Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 58
  • 5
    21
  • 4
    16
  • 3
    9
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    9

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Well done, but I won't buy any more.

Chose based on the ratings and comments posted on various websites along with the reputation of the brand. I took it with me thinking it would be useful as a flash drive with a bootable OS, but now I'm not so sure. The write speed on my ancient Transcend J780 16GB flash drive from five years ago is 33Mb/s, and the read speed is 170Mb/s. Because of this, folks who are interested in making the best choice should go with this particular option. I'm not sure if flash drives have started being…

Pros
  • Nice form, however it's made of plastic. Since I have not yet put it to use, all I can offer are hypothetical scenarios and tests.
Cons
  • Due to the weakness of the mechanism that retracts, you will need to hold it while you are inserting it in the port. Strange as it may seem, the results of the test indicate that the sequential write speed on the USB3.0 port is only 15 MB/s, but the read speed is 79 MB/s. This is consistent with the USB2.0 entry, however it is inconsistent with the many reviews that are now available on the market. Amazon will soon offer comparative measurements on its website. Later on, I made some measurements on another Windows 7 computer, and the results were different. The reading speed is now 85 MB/s, while the writing speed is 35 MB/s, which is an improvement. It's likely that system firewood has something to do with this.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

128GB flash drive formatted in NTFS with 16Kb cluster size, speed test results on USB3 port: Synthetic test - 93MB read, 74MB write. With the record, something is clearly not clean, the influence of the cache affects. Real test (24GB file) - 98MB read, 35MB write. Summary - corresponds to the declared characteristics, I recommend.

Pros
  • Speed, price, no cap
Cons
  • Dimensions - could be made shorter and narrower, too wide - for closely spaced USB ports it is problematic to stick something next to the USB flash drive.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

How could such a bad product be made?

Its pros: regular flash drive Time will tell how long it will last Fast enough in USB3.0 ports With its cons: She worked for 3 days and ordered to live long. Apparently got married

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product can be used, I expected a little more.

In the CrystalDiskMark test, the write speed is significantly higher than stated. But live when recording a large file (from 1GB), the speed is lower than stated.

Pros
  • reading speed design latch securely holds the flash drive
Cons
  • Write speed is slower than advertised

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

Well, what can I say. The ratio "Price - Quality" is excellent. The brand holds its own. On average, it holds 30MB for writing, and 100 for reading. The speed is not lost and does not drop.

Pros
  • Bye bye
Cons
  • Didn't watch

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Very high quality product, it's not the first time I bought it.

Has some pros: To be honest, this is most likely the most cost-effective volume option. In theory, the requirements for the flash drive can be met. With these drawbacks: The speed in USB 3.1 does not get above 25 MB, but it's okay, and it's stable, in contrast to Kingston, which dips to 0 MB/s at random intervals. Of course, I anticipated that the speed would be significantly greater.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The purchase was not entirely successful, there were minor problems in use.

Today, I decided to purchase and download the CristalDiskMark utility. The speed of reading is 32 megabytes per second, and the speed of writing ranges from 8 to 18 megabytes per second. I believe that this speed is low and remains unstable since it leaps straight. A movie that is 1.45 gigabytes in size can be copied in a few minutes.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The quality of the product is at the level, I will recommend this product to my friends.

When I need to copy a virtual system that has a 20GB disk from a device that only has USB2, I utilize huge flash drives. The task can be finished in four minutes if it is archived simultaneously with a Rar profile (high-speed archiving, division into 150 MB volumes) and copied to a USB flash drive utilizing Silicon Power. If it is archived simultaneously with Transcend, the process may be finished in six minutes. When connected to a computer with a USB3 port, both flash drives offer the same…

Pros
  • Design and the workings of the mechanisms. It is easier to insert into a USB port than my previous Silicon Power device. The thickness is now 2 millimeters less than it was on my previous Silicon Power.
Cons
  • Because the write speed on both USB3 and USB2 is 1.4 times slower than the write speed on my old Silicon Power Marvel M70 64GB, I've decided to upgrade to the Silicon Power Marvel M70 128GB and give away this one. The body is not very thick. I believe that if I applied a great deal of pressure with my fingertips, I could break it. The length is an additional one centimeter over what was required by Silicon Power.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

(SOLVED!) I spent three hundred and fifty dollars on a JetFlash 790k 8GB (black). Although the recording speed was listed as 6 mb/s on the product's packaging, the actual speed was 12 mb/s, which came as a pleasant surprise to the customer. I was overjoyed with the acquisition until I found out that the flash drive was unreasonably stupid in usb 2.0. When I tried to use it in any of my laptops, the drive was either not identified or an error message displaying either 10 or 43 appeared. On a…

Pros
  • JetFlash 790k 8Gb: -The direct read speed is less than ninety megabytes per second; the recording speed is less than twelve megabytes per second (six was mentioned on the package, therefore I was pleasantly surprised). - Cool design + no cap -Price (350) (they exchanged the broken one for a new one that cost 305 dollars, and then they paid me an additional 45 dollars:))
Cons
  • -(SOLVED) Does not operate in USB 2.0 (in concept, currently there is at least one 3.0 port everywhere, so a doubtful minus); took it to JAST where I got it, and they stated the 2.0 controller fell off; they changed it to the same one, and I also returned 45 due to the difference (the price has decreased!). The latch mechanism is too simple and moves constantly when touched, at least after the SanDisk Extreme USB mechanism, which is apparently on a spring (its mechanism is nice to click back and forth and get high:). Everything is now functioning properly; however, it is large and can prevent something from being plugged into adjacent USB connectors. The latch mechanism is also too simple and moves constantly when touched.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is okay, it's not a waste of money!

