- Low noise even when using a high ISO. Autofocus (central point) (center point) Ergonomics (many improvements) (several improvements)
- They "sawed" a more advanced AF system into the camera when they had the opportunity to do so.
- Full frame! The matrix is just gorgeous, there is almost no noise!
- Ergonomics, all known nitpicks when compared with 5d3
- ISO, ergonomics, video 50 fps, processor, microphone (!). I shoot only video on it, I can’t say anything about the photo,
- Strong moire. Soap when shooting 720p. Moisture resistance - three, it is better not to fall into the rain. Bad screen (its characteristics and lack of auto-brightness adjustment).
- Ergonomics ensure that the majority of the controls, such as buttons and wheels, are positioned on one side, making it easy to approach them. In my hand, the texture is just right; it's really gripping. Wi-Fi and GPS are available, which is a plus given the dim lighting. Full frame, without a doubt! The shutter sound is nothing more than music (although this is a matter of opinion), and if you set the camera to S mode, it becomes nearly inaudible. The sensitivity of the central autofocus sensor goes all the way down to -3EV. The battery is built to last for a long time. Choose between LV and Video mode. The quality of camera JPEG is excellent. Although HDR mode and multi-frame noise reduction are useful, JPEG is the sole format that supports them.
- The marketing industry is both meaningless and cruel. Is that how much it will set you back to leave additional functionality for the buttons that are located close to the top display? And the information about the selected quality and white balance should be left on the display itself, right? However, rather than being a drawback, the characteristic "oakiness" of Canon matrices is considered a desirable quality.
- Full frame, DD, light sensitivity
- You feel like your own girl. I bought a piece - I need a bunch more clothes for this piece. It's the same here: I bought a camera, now I still want a couple of glasses, and something else :)
- Full frame, low noise, Wi-Fi, GPS. Sturdy body with a good grip, not too heavy, comfortable controls for the right hand. Great shutter sound. Silent shutter mode to avoid drawing attention.
- Not detected.
- Ergonomics - most of the buttons and wheels are located on one side and it is convenient to get close to them. Very grippy - in my hand - ideal. There is Wi-Fi and GPS, Very good for poor lighting. Full frame of course! The shutter sound is just music (albeit subjectively), if you set the S mode, then it is almost inaudible. The central autofocus sensor is sensitive down to -3EV. The battery is very durable. LV/Video mode switch. Camera JPEG is very, very good. HDR-mode and multi-frame noise reduction are effective but only work in JPEG.
- Marketing is pointless and merciless. That's what it cost to leave additional functions for the buttons near the top display? And in the display itself, leave information about the selected quality and white balance? Well, the general "oakiness" of Canon matrices is no longer a disadvantage, but a feature.
- functioning at high ISO values; superb autofocus, and even in conditions with relatively little available light.
- The LCD is highly susceptible to getting dirty, and the button for previewing depth of field is located in the most inconvenient possible spot.
- Economical battery consumption, ISSO,
- I work as a photographer with this device. Dust and moisture protection, excellent focusing on the central point, low noise at high ISO (the matrix is similar to 5d mark 3). The price is almost like a crop, while the full frame adds 1.5 times more light relative to the crop, (can be set lower ISO) reduces the depth of field (good for bokeh), because. the aperture becomes 1.5 times wider and makes the viewing angles wider with the same lens FR, which allows you to fully use 14-18mm wide-angle lenses. The best fleet of optics in terms of price, quality and availability in the 2022 is with full-frame Canon.
- The focusing system lags far behind professional and expensive Nikon Canon Sony devices. In reality, I almost always use only the center point. If I shoot portraits with a shallow depth of field at apertures below f2.8, I need to use other focus points, but they work very poorly, they are only suitable for a bright room and when there is time to shoot a person for a long time. Poor rate of fire and poor focus make it not the best choice for sports photography, but I have photographed motorcyclists and other sports, clients are satisfied, you just need to learn how to photograph sports.
- - All previously written. current price (but still expensive) - continuous shooting corresponds to the declared one, when using cards of at least 10 class - there is an autofocus adjustment for each lens. - ergonomics and lightness (relatively), I personally like it. - autofocus is smart both during the day and at night) but not always accurate. - RAV editing right in the camera, but the feature set is dull. - high working ISO, no matter how trite)) up to 12800 (but it all depends on the noise reduction mode)
- The image viewing function is extremely inconvenient, first you need to click on the magnifying glass, then turn the wheel, I have been using it for more than a month, but I still can’t get used to it.