Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 115
  • 5
    86
  • 4
    20
  • 3
    7
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

As a comment, I note that the "six" is a camera for a very leisurely thoughtful shooting, with an appropriate AF system. This is never a reporter, and for filming something moving faster than a snail, it is poorly adapted. On the same L-USM optics 24-105, 17-40, 70-200, even with prefocusing, the camera had a lag greater than 50D, which was the cause of disappointment and subsequent separation. The camera focuses even in low light conditions accurately, but slowly with a noticeable subsequent…

Pros
  • written without me a lot +. join silently. I agree.
Cons
  • AF

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality exceeds all expectations, I recommend to buy.

If I have to choose between canon 5D mark 2 , canon 6D and Canon 5D mark 3 , I will choose 6D ! I consider it inappropriate to take Mark 3, the price is too high) and the bells and whistles are basically unnecessary) Mark 2 is outdated, I wanted to take it at first, but after paying a little extra I got an excellent smart camera, with all the bells and whistles that a professional photographer needs!

Pros
  • Excellent camera, completely satisfied) pleasant noises even at high Iso) perfectly shoots both video and photos) Very pleased with the full frame! and wi-fi is very convenient! I transfer pictures without taking the camera out of the bag)
Cons
  • GPS is not needed at all in my opinion)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, glad I found this product.

I debated between the 5DM2 and the 6D for a very long time before settling on the 6D. In the past, there was simply a crop (Canon, Nikon) - there is no DD on the crops of the Canon, nothing stretches, and while the Nikon appears to be better, there is even more noise with it. The DD is far larger here, which can be observed very easily. You are able to remove the photo. ISO is fantastic, with absolutely no noise at all! The battery typically maintains its charge, and I would even argue that it…

Pros
  • f-stop, ISO, grip, power source, and cost
Cons
  • Uhm . nuuuuh . unless it fries potatoes:)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

I bought a whale (from 24-105), but I will write a review about the bodysuit. Actually, the camera has a lot of pluses (they have already been told about, I see no reason to repeat) and minuses, but I want to mention one unpleasant moment that no one has written yet, but which has been going on since early models (like 5D). It consists in the fact that during continuous shooting, the focusing screen literally falls out of the device (such a matte glass inside the carcass) - nothing becomes…

Pros
  • all of the above and below
Cons
  • all of the above and below

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

In my opinion, Wi-Fi and GPS are unnecessary. If I could get by without these features, the price tag would be much more reasonable. I tried Fi-Wi and while it's interesting, it's not something I need, and it drains my battery really quickly. In most cases, this f/a model is an excellent career choice. Protection from dust and moisture, reserved for the finest models; additional funding is available. This f/a comes with my highest endorsement. When shooting in RAW, the switch from crop mode…

Pros
  • Full frame, which means less noise compared to crop, a greater sensitivity, a broader dynamic range, accurate focusing (I work only on the center point), and the capacity to photograph in very tough settings with low light. A powerful computer with a quick algorithm for handling image processing. The lowest levels of noise and most accurate color reproduction of the 10D, 30D, 40D, 50D, and 70D I tested. in addition to increased commotion and higher hard disk charges (I maintain a sizable archive). As I mostly now photograph with flash, I no longer require rapid fire. The main benefit of this f/a is a high-quality picture; upgrading from a Canon 50D will result in a noticeable improvement. Tough as nails battery. I think it should be manageable given the limited number of focal points; again, I just deal with the central one. I currently own a 6D, 70D, and 5D Mark III, and I can say that the image quality is not worse than that of the third brand. A great f/a to have if you're not concerned about your professional status. Having a shutter with a very slow response time is beneficial since it reduces camera shake. The difference between 1/180 and 1/200 on brand 3 is purely arbitrary; the image is formed at the moment the flash is fired, and the speed at which it operates is much faster; and the difference is neither large nor fundamental; it is, rather, a marketing ploy designed to limit the camera's potential in comparison to the 3 mark.
Cons
  • Shutter only lasted 97 thousand frames before breaking. When using a flash, the metering is poorer than on brand 3, the inaccuracy is greater, and it is less convenient to make corrections than on the 50D or 5D Mark III. Although I find its portability and compact size to be a drawback, others may find these to be advantages.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