I spent five hundred dollars for a 16 GB flash drive that was white in color. I like. I'm not sure about the black one, but the white and blue version has a light bulb that actually illuminates the bottom of the case. I don't know if that happens with the black one. First of all, it is quite bright, and secondly, the plastic is see-through (from the front to about two thirds of the size of the flash drive, and from the back to about one third). My laptop's USB connector is located on the back…

Pros
  • Rapid reproduction. Because I heard that Transcend is a reputable company, I decided to get it. Despite the fact that none of my flash drives have ever been damaged.
Cons
  • In the white-blue variant of the flash drive (in the comments), a glowing light bulb can be found. The flash drive, in its whole, emits a blue glow.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The item is average, not sure if it's worth the money.

According to the reviews that I read, this flash drive has a write speed that is greater than the 45 MB that is declared, and while everything else is exactly as said, the read speed is actually greater than what is declared. The recording of the video clip has some undulations, which suggests that a high-speed buffer was used here, similar to what is found in affordable SSD drives. You can see some screenshots of the recording process below, along with those of an older flash drive that used…

Pros
  • The speed is bearable for 128 GB, considering that it could be lot slower. Excellent writing speed for files less than 10 megabytes.
Cons
  • Fragile case

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not satisfactory, upset with the product.

What type of stuffing was invested in this improvement (silently, of course, as they won't be alerted anywhere about this)? And more generally, how will it work going forward, considering that this is a miracle of Chinese thought.? My memory of Transend as a brand has begun to vanish. There is not and never will be any trust in this relationship. In addition to it, he had dreams concerning the 780th model. kapets. The benefits of it include: The identically named Transcend JetFlash 790 64GB…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, happy with it one hundred percent!

This 63.6 x 21.2 x 10.6 mm flash drive has been in constant usage since November 2022. Bought to replace a slow-writing SanDisk Ultra Dual USB Drive 3.0. It's something you should definitely get, in my opinion. In addition, beginning in August of that year (2022), the price reduced to $1,450. The advantages of this flash drive include its fast read/write times, absence of a cap, and retractable USB connector. No problems have been found after more than 8 months of use.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Lousy product, low quality.

Despite CrystalDiskMark claiming a write speed of 50MB, I have never actually tried to write anything to this flash drive and as a result, there is no such speed. It continuously bounces between 0 and 30, and such waves are constantly recorded. As a result, our maximum average speed while linked to USB 3.0 is 10 megabytes. The speed is slow, there are no advantages, and there is no indicator. various drawbacks: The recording has a low recording speed and jumps frequently; it looks like a…

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Thought it would be better, but overall not bad.

I am confused as to the motivation behind the overwhelmingly positive reception accorded to this brand of flash drives. I tried all three drives, 32, 64, and 128, and I was dissatisfied with all of them. Everyone has the same symptoms, and everyone processes data in the same way. However, whether it comes to dragging movies/anime, music, or other forms of digital rubbish, it still earns a grade of C overall. You might think of it as a repository for many forms of media. I would not put my faith

Pros
  • You have a respectable memory. What other drawbacks does it have, other the fact that it uses MLC memory? This memory has shown itself to be quite stable in comparison to qlc and tlc, therefore this is a plus for it.
Cons
  • To begin, I'd want to comment on the writing speed, which is appalling and unstable. writes a number of little files at a breakneck speed, giving the impression that your graph is a skyline of "Manhattan at sunset." Even with enormous files, the maximum of sixty megabytes that could be extracted did not impress me very much. Memory of the MLC variety The interior of the controller might become very warm. A revolting case that has a stupid retractable mechanism, meaning that it is not firmly fastened in place. In tight couplings, turning it on can be difficult because it has the potential to drive back into the casing. In older versions of the bios, it is not visible for whatever reason, most likely the controller. Not designed to work with LiveCD or Linux that can boot.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Do not hesitate to buy, the quality is amazing for the price.

It has already justified its price many times, I go with it to work as a computer master, all the software that you need is always placed under hand, helps out in any situation, of course, it would be absolutely ideal 256gb for capturing images directly on it with acrobat.

Pros
  • price quality / brand ratio, price tags are equal to no-name flashes on Chinese websites, which work every other time and throw under warranty, and here you can apply for a year under warranty in your city. price tags on Chinese websites are a good indicator of price quality / brand ratio.
Cons
  • Impudence, given the amount of money at stake, to whine about speed, which is not ice.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am very happy with this purchase, I will advise everyone!

Because I didn't want to spend a lot of time moving files from a flash drive to a hard drive and back again, I made sure to bring a flash drive with a fast read/write speed to work with me. The repute of the company, my own prior experience, and the recommendations of my friends all led me to choose this particular model. I am happy with the purchase. Uses their brain. Even though there were no specific complaints, the design feature is a little unsettling.

Pros
  • Reading and writing in a quick and efficient manner. Cost, Detailed Plan
Cons
  • Design

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, glad I found this product.

Real copying, it seems to me, is superior to any artificial tests. NTFS for Windows. The total time required to record a 5.5 GB video onto a USB 2.0 front panel HDD Sata drive is four minutes, with one minute dedicated to copy completion (copy window freezes, flash drive flashes). Exit velocity of 29 MB/sec. The time it takes to transfer a 5.8 GB movie from the same drive to the computer's USB 3.0 port on the back is 2 minutes and 15 seconds. - the final copy is complete. Exit at a rate of 59…

Pros
  • Speed
Cons
  • The corpse dangles.