Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 83
  • 5
    57
  • 4
    15
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    4
  • 1
    2

Type of review

My size is 225/60/18, Honda cr-v 3rd generation. I took rubber, so as not to be afraid sometimes to go to dry soils. In general, I am satisfied - dry gravel, shallow sand, roots - rubber behaves adequately everywhere. Compared to the michelin latitude sport highway, it has become noticeably noisier, in asphalt turns the car starts to swim away to the outer radius earlier, but predictably - without unexpected breakdowns. What floats away is obvious, after all, not a highway. The actual tread…

Pros
  • Soft passage of joints, they confidently drive along dry dirt roads, up to 100 they don’t make much noise. The wheel is not felt.
Cons
  • Curves - when they were balancing, I was already scared, purely visually curves. Although the tire fitter said that this is normal, it's not scary. Like, not a highway. After rolling, a slight beating appeared at 110+, and it is felt in turns. I'm going back for balancing. They feel the change of asphalt - on one they make a lot of noise, on the other they don't make any noise at all. ate after 6 months! Tires are aligned after rolling, see comment. Narrow track contact with coating (180 mm with a tire width of 225 mm!)

Excellent atshka, in my opinion the best of all that I had before. The city / highway runs perfectly, it also takes a country road without problems, you can also roll into a small off-road. At lower temperatures, it does not tan, as is the case with pure summer tires. It turns out universal.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best price for this product, will buy more!

Kyron diesel 2.0, chip. I took to replace the regular Nexen 235/75 r16 for the whole year. Bought 238/85 r16 LT. After regular, tough, after half a year I'm not used to it. Downloading 1.9. It's great in the dry, in the rain too, in the winter I drive on a rear-wheel drive, I'm satisfied, there is only ABS in the car. Over 25,000 km, as if there is no wear. In the mud, xs, but rushing like a tank. In general, very satisfied!

Pros
  • Price, quality, behavior on the road rain/snow/dry.
Cons
  • Rigid (well, this is AT, and even LT)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good quality product, I rate this purchase excellent.

I put on the Grand Cherokee instead of the highway for the summer. It feels like the car has gained 100-200 kilograms in weight. But in general, it rides, rulitsya, does not pop up in puddles. Balanced OK. He moved off the asphalt into the field (for him, in fact, he took it) - he strives to fall into a rut, but having fallen into it, he rows. Rides well and confidently. But you have to be constantly on the alert - the car strives to go into a skid and go sideways (if it hasn't fallen into a…

Pros
  • The car is smoother over bumps. Broken asphalt in the rain - and even better than without rain - goes very gently and never pops up! Smooth asphalt - holds 200 without problems and discomfort.
Cons
  • Noisier than the highway. However, I expected the worst.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not the best quality, but overall not bad.

I'm talking about Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 215/70 R16 100H tires. There is nothing to add yet, but now you can’t get rid of the first impression: the imbalance of the new 2022 Yokohama tires on 3 wheels of 50 grams. - it's och. many at max. allowable 70 gr. The hand of a domestic manufacturer is guessed. But that's how we all work. I recommend tires to people with limited income. In the old Thai yokohama geolandar g012 215/70 r16, the imbalance was only up to 10 g / 1 wheel.

Pros
  • Tread and stiffness at P = 2.4 atm. fits my idea of ​​versatility.
Cons
  • After installing the tires, the imbalance on 3 wheels turned out to be 50 grams each. with an allowable 70 gr.

I put on a ssangyong Kyron 4 * 4 xdi20, previously stood Nokia nordman suv2. 235-75, before them for a short time regular guano nexen rodian 235-75. I switched first to winter 225-75 and then summer to the same size, the choice of rubber 225-75 is much wider than 235-75 Comment after 2-3 months of driving (in the city + to Karelia and back). on asphalt, of course, they are noisy due to the tread being more muddy than highway. very good on the ground, tenacious, on more or less ordinary muddy…

Pros
  • Well balanced, soft feeling, subjectively softer and smoother than Nokia nordman suv2
Cons
  • Haven't found it yet, maybe I'll add something later

Revainrating 2 out of 5

A bad product, not worth the money.