In the summer, someone stole my 60D, so I've been debating whether or not to replace it with an inexpensive full-frame camera. I checked the market prices, which start at 72, but they are for Indian-staffed or previously-owned workplaces (judging by the reviews of these stores on the same market). Nonetheless, one shop's sale dropped much below average (from 102 to 78). What should you do? Take it, because even when Mark II is released, it won't be much cheaper. Therefore, I took it in hand…

Pros
  • Light sensitivity, sensitivity to motion in dark, and full frame
Cons
  • You have your independence back, daughter. I made a purchase, and now I have to buy a whole new wardrobe to go with it. The same holds true here; I recently purchased a camera, but I still need new glasses and a few other things.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The price/quality ratio is great, I will buy again.

Pros: Lightweight, compact, large ISO, The presence of wi fi (I work in the studio, so it's important) In general, I'm satisfied! Has cons: There is no built-in flash, although not critical, there are no buttons to the left of the screen like 5.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, its nice to use.

The transition from the EOS 60D is painless, almost all the main functions are in place, the transition from photo mode to video mode has become more convenient. Much has already been written about its positive qualities. So I see no point in repeating myself. One thing I can say for sure: it allows you to do what was not available on the crop due to technical features. And given the difference in price compared to the 5D Mark3, this is a plus for a good lens for the carcass. So, there is…

Pros
  • FF, Wi-Fi, GPS, internal lens adjustment, price
Cons
  • not significant

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

Decided to write a review as it seems to be still in production. It's a great hobbyist camera because it has a full frame so all lenses work as intended. Unless the TVs on the crop get an advantage. This camera suits me perfectly in terms of ergonomics. Before that, there was the first 5D and it was inconvenient for him to use the joystick, especially when his hands were wet. Here it is not a joystick, but 4 buttons inside the ring - very convenient. I also liked that the top buttons have one

Pros
  • Good image quality (even slightly better than 5DMarkIII in tests, if you look closely). Light weight, price.
Cons
  • Not very nice plastic on the rear wheel compared to 5D and 7D.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is completely satisfied, performs its functions.

First of all, you need to understand that I try, as far as possible, to indicate the disadvantages and advantages not in comparison with younger or older models. After all, if we take, for example, the initial camera, then in the disadvantages column, you can safely write several paragraphs of text simply listing the functions of the flagship cameras. It is the same with the advantages of the top of the line compared to amateur devices. So, more to the point. BB indoors in half the cases lies…

Pros
  • Low noise at high ISO
Cons
  • BB not working correctly. No BB button. Not grippy. High price.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Ive never seen anything worse! A terrible purchase.

the choice was between a nickel the second and 6d, the first option immediately disappeared for him for 5 years, then he looked closely at the d600 from NIKON, the d600 iso is weaker and 6d is almost like 5d mark 3, and mark 3 has no wi-fi and GPS hello to him, I don’t see the point in taking 5d mark 3. it’s better to take 6d and another lens L-ku will be more reasonable, the buttons were removed from the left side of the screen, now you mainly work with your right hand, probably 6d mark 2…

Pros
  • autofocus, working iso. ergonomics, on the hand lies like a glove, but resembles 60d. wi-fi I think is a very big plus, well, GPS, auto focus adjustment, 20mp instead of 22 less noise, it pleases
Cons
  • chose a low rating for everyone to read, There is only one CD card, not safe for serious shooting, the joystick inside the scroll wheel, like on 60d, is not very convenient, you need to be careful on 5d mark 2 and mark 3 it is more convenient, there is no white balance department on the monochrome screen (well, this is a semi-wire camera)

ated my first 5D to 6D. Bought today. I use the new camera for 30 minutes. Autofocus has certainly improved, the advantages compared to the first nickel are written above. Bought along with 16-35L. It's worth it! Has pros: Since I am a user of the very first "penny", I compare it with it: - quiet shutter; - 20MP (+8 MP); - video! (not tested yet); - matrix cleaning; - working high ISO Has some cons - white balance is changed through the menu (I need to search more, but this is the first…

