Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f1.8 (Silver) Lens for Micro 4/3 Cameras - International Version: Enhanced Photography Experience, No Warranty Review

The lens is excellent, and it has a high aperture. This glass was developed specifically for this matrix, and it produces a picture that has a viewing angle of 90 degrees and a geometry of 90 degrees. This is the equivalent of the 85 mm Canon and Nikon lenses.

Unbiased thoughts on my purchase.Has some pros: Very good picture, compact size, overall good quality. Different cons: Plastic, I would like at least a metal focusing ring,

Surprising, to put it mildly, is the policy of selling this lens in the 2022 in black and white in all languages, the lens hood is indicated, we sell it unstaffed with this very hood

lens. 70% Has the following advantages: (1) It is not difficult to wear a staff member or toss it into a bag. 2 metal fasteners. When shooting portraits at apertures of f/1.8 - f/2.2) - f/4.0, the sharpness is not only in the center of the picture. In combination with the micro stabilizer, the aperture of 4 1.8 enables you to shoot handheld photos in low light conditions or inside without the need for a flash. 4 This lens is substantially slower than the Lumix 20mm f/1.7 rarely misses, but it…

An excellent portrait lens that allows you to get the shot you need, straight arms are always more desirable than curved ones, but with this device, especially after the whale, Example: short Compactness allows you to carry it in your pocket, but it's easy to lose the lid , and it’s dusty in your pockets .

Since I initially invested in a micro 4/3 system, I've had the Olympus 45mm f/1.8 in my line of sight for a considerable amount of time. The fact that this glass, despite being one of the more affordable options, is still somewhat pricey was the primary factor that prevented me from making a purchase. Second, there were a sufficient number of reviews on the network that were not entirely complimentary. These reviews stated that there is a significant amount of marriage, and that this results in

Some pros: Sharp, bright, beautiful bokeh, there are practically no geometric distortions, well assembled, inexpensive. The portraits are amazing. With its cons. No. I immediately bought a tifen UV filter for the filter, but as it turned out, it just gave crazy glare. So be careful when buying a filter to the lens.

Excellent glass. You are going to be quite impressed by the quality of the photographs that you take after filming on whale glass. Light—with an aperture of 1.8, you can take pictures almost entirely in the dark and still get fantastic results. In terms of focal length, a typical portrait will have an actual FR value of 90 millimeters when shot with a Micro 4/3 camera. It is impossible to say that it applies to everyone because you are constantly rushing to ensure that everything you require is

Fine glass. After filming on whale glass, you will be very surprised at the quality of the photos. Light - aperture 1.8 allows you to shoot almost at night and get great shots. In terms of focal length - a typical portrait, on the Micro 4/3 system its real FR = 90 mm. It is difficult to call it universal - you are tormented by running so that everything you need gets into the frame. For a system with a matrix crop factor of 2, it is more logical to take as a universal fix with a FR of 17-25 mm.

for those who are used to heavy cameras and lenses, this model will seem like a toy. but this toy has huge potential. for me, weight in this case is a huge plus, since I usually have a few more film cameras with me, and every extra gram at the end of the day seems like a kilogram dumbbell around my neck . Pros below: excellent portrait lens, very compact, easy to use. Works great both in the studio and outdoors. Cons below: Of course, it is not for rainy weather, this must be understood. and…

It is one of the best micro 4 3 lenses. Usually lenses with EGF 85 are good and very good. This one is very good in drawing and good in sharpness and work against light. As a sharp telephoto, it is better to pay attention to sigma 60 2.8. This one took root exclusively as a lens for portraits. Pros below: Light and small: fits into your pocket when another fix is ​​on the camera. Looks good on any micro 4 3 cameras. Sharp (but not the standard of sharpness). It is difficult to talk about the…

An excellent lens for the money, analogues are not as much better as they are more expensive. I also shot the Pro version of 45ki, so on an open 1.2 the difference in sharpness is so minimal from 1.8 of this glass that it is distinguishable only with a paired comparison)). Whether it is worth overpaying already, let everyone decide for himself. Has pros: Size/weight . Relative sharpness with open. Peak sharpness 2.8-4 . It also looks good in black.) Price compared to competitors. Pleasing to…

As a portrait lens, unexpectedly good, criticism mainly concerns the configuration. From what was expected: it is desirable to work on a fully open hole - after all, the M4 / 3 system with background blur is inferior to APS-C systems and even more so to FF, and comparable to portrait lenses from SLRs, Olympus ED 75mm f / 1.8, costs immeasurably. Compared in manual focus mode (I have an E-M10) through adapters with lenses: Helios 81N, Kaleinar 5N, Helios 44-3. The Olympus M. Zuiko Digital 45mm…

In general, I am very satisfied, despite the existing "shortcomings" I recommend to buy. Got pros: An excellent lens for the money, probably the best lens to buy first of the fixes for olympus cameras, in terms of price. Of course, this is not quite a budget, since aperture is 1.8, but not the initial lens either. I can advise those who (like me) are exhausted as a photographer on whale lenses with low aperture. Looks very stylish. Has some cons On a completely open aperture, chromatic…

NOT a drawback - the bayonet mount is tight, yes - at first it’s scary, you think how not to roll something, then it sits down easier (from the 10th time) Some pros: First impressions: With an external flash, this lens is a bomb, in portraits you can look at the pores on the face. Soft stroke of the focus ring. The quality of the materials (the body is light plastic) and the assembly are excellent (I have Vietnam, judging by the inscriptions) - there is no backlash, the covers / plugs do not…

Attached are sample photos. I've been shooting with it for quite some time now. In general, the lens is very tightly "knocked down" in its qualities. And all for a very reasonable price. In fact, this lens is currently the lightest and most compact portrait lens on the market with good image quality. But my work with him is not limited to portraits, he is quite suitable for the street, as well as urban landscapes. Blurring is very pleasant, bokeh nervousness is sometimes found only in…

The lens is very good, high aperture, plus portrait focal length. Do not compare with fifty dollars from other companies in terms of cost. This glass is designed specifically for this matrix, and gives a picture in terms of viewing angle and geometry as 90 mm in full frame. Therefore, this is an analogue of 85 mm Canon and Nikon, including the price. Although it is unrealistic to compare them with each other in my opinion.

I am not quite a beginner in photography, but, objectively, so far I only claim to be an amateur level with some artistic bias. Having run off for six months with a whale 14-42 II R, after reading articles, watching videos and listening to photographers of various levels, I firmly convinced myself that I needed to fork out for a "fast fix", otherwise "masterpieces" would not shine for me. The choice fell on 45 1.8 for two reasons: Firstly, because of the general admiration for him - he is…

Have you noticed that compactness is both an advantage and a disadvantage? Because it all depends on who will use and on what. On Pens and my M10II, it is perfectly balanced with the carcass, if suspended on a standard belt, it does not outweigh anywhere. On M1 it will look funny and the carcass will outweigh back. In the hand it feels more expensive than it actually is, despite the fact that the plastic is very pleasant to the touch. For example, the same Panas 14-45 is unpleasant to pick up…

I am not a professional. If they were, I would buy a SLR. But I didn’t buy a DSLR because I’m not a professional and I was satisfied with the pictures and, most importantly, the VIDEO from my camera. Then, back in 2022, it was a good device. Arranged in 70% of cases and a regular lens 14-140 (1: 4-5.8). Now I want a DSLR, but switching to another system is a little expensive. I decided to calm down for a year or two, and now to please the carcass with something. Bought an Olympus 45mm f/1.8…