I want to make a reservation right away that we will talk about 2022-made rubber. Why am I clarifying, but there are just a lot of reviews that Thai-made tires are higher and more stable in quality, although company officials deny this. Wheels for the second generation Mitsubishi Pajero Sport were bought to replace the regular Dunlop. Tires bought fresh. They were literally a week old, so it’s not correct to talk about improper storage. The wheels were mounted on new disks and the actual…

Pros
  • Relatively low price. Wear resistant. Not noisy
Cons
  • Manufacturing quality. Quite stiff and not very comfortable.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am completely satisfied, item complies with description.

I bought tires in April 2022 215/65 r16 for 1 wheel I gave 12,000. I drove it from April 28 to October 15 13519 km, of which 6600 km from Hong Kong to Hong Kong when installing rubber, the tread was measured, it was 10.5 and 6 mm to the level of wear. Front wheels residual tread 7.2-7.8 mm and up to wear 3-3.2 mm. The rear wheels here have a better balance of 9-9.3 mm and up to a wear sensor of 5 mm. If your style is more than 70% of the track, I would not take it!

Pros
  • hard sidewall, deep ditches Good handling in slush and loose snow. holds the track and water well on the track Doesn't wiggle. Not noisy
Cons
  • So far, probably one wear.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

Has some pros: Tire Geolandar A / T G015 235/70 R16 106H, it says summer, although there is an all-weather badge. I put this brand for the first time on the UAZ patriot on the recommendation, budget tires. Before that, there were regular Kama wheels. One feels the fit to the road, maybe new ones, hence a certain heaviness of movement at the start. Brakes great. Appearance is pleasant. The remaining parameters are not checked yet. Some cons: The new tires are noisy, at a speed of 90 km / h, I ha

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

Bought in the fall on Tahoe (rear-wheel drive with front connection). Departure more than 25,000, temperature range from -25 to +25, normal flight. It feels good on the track in winter, it rides quite confidently in the snow, naturally it doesn’t really like bare ice (but a thin layer chokes due to weight). Does not roam, you feel quite confident. Definitely satisfied with the purchase. ate: the mileage is already about 140 tkm, the sensations have not changed, I am already rolling the 3rd…

Pros
  • Excellent all-season tire with the makings of off-road
Cons
  • Until I discovered

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Nothing unusual, normal product.

Rubber is weird. She's like an AT, but the pattern is more of a highway pattern. As a result, on the pavement it is very soft (I compare it with the Hankuk Dinapro - in contrast, they are just track ingots), but on the ground they lack a tread. Apparently, its only purpose is a dry hard grader, because on the pavement, during rearrangements, it began to be thrown as if I had two full-size spare wheels on the roof, a garage fire extinguisher on wheels and a spread out tent in which four…

Pros
  • Beautiful Smells good when new
Cons
  • Incomprehensible. More details in the comments.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

I was looking for a budget option to replace the regular Bridgestone Dunlop, which I drove for 4 years, mostly around the city, and passed 100 thousand and was satisfied. I drive these for 5 months, I found autumn and winter in St. Petersburg with snowfalls, there are no problems, they row in the snow, it’s not scary on ice and there are no complaints on asphalt. Over the noise of the diesel, the noise from the tires is not audible. I like.

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • Haven't revealed yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

In March, I bought a full set of tires Yokohama Geolandar G015 A / T 215/65 / made in 2022, though I didn’t immediately understand them, because after changing the shoes there was a rumble, well, I think I got it, the rubber g @ a lot, after a week the rumble began to progress, it became clear that it's not rubber. I drove it into the service, replaced the front right and rear left wheel bearings, and lo and behold, you can’t hear the rubber, from the word at all, neither by 120, nor by 140…

Pros
  • Controllability Quiet wear-resistant
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 2 out of 5

No joy in buying the product, it's not good.

