Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 35
  • 5
    27
  • 4
    6
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It was a reasonable purchase, I will order more.

Its pros: The most balanced of the critters Brutal and decent performance Respectful appearance Good quality in the mud on a blunt american type machine Cons: noisy heavy An egg can become 80,000 km away - when punctured, the inner cord breaks from chemicals . The wheel is lost

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

To make the review more or less objective, my car is a Toyota land cruiser Prado 150 4.0, it has its own characteristics of behavior on the road - a frame, a rear axle, a high center of gravity (in general, it does not have a sharp and fast ride). And as a result, I am 100% satisfied with the tires and definitely recommend to buy Has some pros: It rows perfectly in the mud (not clay, nothing rides here at all), goes gently on bad asphalt (including the city), does not make noise (perhaps it…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

I bought this rubber back in the winter for the summer, for the Ministry of Railways, there was no experience in using such rubber, before that I used Nokia Rotiva in the summer. In March, with the snow melting, the asphalt and the studded seventh Nokia became a pity to kill in the pits, so I put BF, it is imprisoned for such roads. The very first impression was that he didn’t take off winter tires, the comfort is absolutely the same, and the summer one is much tougher than the winter one…

Pros
  • Very interesting tread pattern, strong sidewall.
Cons
  • difficult balancing loads from 70gr. up to 270 gr. on the wheel

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Terrible product, not worth your money absolutely!

Long thought what to take. Decided to buy BF G A/T KO2. Drive in the field on a dry road - yes (the tread allows), Driving through flooded areas, mud, clay - no! (It lathers right away, you have to go out, lower the wheels so that you can row at least somehow, go out into a puddle and mud and poke around is not a very pleasant experience when you are already stuck .); Driving around the city is not. (not highway, when the winter period approaches, it becomes dubious and controllability is…

Cons
  • The price, lathers immediately in clay, is poorly balanced.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

Purchased in 2022 Pajero 3 car. There used to be summer and winter. These tires can really be used as all season tires! The snowflake index must be on the tires. Now I don’t change shoes (3 seasons), only once I threw the back with the front. All. I can't say anything bad. In winter, they behave confidently, just as well as the former Dunlop studs. In the summer, a small rumble appears on certain sections of the track, BUT we make a discount - the rubber has a very brutal tread, and secondly…

Pros
  • Year-round use without consequences (of course, with a head). Wear resistance. Strong. Rubber quality. Well, the look.
Cons
  • Still managed to pierce) some powerful needle got caught, put a patch, everything is ok.

Excellent tires for lovers of fishing and hunting, and in the city they are not afraid of careless driving (curbs, torn asphalt, pits, sharp edges) Its pros: BF Goodrich All Terrain KO2 Reliable! Very strong sidewall Great lateral support Holds the road well at speed (tested at 150) Easy off-road, soggy black soil without slips and slips, like on rails Removes dirt quickly Pebbles don't get stuck, no clatter Looks great with side lugs Some cons: Noise! At first, in the first tens of kilometers,

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

Got pros: Good on rocks, off-road. According to mesevu, too, very personal. Cons below: The main thing is not to drive on ice under any circumstances. a little touched steering - you're in a ditch upside down. Real story.

The tires were used on a UAZ hunter. This vehicle requires a light rear suspension lift. Size 235*85*R16. Tires showed their best side. They slip in winter. Perhaps the most optimal for non-extreme conditions. Has some pros: Tires are available in various sizes. The quality is excellent. Well balanced. They can be confidently used on all types of roads, in ruts. Good handling. Great resource - more than 150 thousand km. Got cons: High price. Great weight, which leads to an increase in fuel…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, one of the best offers.

I use BFG AT in size 265/70R17 as a summer one, after wearing out the stock Geolander G902. Before buying, there were concerns about its noise - there is experience in operating the BFG MT KM2. But the rubber was a pleasant surprise, it turned out to be quieter than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 5. It was well balanced, a maximum of 30 g. In clay, of course, the matter is washed out, but for these cases there is a MT. Happy with the choice. Consumption +1…1.5 l for P-IV 3.0. 2022: mileage around…

Pros
  • Off-road qualities. Wear resistance. Low noise for AT rubber
Cons
  • Weight - yes, 32 kg. Does not work on ice and snow, but this is not a drawback. Do not flatter yourself - this is not all-weather tires!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

Bought at the end of September, before 3 years departure year-round on the previous generation. Compared to the previous version, the behavior in winter has noticeably improved, although it is still too early to draw an unambiguous conclusion, because. there were no real frosts when rubber can tan. In medium-heavy mud, it rides no worse than the previous generation. On clay, where the previous version had problems with fast blurring, it was not particularly possible to try this fall. If you do

Pros
  • Better than predecessor behaves in winter
Cons
  • The protector looks worse in the photo than it really is.

Took as a summer on TLK200, departed the season. It was originally planned as a city + field trips, but nature did not work out and exploited on asphalt. Therefore, my impressions are more addressed to those who plan to drive it around the city. In short - the rubber is very specific, I still did not understand all the enthusiasm about it in the reviews. It was created for operation in very difficult conditions, for driving on sharp stones in the arid regions of Australia and the USA, it did…

Pros
  • - soft rubber, low noise - comfortable at low speeds - not sensitive to rutting - powerful rubber with a thick sidewall, high durability - despite the low noise, a rather aggressive tread - the car looks evil on it - balanced without problems
Cons
  • - on dry pavement it clings to the road very weakly, even worse than winter spikes - very heavy tires, about 2 liters per hundred plus consumption - due to the weight of the tires, comfort at high speeds suffers, especially when driving over bumps (because the unsprung mass increases greatly) - the price is significantly higher than analogues

One of the best representatives of a / t rubber, if not for the weight, I would call it the best. Because of this shortcoming, + 1l to fuel consumption and a noticeable drop in dynamics during acceleration (I have a Pajero Sport 2.4D). Noise is present only in the range of movement between 80-90 km / h, otherwise silence. Very soft rubber, road joints can only be heard, without shaking the car.

Pros
  • Tread pattern, versatile road performance
Cons
  • Weight!

As for the use in winter: yes, it rides well in the snow, all the same there is a tread. But! It’s not suitable for ice at all, the rubber is essentially summer, and in winter it becomes stone, plus it’s natural without spikes, so don’t even think about it. Yes, you can ride it in the city in the cold (everything is flooded with reagents), but is there a need for it? There is no need for it in the winter in the city. Do not spoil the rubber and your nerves.

Pros
  • Excellent road holding on gravel, sand. According to the grader, at 90-100 km / h, it enters sharp turns well, of course it skids a little, but keeps everything under control. Well suited for off-road, without fanaticism of course. Departure on one set of about 100,000 km.
Cons
  • There is only one drawback - when they start using it as an all-weather one. It is summer + off-season.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

The best balance of all characteristics. Ideal for SUVs with all-wheel drive. I drove 100,000 km on it in 4 years across the country practically in winter and summer on various surfaces. I will only pay attention to careful driving on bare ice, especially wet, no tricky drives will even help to move off, you have to set sail :-). The strength and thickness of the tread allows you to ride on self-tapping screws. For AT class rubber, the characteristics are even very good. Good luck to all!

Pros
  • Truly all-weather, strength, wear resistance, low noise, controllability, reliability, throughput, versatility for any surface
Cons
  • Weight, price, increase in fuel consumption