A cut down version of a great camera. They cut everything subtly, barely noticeable, but in my work I felt these limitations. People! There are three camera versions! With Wi-Fi and GS (ver. WG), only with a jeep, and without both! Camera versions: "Canon WG/G/N" I need Wi-Fi for the studio, so that I don’t pull the flash drive endlessly. I really missed GPS on interesting trips, but here it is. ISO 6400 keeps excellent! Focuses great too! A wide range of video formats, but you can't shoot…

Pros
  • - Low noise at ISO 6400. - Full frame. - WiFi, GPS. - A display that shows the sharpness of the image immediately. - Settings for the ISO range used (handy thing). - Shooting video. - Connector for an external microphone. - It seems like there is a moisture-dust protection. - I also liked the electronic level of camera tilt detection. - Lack of built-in flash (it always bothers me only). (the rest has already been said by others)
Cons
  • - ! Attention! There are three camera versions! (WG, G, N) Pay attention when buying, otherwise buy without Wi-Fi or without GPS! - Ergonomics seems to be worsened on purpose! - does not shoot in RAW in automatic modes. - The fastest shutter speed is 1\4000. Push to use ND filter. (If you use bright lenses, then buy Mark3! Sad .) - In video mode, I can not set shooting with aperture priority. Automatically selects itself. In fully manual mode, you can already specify the aperture. - Auto white balance is lame, and there is no quick access button to the balance at the top. Only through the menu.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

For a long time I shot on crop, I started with 1100 d, then 550 d, then 60 d, 70 d, 7 d. It so happened that one camera was mine, the other at the institute, the third in the editorial office, where I worked as a correspondent. And there were crops everywhere. And so I decided to take a camera for weddings better than 60 d, with which I worked at that time. In a crisis, the choice, of course, was limited only to models up to 100 thousand, and this is 7d mark 2 and 6d. After a long reading on…

Pros
  • The model is excellent, but not for serious work. If for the studio, then that's it.
Cons
  • 1. Low continuous shooting, with the same 60 d or 70 d it was more convenient to catch different moments, it seemed 4 against 6, and not a fig. It is clear that a fast shooting speed is needed at a wedding no more than 3-5 times, but you need it. 2. Autofocus. Having got used to the fact that at 70 d, that at 7 d all points hit the target equally well, here you have to limit yourself to the central one, that is, crop after focusing on autofocus . It's a matter of habit, but before looking at the situation, I immediately knew how I wanted take a picture and even before bringing the fotik, I chose a point in the place I needed. 3. 1 memory card slot.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product, not disappointed.

I frankly did not like the device as having both mark 3 and 6D. It was bought as a compromise, in that period of time when I had to part with the first Mark 3, and then there was simply not enough money for a new one and I urgently needed a camera. I fell for banal marketing, which I later regretted. And after all, the money was not great in fact, it means the difference between 6D and mark 3. I would take it and buy it. But no. A miser pays twice - I checked this proverb again on myself. In…