Performance, behavior on the road I liked. But the quality of the rubber itself is just awful . It’s even scary to put it on for the next year. And I bought tires and wheels in a popular hypermarket. And judging by the communication with them, the manufacturer himself does not want to recognize the warranty case. When buying, think carefully, look carefully at the rubber. I say again, maybe I was just unlucky, but I wasn’t the only one who could be in this batch of rubber manufacturing. Maybe…

Pros
  • - not noisy - Drives well - Behavior on the gravel road - Behavior in rainy weather
Cons
  • Rubber quality is terrible. Apparently there was a marriage, of course . I bought a new one, and after 2 months of operation (where 90% is asphalt), the rubber began to crack. The photo does not convey what happened to her. A lot of microcracks + on each wheel there are already an average of 8-10 cracks 1 cm long. I think it might be enough for another season . Who ever bought used tires 10 years ago knows about such cracks.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good product for me, no problems at all.

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 features low wear and good flotation. I drove the car both in the tail and in the mane - both on frankly fig roads and on toll smooth tracks, everywhere the rubber showed itself confidently. I do not regret the purchase, although at first it seemed a little expensive - it's worth the money. So far, the treads are like new, but if anything, I will buy the same tires. I advise you to pay attention to this model to those who care about lateral protection of the tread…

Pros
  • very durable well managed.
Cons
  • No.

Owned the previous model G12. This one is much worse. Despite the not quite asphalt pattern, the cross-country ability is zero! Washes right away and doesn't self-clean! The first rubber with which constant flour with punctures. It pricks everything that can prick! Even branches. There are already 6 SIX patches on one wheel ((the reason, I think, is obvious - this model is made in 2022. It also balances, by the way, disgustingly. I will put goodrich. A miser always pays twice, or even three…

Pros
  • The only plus is the price
Cons
  • Traction, puncture resistance, balance

For those who use a crossover and drive most of the time in the city, go to barbecues in nature or in the country, these tires are suitable, because the sidewall is strengthened and the curbs in the city are not so terrible and on light off-road will help, it is also comfortable on the highway up to 140 km / h to go, for those who mainly dangle Intercity, it is better to look for other wheels

Pros
  • They do not save on light off-road, of course, there are other tires for real off-road. But on the highway up to 140 are quite comfortable in terms of noise
Cons
  • Above 160 it is not comfortable to drive on the highway

I use a month on Pajero 4. I drove 2022 km. I bought it based on reviews, comparing with Nokian Tires Outpost AT. According to general impressions, comparing with the former Bridgestone, Gooder and Michelin, these are the best impressions so far. I managed to visit the flood in Hong Kong and in the pouring rain on the serpentine. I can say that I am pleasantly surprised by the quality of the tires. Hydroplaning up to 80 km / h, almost not felt on a flooded road. If there is more speed or water…

Pros
  • Soft, silent, keeps track, good grip with asphalt during aquaplaning.
Cons
  • Jamming stones in the tread.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend.

I recommend for purchase subject to operation in the SUMMER period when driving 70 percent city, 30 percent light "off-road". Before that, I owned Michelin Latitude Cross for 5 years - very high quality tires, but expensive. Everything is relative, nothing is perfect. I have a 2022 Suzuki Grand Vitara. Hong Konganent four-wheel drive. Tire size 225/65 R17 102H, pressure 2.1bar. Specifications may differ for other parameters! Think for yourself. Enjoy the shopping.

Pros
  • PRICE, soft, good handling on wet and dry roads, small side lugs, fit well on the wheels and balanced, all-weather (for spring thaw, that’s it. When it’s too early to put on summer tires, you drive confidently on this rubber)
Cons
  • Noisy, QUICKLY ERASES due to its softness, mediocre off-road patency (quickly “washes out”), due to the specific tread pattern, the tire is clogged with small objects (pebbles, glass, etc.) and throws them on the go into other cars and objects