🔍 YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 Lens with Auto Focus for Canon EF Mount EOS Cameras and Large Aperture Review

If you look at the price of competitors, then one of the best portraits for amateur or entry-level photographers. The background blurs superbly - although you can find fault with the quality, but you look at its price and forgive him everything. If you need a high-quality portrait lens, then you should buy expensive Canon, Tamron or Sigma It is quite suitable for photographing friends if it is not possible to invest a large amount in photographic equipment. Personally, I went with him for about

I bought this lens as an analogue of the Canon "fifty dollars". I have been using it for several months for portraits, flowers, architecture. It is bright, fast, gives a clear picture and interesting blur . in the case when it focuses. And this is his problem. If the light is slightly worse than sunlight, there are big problems with autofocus, it loses focus, buzzes, drives back and forth. Therefore, it is absolutely not suitable for events and reporting - at the moment when you need to react…

For me, the most appropriate word to characterize this lens is "normal" Of course, work" Of course, it loses to the new native fifty dollars (which is STM) in autofocus, But in comparison with other amateur lenses with a mechanical drive, it focuses tolerably.

I ordered after a long study of reviews and reviews, see any problems with focusing, either in auto (I always focus on the center point), Increasingly, I use the Chinese "fifty dollars"

My authentic product experience.It makes sense to immediately replace the whale with this lens if the whale is ancient, Decent lens for the price.

it is better to buy the original canon, the most expensive is 2500 or buy an old Soviet or foreign analogue 50mm, a manual, it costs up to 5000 the lack of autofocus makes such lenses useless for reportage photography.

Some pros: For such a price, the lens is simply a miracle and not a godsend, I really like the quality of the photograph whether it was taken with this lens. Its cons: The design is plastic, but I think it will withstand temperature changes in winter

The lens left an unpleasant impression. A kind of Chinese imperfection without the ability to finish up to working condition. I admit the likelihood that I came across frankly defective specimens, so I put the lens 3, not 2. I highly recommend not buying THIS via the Internet without touching it, there are a lot of chances that you will throw money away. Some pros: Compared with a direct competitor, only perhaps ergonomics. Has some cons I will not attribute the plasticity of the design to the…

In terms of the combination of the purchase price and the quality of the product, I am rather SATISFIED with the purchase, despite the unexpectedly discovered "peculiarities of use in particular cases." Has some pros PRICE, of course, is the main advantage of this model. Moreover, I bought it for half the price - I paid for the second part with bonus cards, which was given to me, for lack of innocence, by a relative. Aperture - yes, good - but, to get a sharp picture, it is better to cover the…

at night, forget about any other focus other than the center point. Anyone else can't find the focal point. with the Canon 7d, I had to use -7 points autofocus adjustment! front focus. Otherwise, the crop matrix has an excellent portraiture, portraits are about to the waist, not very suitable for full height. Some pros: aperture 1.8, fast autofocus, excellent bokeh, seven-bladed aperture, lightweight, inexpensive. Cons: I shoot on APS-C, autofocus smears, there is no guaranteed result, then it

It makes sense to immediately replace the whale with this lens if the whale is ancient, dusty and loose. Suitable for those who decide to try DSLRs, they took a used carcass for testing and it makes no sense to lay out a double price of this carcass for a new lens. Also suitable for those who want to try fixes. Decent lens for the price. Has some pros Price. For this price: Sharpness, aperture, lightness, size. Has some cons Minimum focusing distance 30+ cm. Something similar to a macro cannot

It must be understood that aperture, cheapness and sharpness cannot occur at the same time. For this price, the lens is excellent, it is incorrect to compare it with Elks or Sigma Art. On the other hand, if you use it as a portrait on a crop (EGF 80mm), you can always say that it does not “soap”, but “soft” :) Autofocus misses, in my opinion, are explained by the same lack of sharpness. Here in the reviews they wrote that the lens is “lost” . I had this, twice. Both times after I forgot to…

I compared it with the Canon 50mm 1.8 STM in Bright, and in the end I took the Canon, despite its cost being more than twice as high. Objectively, in comparison, the Chinese did not like two points: this is sharpness that is much inferior to Canon in open (1.8 and 2.2). I took a photo of distant posters with fonts - the result surprised me, I checked it several times. The second drawback (reminded me of the original fifty dollars of the second series) is lame autofocus. In difficult…

You can put up with the fact that the focus speed is low. You can put up with backlash and cheap plastic You can put up with the noise of the autofocus operation (although the noise is the same as that of the whale 18-55 well, or a little louder - it will do). But you can not put up with a bad picture ! I bought a lens, came home, checked it. It turned out that he misses a lot when using phase detection autofocus. when using contrast, it does not miss, but the sharpness is so-so. returned…

I shoot full frame. It is probably biased to judge this model if I came across a good copy. Before buying, I looked at comparisons with kenon 1.8, test shots, read reviews, but mine actually turned out to be better: a bit to add sharpness to the picture programmatically - an excellent shot, at an open aperture, sharpness, etc., at the level of a closed aperture. I once had a canon 1.4: on apertures up to 2.0 there was soap on light sources, but this one does not have such soap. Autofocus…

For the money, this lens is just perfect. Beautiful bokeh, good sharpness in the open. Many scold, in vain, a very worthy lens, especially for non-professionals who want to try what it is. In the cold, the motor starts to slow down very much, because the lubricant apparently thickens and the focusing speed drops sharply, but this is perhaps the only drawback of this lens

A toy for a teenager or a complete beginner. But in this case, it is better to buy the original canon, the most expensive is 2500r and the reliability is much higher. Well, or buy an old Soviet or foreign analogue 50mm, a manual, but eternal and a nice picture. Well, it costs up to 5000r. True, the lack of autofocus makes such lenses useless for reportage photography.

I bought this lens from OnlineTrade. They didn't publish my review. Their website is a total delight! First of all, I want to note that this is a technically complex product. But they won’t let you test it in the store, but they will persuade you with a smile to take it home and test it there, and if you don’t like it, then return it. But technically complex goods cannot be returned! No matter how much you cry and say later - they say you yourself told me to do so. So. The description says…

For me, the most appropriate word to characterize this lens is "normal". Especially for your money. Of course, it is not suitable for highly artistic works - this requires original lenses and not of this class. But for "operational work" - just right. And if something happens - not so sorry. Of course, it loses to the new native fifty dollars (which is STM) in autofocus, especially in accuracy and especially in backlight and motion shooting. And at such aperture it can be problematic. But in…

So. let's break it all down. Do you have a whale but no bokeh? You must decide what you need this lens for. I call him stupid. well, how do you say? This lens is more for studio shooting. despite the fact that it is fast, it needs a clear pilot light so as not to be stupid. He is slow. it goes the whole distance of the frame. and then like this. wait. let's see again. once again. I summarize. each lens for its own purposes. If you want to save money buy this one. But literally half a year…