Review on Zyxel NAS326: Personal Cloud Storage [2-Bay] with Remote Access & Media Streaming – Disks Not Included by Dimitar Kostakev ᠌

If you find any of my writings to be helpful, it will make me happy. Although not everyone requires fine tuning, you will already be prepared for difficulties before making a purchase =. If it were possible to stream content directly from the cloud, then these NAS devices would be almost entirely superfluous. The purchase is one that I do not come to regret. The benefits of it include: I apologize in advance if I sound like I'm rambling. Price is always a factor. There were two compartments for the money, but neither could be located. After using a home network that was only capable of 100 Mbps, a true gigabit can read and write data at speeds of 130-140 Mb/s, which seems like a fairy tale. (I don't know where these numbers come from, because when you divide 1000 Mbit by 8, you get a maximum of 125 megabytes per second; some techies will come up right now). RAM 512MB, Armada 1.3GHz, but other than the web muzzle, I have not seen any brakes so far. I was worried that there would be delays, but only time will tell. DLNA is operational, Twonky has been set up, and mapping folders to locations can be accomplished in any way desired. Having these drawbacks: And it has lost its flavor as a result. In the past, I made use of Freenas on Atom, but I eventually stopped using it because my system did not have enough RAM for ZFS (4 GB) and the motherboard could no longer support it. However, it was possible to configure everything in general, so that made me happy (I am a huge fan of infrared eyes). Because of this, in NAS326, you will not be able to provide access to the same data via CIFS/SMB and NFS at the same time (and separately). This was a frustrating and upsetting discovery for me, and I wanted to send the device back to the manufacturer. In Google, they wrote about hard and sym links from the nfs folder (from where the directories for the NFS server are mounted) to the SMB folders; however, I tried everything and vice versa, and both attempts were unsuccessful due to some kind of stat error when mounting in Linux. Don't ask why I needed SMB with passwords; the data is the same either way! But time is a great healer, and now that I've made it through, I use fierce SMB rather than the racially correct NFS. The second option is called Transmission. Why is the field in this package where you need to specify where to upload the download grayed out and unavailable for use? There are some people who do not wish to go into the admin sphere by default, where they would have to tinker around and copy and paste torrents. According to the old school, in the settings file of the web muzzle located in the settings. Json file, you can only specify where to fill in by default. The other half of them have already been decided. The second half of the problem can be solved by clearing the checkbox labeled "Start download" when adding a torrent and indicating in the "Set location" context menu where the file will be saved after it has been downloaded. Who cares, but it's generally helpful to differentiate between the "strawberry" and children's cartoons =). These are all problems up to this point. On the other hand, it looks like I've reached a point where I'm content with continuing to do the same thing but in a different way. Principles and complexes (.