Pros
  • Of the real advantages, it has only a full frame and the advantages arising from this fact, such as a low-noise matrix and a higher working ISO compared to the MK2, and as a result, the output picture is good. Perhaps the weight is slightly lighter than that of the same both brands.
Cons
  • But there are more disadvantages than advantages. I’ll say the main one - autofocus is perhaps much worse than on brand 2, I’m generally silent about 3. Capturing dynamics is difficult. But of course, you can, they shot on stamp 2 and it happened on younger kenons - and nothing terrible happened, except for frequent shots and missed moments.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Thinking about buying, compared 5d mark2, 6D, 5d mark3. 5d mark2 - disappeared almost immediately, due to known shortcomings, poor focusing in low light and poor focusing at open aperture values, and besides, it has been on the market for the fifth year, it is simply morally and technically outdated, and video recording is only 30 frames / s - jumps appear when slowing down. Mark 3 was dropped because it's expensive, and besides, I don't need such a rate of fire. As a result, I settled on 6D…

Pros
  • Full frame, powerful battery, high working ISO. Excellent video - 60 fps and FullHD.
Cons
  • Lack of a second slot for a memory card.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

An excellent device with excellent picture quality, put the appropriate optics (for the price, I mean in terms of quality) and enjoy. For those who switch from crop, I recommend it, it allows you to evaluate all the advantages of FF. I will say this - the difference is really big. It is felt immediately, the same optics shows itself from the other side. By the way, I didn’t get rid of the 60D, but sometimes it will be in demand. Prices for it, of course, have increased significantly, it costs

Pros
  • I switched from crop - and FF is clearly +, first of all, a large bright viewfinder, I mean the first thing you notice. Both color reproduction and dynamic range are better, noise is an order of magnitude smaller. It's understandable. 20 MP - I think is optimal for myself. WIFI is a useful thing, I like to upload the footage to the iPad. But the battery drains very quickly. By the way, the battery itself, which is the same on the 60D, pleased me - it holds 1000 frames. The shutter, as for me, sounds just great, I would like to note separately the quiet mode - it's gorgeous.
Cons
  • There is, of course, despite the fact that, in principle, the camera's professional ergonomics have deteriorated relative to the same 5. I don't consider it critical. Focusing - 11 points. In general, everyone wrote - you know. She's not bad. Works fast with no issues. But not for moving objects (I mean fast moving ones). There will be many marriages. Yes, there is a new way of zooming when viewing, yes there is a plastic screen, yes there is not a completely magnesium body, and there is a lot more that can be pulled by the ears. But it's all rather nit-picking. If you want better - wait 5m4. Here. But you have to pay for it if you need it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best price for this product, will buy more!

Great price not only for equipment, but also for additional accessories and the necessary accompanying equipment. With pleasure, I purchased a canon 6d body + 24-105mm + 50mm 1/4 and two filters on the site. At self-pickup, I bought another extra battery + bag, convenient and fast. I would like to note the work of the employees of the point, they did not delay, they tried to help and explain everything.

Pros
  • Convenient pickup point, you can buy accessories on the spot, very close to the metro.

Bought to replace 600D. Some demand professional features from this camera 2 memory slots, histogram in the viewfinder, two processors, etc. This is an amateur camera, there are 1d and 5d for professional use. Price cut by $1,000. In addition to the FF matrix, the main expenses in the cameras are borne by the AF and the operation of the mirror at short shutter speeds. In addition, it is dust and moisture resistant. All this costs money. The most important thing in the camera is an…

Pros
  • Build quality, AF adjustment
Cons
  • missing 1/8000, a vacuum cleaner the rest is unimportant for the amateur

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

I use this camera as my main camera for cycling trips, I visited Iceland with it in the summer under heavy rains. The camera lives up to my expectations, although there is still room for improvement. Auto-ISO with indication in the viewfinder, improved interface, more convenient and logical control, a lot of settings - all this greatly simplifies working with the camera in reportage mode. Low noise is pleasing - here ISO 25600 can be used quite freely if noise suppression is taken care of…

Pros
  • Full frame (with all the ensuing pluses) for a reasonable price, excellent autofocus performance in the dark, the camera is quite compact and light, low image noise, quiet shutter operation, high ease of use compared to old cameras, moisture protection.
Cons
  • Minor flaws in the interface and controls, too large RAW files with a small increase in quality, poor-quality mRAW format.