🔌 TP-Link TL-WN725N 150 Mbps Wireless-N Nano USB Adapter 2.4 GHz - Black, TPLink: Compact and Reliable Wireless Connection Review

The speed that can be achieved over wifi is pretty slow; it reminded me of the speed that can be achieved when downloading images via a telephone cable. In a general sense, it is suitable for attaching a PC, particularly in circumstances where pulling the wiring would be difficult or lazy.

Under Windows XP 32Bit, the installation of firewood 2022 was required. Before that, he threw out a blue screen - see the discussions. Why do people love Windows? So that the "programmers" have enough for bread .

there was a goal so that if the main Internet disappears on a stationary computer, the Internet was always there - through wi-fi, which will distribute the phone. that is, in fact, a kind of backup channel. This adapter did the job.

I noticed that many who write that the device does not work well do not understand the logic and principles of the wi-fi technology. Only one thing can be advised on this - to study the materiel. Some pros: Stable reliable dongle. On Linux distributions, after installing the driver, it works stably and without problems. It's the same on WinXP. Has some cons: After installing the drivers from the manufacturer's website, I did not find it.

I was looking for an adapter that will get up without drivers and kernel modules on Ubuntu 16.04. This is the first one I've found. Very satisfied. Some pros: Communication without loss of speed and without interruptions, small, there is even a flashing indicator, inexpensive, does not heat up (contrary to previous reviews), the range is large enough Has some cons: : The case broke after about a year (the cover flies off), but the adapter itself continues to work.

This is my first Wi-Fi receiver and a strong disappointment. Confidently receives a signal only when you sit under the router. At 5 meters and line of sight from the router, the signal goes out 2 times, after 10 meters it is completely lost. Also, walls are contraindicated for him. Outcome - thrown away.

It is better to take something more expensive, otherwise if you want to intercept, it will do for a couple of months, but no more. Has some pros: I expected more from this device. There were no problems in the settings. Cons: Lost connection all the time. There were also stable periods of work. The signal does not hold very confidently, two divisions on the indicator.

I bought 4 pieces, one refused to work, they tried it on different computers and wasps, after about 6 attempts it stopped even being recognized, I didn’t apply to ss, because for such a price there is more hemorrhoids

As for the drawback, when I connect Bluetooth headphones, it drops to 300-600 kb / s. Fixed with aux cable on headphones (another topic).

Actual for TL-WN725N Ver:2.0 - It was possible to raise the access point on Windows XP x32 only after setting up a network connection and completely disabling the firewall. On Windows 7 x32 and Windows 7 x64, it was not possible to start the adapter in access point mode (SoftAP). Conclusions that I made for myself in the process of using: - Do not try to use the adapter as an access point. - Torrents are contraindicated. - Install only drivers (do not install the utility). From the tray…

The soft AP worked by itself in W7x64. but not immediately, but only after _turning on_ the firewall. I measured the speed as a client, connecting to the Dir-300 at a distance of about 10 meters: the speed on speedtest. Net is 1.5-2 times lower than when using the "old" D-Link DWL-G520 with a PCI interface. Initially, I took a dongle to distribute WiFi from an office PC to a smartphone, the device copes with this task perfectly. It fully justifies its price of 290.

I hope at least someone from the t-link reads here. I'm sorry, but it's really dumb. Something will be changed in the drivers. Why release such a product. We don’t pay fake money, but more and more - nothing to buy, no desire. From cars to such trifles. the, although not a cake, is such a pity for all these imperfections. I read, someone wrote, the Realtek drivers helped in the original. I willcomnduct an experiment. And I'll probably give it back. . Su/? dev=VID_0BDA%26PID_8179 : Earned. As…

For some reason, it constantly causes a system crash and a blue screen on the computer. Most often, the win32kbase and ntkrnlmp. Exe errors appeared in the dump, but there were others. Installing different versions of drivers and BIOS firmware did not help. Reboots stopped after installing an adapter of a different model. Characteristics of the system on which failures occurred: System: windows 10; Processor AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5GHz; Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-A320M-H; Memory module KINGSPEC…

Honestly, I did not expect that such a small adapter can deliver such a speed and at the same time have such stability. Didn't expect it, love it

Now I put it in USB, but nothing happens. There is a device connection sound, but I cannot search for networks. In a word, burned out.

If you use it without high loads - it will fit perfectly. Basically, I have a PC, of ​​course, a cord. For such a cost, a suitable solution if there are no problems with the Wifi signal strength of the point.

Terrible Chinese rubbish. It can be useful only for Internet surfing, and then . If you don’t take nerves on the road, but if you have nowhere to put 500, then you can throw them to the wind.

disappointed on first use. then all of a sudden it started working fine. connects quickly and uninterrupted contact with your smartphone. well earned only a week after the connection. turned out to be a great adapter

Compared with an old netbook, the connection is super. On a new computer with this device, nowhere is worse! Day tormented handed over to the store!

I bought 2 adapters, so far I'm happy For its price the most Some complain that if you set it too far, it doesn't work well. Personally, I didn't notice it.