Review on Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f1.8 (Silver) Lens for Micro 4/3 Cameras - International Version: Enhanced Photography Experience, No Warranty by Agata Kulesza ᠌

Since I initially invested in a micro 4/3 system, I've had the Olympus 45mm f/1.8 in my line of sight for a considerable amount of time. The fact that this glass, despite being one of the more affordable options, is still somewhat pricey was the primary factor that prevented me from making a purchase. Second, there were a sufficient number of reviews on the network that were not entirely complimentary. These reviews stated that there is a significant amount of marriage, and that this results in overshooting autofocus and soapiness. as well as the fact that, in general, the Sigma 30mm f/2.8 Art, which costs half as much, provides the identical picture. Despite the fact that the focal length is different, I decided to go with the Sigma because it was the more affordable option. I cannot say enough excellent things about the lens; however, there were a few spots in the tape where there was insufficient aperture, and I had hoped to include a good portrait lens there. I had a look at the Sigma 60mm lens. But, after weighing all of the benefits and drawbacks, I decided to go with olika. What may be said in the absence of a detailed report on the product's technical specifications? This childlike-appearing camera produces a clear image and gorgeous colors in the pictures when paired with the Olympus OM-D E-M10, which is exactly the case when the resulting jpeg is sufficient on its own. It is sharp, beginning from an open aperture, and has a contrasting pattern. And to process it in its raw state simply leads to spoilage. Although the autofocus of the 45 is marginally superior to that of the Sigma in terms of speed and precision, the percentage of married people is extremely, extremely low. But since not even the smallest things go smoothly, let's sprinkle a little bit of tar on top. This oil is not very good at keeping the backlight, so if you don't have a hood and you're out in the bright sun with your eyes closed, you might get some unwelcome visitors in the form of lights. However, in my opinion, this is a natural reaction of optics. Everything is a lot nicer now that I have a hood (oh, my darling, I had to get one from the Chinese brothers). It is anticipated that everything will be alright even without a hood if the proper posture in the sun is maintained. But when there is not enough light, the topic is shown in all of its splendour; things that were previously blurry and loud are now quite pleasant to look at. In general, a very enjoyable glass, and both as a portrait lens (particularly exquisite) and as a member of staff, it will not go lost. In addition, it is impossible for you to have a neutral attitude toward the outcome of the situation.