Review on Revain by Sergio Daniel Delgado
Revain and a referral system that came at a bad time.
Revain, well, I have been using this platform for about six months and the truth has helped me to a certain extent to venture into what I like, journalism and article editing. Mainly the platform is excellent, The option to express yourself freely about a project as important as Bitcoin and other Blockchain platforms and tools from the same industry is very good for both connoisseurs and those who want to learn about it. The main thing that people who use Revain should know is that what you are going to write is taken into account for new users of the brands you are talking about, maybe with your opinion help a person to use or invest in that project.
My experience with revain has been good, all this apart from growing me as a journalist gives me a remuneration for what I write, this is not something you find on any website. From a couple of months to here, the platform has implemented some changes that, seen from a fair point of view, are very good for the project, since it cleans users who write by writing and not by helping with their opinion. But the quality of the site has also dropped a lot at a certain point
I must tell you that the situation seen for a few months originated from user abuse by referring so many people to the platform, this created a significant number of accounts that they came for a single thing "the payment generated by publishing". I think that the new referral system was excellent but due to the current situation in the world it reached the wrong people. This generated significant changes in Revain, changes that are even bad.
Anyway, I consider the project "Perfect" with certain technical problems possibly caused by the same users, a growth has been noted outside those problems, The REV token has been increasingly reaching more exchanges.
Pros
- I consider Revain as a unique project, full of growth for its users. In my case I can do what I like, it is as if I exercised my passion for journalism.
- One of the most important pros of this platform is its base on the Blockchain platform, since it rewards its authors with a REV token that can then be exchanged for Bitcoin.
- The REV token is slowly coming to more major exchanges.
- The weekly contest generated on Telegram is motivating, in addition to keeping the group active 24 hours.
Cons
- I consider that the attention to its users should improve in a specific aspect. In such case of not accepting some revisions, pay those that are considered of good quality, and not lose 100% of their withdrawals.
- I consider that most reviews by both experts and other members are not from personal experience. I don't think an expert with over 600 reviews has used all of those platforms.
New products
Comments (3)
June 30, 2020
Additionally, I would like to inform you that the number of reviews that you are seeing from the experts, they have been writing for the last 3 years when there was no reward for writing each review.
June 30, 2020
I also believe that having a personal experience with 600+ projects is really difficult. But if we talk about writing high quality reviews, I would say that anyone can write high quality reviews based on proper research, community feedback and their development progress. Because there are some platforms that it is not possible to write a review after using like Lending and Borrowing! Would you like to use this type of platform for writing reviews?
