I bought it to work with desktop PCs, for the convenience of connecting to the Internet, and as an "accelerator" for a laptop: the hardware in the Microstar game almost 8 years ago is still decent, but I would like the Wi-Fi module to be faster, which is at home easily fixable. I am satisfied with the purchase of TP-Link. Has some pros Excellent price / quality ratio, reliable signal reception away from the router, solid, well-thought-out and neat design, 2 antennas with independent angle…

Cool stuff. At work, it was necessary to make an access point in the office and decided to try this model. Connected to a computer (Windows 7), inserted a disk with drivers and that's it! The drivers and the utility for connecting to the network have been installed (In Windows 8 64 bit, the utility is not installed). Then, in the utility, I set the switch to the softAP position (access point), the network settings menu appeared, selected a wired connection, set the network name, entered the…

I solved the problem with the indicator by using a photoresistor, a transistor, and a couple of simple resistors. As a result, the brightness of the indicator now varies depending on the lighting, and when there is no light at all, it functions as an indicator rather than a flashlight. A squeak coming from an extension cord was able to overcome the LC power filter. Indeed, there was unwelcome interference, but the link was already fragile when the door was initially opened. You are free to…

Bought a month ago. Before that there was a zyxel nwd2205. Previously, the speed together with Keenetic Giga was 12-17 Mbps (through 2 walls). After the WN 822N was installed, the speed increased to 35 Mbps stably. Absolutely not bright LED, signal level "with a bang", 1.5 m cord is a useful thing. Communication is not lost, it almost does not heat up (I compare it with NWD 2205). Most pleased with the price. I did not install any drivers, I stuck it in the USB and that's it.

This is not a device that can be connected to a PC and forgotten. We'll have to tinker with the drivers, periodically turn it off and on when it stops working. A year later, I decided to replace it with something better.

Compatible with the TP-Link WR841N router for use in conjunction with it (maximum signal strength is set). The driver for the Realtek RTL8192CU Wireless LAN 8022022n USB 2.0 Network Adapter is version 1027.4.630202222, which was released on March 4, 2022. (the driver was installed automatically without an Internet connection). It was possible to locate the orientation of the adapter and antennae that allows for the highest feasible transfer rate, which was 50 Mbps. The speed did not go above 30

I have a powerful modern router at the front door (I didn’t want to pull the wires, where they punched a hole, they hung it there). There are 3 reinforced concrete walls to the back room, a sliding wardrobe with all kinds of metal fittings and, among other things, a huge number of other intersecting networks. Before my room, a signal of 100 Mbps was absorbed at the output up to 1.2 - 4.5 Mbps. And sometimes even torn. I tried a bunch of whistles of this kind, but only this one saved me. As a…

There was a problem with drivers under Windows 8 (x64). I decided simply, I threw the Internet over the cable, and Windows ate itself found the driver for TP-Link'a. Showed up as Atheros AR7015. Drivers can also be found on the Internet by typing "Atheros AR7015" in the search. Its pros: Work speed. Design. Connection reliability. Adequate price. Everything works great for me. The distance to the router is about 5 meters, through a concrete wall, and I don’t even raise the antennas. The adapter

Became a happy owner of this adapter (ver. 3). After the first hour of use, problems started: under load, the network fell off every minute or two. The speed reaches 6-8 MB / s and . that's it. A yellow triangle on the status of the wi-fi indicator in the tray and without reconnecting in any way. It happened that at 3-4 Mb / s bounced. Having suffered with him for 2-3 hours, I thought it was to carry it back to the store. Fortunately, I found a comment where it was advised to install drivers…

Due to circumstances, I had to look for a WiFi adapter. I chose for a long time, reading the reviews, reviews and performance characteristics of the adapter. I bought this adapter. Installed from the driver's native disk (adapter version 3.0). On 7ku got up like a native. The first two days the connection was interrupted, I realized that neighboring access points interfere with my adapter (the channels are the same). I looked and changed the channel on the router to 11. Recently, there have…

My tariff is 100/100Mbit, the adapter accepts 65/65 through a concrete wall! For example, the wifi network card never gave such results. So definitely a worthwhile thing, I'm very happy!

I bought it so that it would be compatible with desktop PCs, so that it would be convenient to connect to the internet, and so that it could act as a "accelerator" for a laptop. The hardware that was used in the Microstar game almost eight years ago is still decent, but I would like the Wi-Fi module to be faster, which is easily fixable at home. The acquisition of a TP-Link product met all of my expectations. Has some pros Good price to quality ratio, dependable signal reception even when far…

Since I am working on a watch, I decided to get this item in order to boost the signal. And occasionally, in general, because standard laptop ones are often poor, to find its presence (although not the last manufacturer). Since I started using it over three months ago, I haven't had any problems with it. Many advantages: - The overall quality of the cloth is, to my pleasant surprise, not terrible. - The amount of weight. It's convenient that it's just the right size, too (although in…

Pros below: No need to connect manually, when the system starts, it does everything Cons below: Sometimes it falls off. Solving the problem, disconnect and reconnect the power.

The product is a high-quality new chip (version 3), does not heat up under load, for a wireless network in the house, that's what you need. Got pros: Price, speed, ease of use, power and stability of reception and transmission (180-270 mbps) through a load-bearing wall and reinforced concrete floor. With its cons. A useless disk with drivers, for some reason does not work with a branded extension cable (the adapter sees the router, but there is no connection).

I do not advise buying for work with a large amount of Internet resources, games or the like, only for everyday use as an addition, if there are no alternatives

Some pros: Nice little adapter. Long cable. Fast connection, stable signal, speed almost does not cut. Its cons: Didn't reveal, except maybe just one range. But these are my quibbles :).

Among external Wi-Fi receivers, this one is definitely among the best for your money (*if it's not v3) And it worked for a couple of years without problems, but then it started . Unable to withstand the lags, realizing that nothing could be done with firewood, I threw it into a box and bought another one, twice as expensive, but with 5GHz support. There used to be another review here, quite laudatory, but what can you do .) When buying, be sure to look at the hardware version and not take…

The driver downloaded Windows7 \ 64 itself and installed Realtek RTL8192CU, did not install it out of the box due to negative reviews, it works well with this driver. You can take it, or maybe even need it.

Has pros: A powerful signal, price, speed almost does not cut, but this is at 100 mb / s, as it behaves at high speeds, I did not test it. Cons: Needs manual setting. Without it, there will be a small speed and the network will fall off. These settings can only be found by googling.