.
Cons
- Removed the Bixby key. Price.
Pros
- The screen, sound, gesture control, all this is good.
Cons
- there are a lot of shortcomings here. Exynos phone. in everyday use of standard applications, everything is ok, but as soon as you start, games, for example, are not something that sags fps, but in general often just lags, slows down, freezes. it's like a flagship for 100 thousand? according to all reviews on Snapdragon, there are no such moments, everything is perfect there, as it should be. camera. Yes, the pictures are good for the most part. but with quite a bit of dim light, sooooo often there is simply no focus. from the word at all. doesn't fix anything. Photos come out like on an old nokia with a 1.3 megapixel camera. 100x zoom is just a toy for several times. not worth it to buy this model for her sake. fashionable to take s20+. autonomy is something, too. With such a capacious battery, the phone should hold a charge for 1.5 days with active use. In fact, I charge 2 times a day. It's good that at least there is fast charging. strongly protruding camera also carries a lot of inconvenience. There are no adequate covers that will cover the camera with a protrusion. the frame in the cases protrudes a tenth of a mm above the camera, which in fact does not protect it in any way. There are no protective glasses, only plastic analogues, which scratch extremely quickly and affect the quality of the photo. that is, either a dumb case or lining on the camera, or walking without protection.
Pros
- worthy for its price, camera
Cons
- did not find, the wife is happy
