Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 115
  • 5
    86
  • 4
    20
  • 3
    7
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A really necessary purchase, I'm glad I found this product.

Because there was no possibility to compare it with other full-frame cameras. I always use only one, but still the 60d had 9 cruciform points ! Why they did so little here is incomprehensible . It would be better if they removed WiFi and GPS and put something more necessary in the camera. Control from a smartphone is not convenient, so show off among friends, no more. With a conventional remote control or synchronizers much more convenient. The absence of two slots for memory cards is not…

Pros
  • Full frame, excellent image quality, including at high ISO, light weight and good ergonomics, very fast autofocus on the center point, good price,
Cons
  • 11 AF points and only 1 of them cross-shaped, WiFi, GPS,

rating 5 only for those needs that he copes with for his money and now I will add a LOT of truth for those who like to read I took a replacement (700D + 18-135stm) for a long time tormented the Internet, forums, and so on. I chose 3 months, I thought I would buy 6D + 2 glasses right away and could not decide which ones, because. I love tourism, landscapes, macro and sometimes portraits, and the style is closer to reportage, so I wanted something for the base + macro or portrait ok, let's get

Pros
  • + ISO (any canon 600d, 650d, 700d, 60d, 70d as well as 6D - they make a little noise even at 100 iso, which is actually corrected in the editors . but from 1600 iso and above up to 6400 iso 6D leader) colors on large ISOs are not lost and raw files are processed a little easier, in general, everything they say about high ISOs from 6D is true ! + Colors, color reproduction is clearly 5-10 percent better than 700d and the higher the ISO, the more noticeable ! + Full frame, and to be more precise - depth of field (DOF) - it's just great for portraits and when you just want to highlight something =) + Handle grip is better than on crop cameras (more) + WEIGHT - one of the lightest among full-frame + review in the video finder (really there is a difference) + functions in the menu - auto focus correction, setting the minimum shutter speed in aperture priority mode, a detailed battery indicator (as a percentage from 1 to 100% - you will always know exactly the battery charge) and more . + Dust-moisture-protection - somewhere they write that it is not there, somewhere that it is, I will say this: each button is rubberized from the inside and it is felt, unlike the entire 500d-760d series, almost all the buttons are like mikriks in a mouse
Cons
  • - lack of other chips that canon 5Dm3 has -as well as the price at the moment is from 80000r + glass

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good product at a good price, I recommend to try it.

Switched from Nikon to Canon. The device in the settings is more meager, but everything seems to be enough. I thought I wouldn’t be able to without 39 focus points, it turned out I just need to be able to shoot correctly). I was only interested in ISO when switching to FF, because. focused on purity and quality. Reviews about iso are true. 3200 working, and if on more open holes from 2-2.8-3.5, then just do it perfectly. Almost a clean picture. Suitable for hobbyists/semi-professionals. You can

Pros
  • ISO, Grip
Cons
  • Not critical (to climb far for some settings)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Just super, the product is made wonderfully, very satisfied.

the best camera in the class in terms of price / quality ratio. except for one minus - the case is not protected from moisture at all. there is a review about the repair for 33 thousand due to the fact that they were used in the tropics with high humidity. same problem. I walked with the camera in heavy rain - the shutter button died, the cable rusted, the repair was 8 thousand. otherwise, the camera is worth buying, I would buy it boldly again, well, for a tropical climate, yes, you need to…

Pros
  • - at ultra-high ISOs, the best canon matrix after 1dx - convenient management - lightweight, for full frame - rate of fire -battery is good - autofocus is not the best, but the center point is excellent - dynamic range
Cons
  • - waterproof case - color reproduction is not perfect

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best deals, glad I bought this.

There are drawbacks, as with anything. But if hands grow from that place, then they can be turned into virtues. I recommend taking this camera and enjoy the quality and impression even from a random frame. Has some pros - build quality, the feeling of "serious technology" in the hands. - tenacious central focus point - a very logical arrangement of buttons on the case, there is something to complain about only for those who switch from expensive cameras to 6D. Who moves from amateur cameras…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best purchase in my life, I will definitely buy it again.

There are already quite good comments, there is no point in repeating, I will note one thing, do not seriously read reviews with one or two or three stars - these people write with errors, spelling and technical, they obviously bought the device on the sixth point of the advantages I described. The first four advantages clearly increase the quality of the photographic material, at least in comparison with three-digit models, the last two can be dispensed with. The disadvantage I wrote down is…

Pros
  • 1) Full frame (FF) - all optics will immediately become wider, and where it seemed that a vigorous width of 10 mm was needed, the usual lens is already working at 17 (although the price tag is not like that of 17-55); 2) colors . you can change the optics on the crop as you like, but on FF any glass will play differently, with the proviso that this glass is not for crop; 3) functionality . autofocus adjustment, direct buttons for the most necessary functions (except one) and an additional LCD screen - this is what an enthusiastic person clearly lacks on devices with a three-digit index (like 600D, I have one) - no need to constantly climb in the menu on the energy-consuming color display and 4 buttons. And another mode dial with a locking button; 4) the dynamic range is clearly wider, since the automatic exposure pair looks clearly better than on the 600D - there is no desire to make a correction. 5) tactile sensations . you hold in your hands and wave things! It is covered with pimply rubber in all holding places, the hand immediately feels another / expensive device purely by touch, but not by weight or size, the 600D, which I carried in my hands for two years, immediately seemed more slippery, the hand did not feel the difference in size or weight ; 6) show-off is more expensive than money . frankly, for some, (5DmarkIII would be better), having a full frame is also a virtue. I would not have written this paragraph, but I saw how some people chose such cameras.
Cons
  • 1) one obvious drawback that does not affect the masterpiece, but a marketing-explainable drawback - the lack of a BB button

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

In general, a solid full frame with an excellent picture! Iso can be safely lifted up to 6400! stripped-down mark3 can be said. I did not like the location of the buttons, but I liked the tenacious autofocus on the center point. A shutter speed of 1/4000 is just kapets . well, why should we? . a couple of times I got into awkward situations with fast lenses in good light. I had a WG version but didn’t use either one, maybe this function will be very convenient for someone. I will say this, it…

Pros
  • -High working ISO -Autofocus -Battery -Frame -Wifi -GPS
Cons
  • -exposure like an amateur camera 1/4000 - Gouno control

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great product, best quality.

Its pros: Full frame, new processor, working high ISO, Wi-fi (now it's very convenient to view photos on your phone right away), GPS, weight Its cons: not yet discovered after Canon 5D mark II found only pluses including focusing

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

I made the decision to stop on this particular model after reading reviews and reviews on many websites throughout the internet. "Crop" Canon EOS 450D did not fit me anymore, as I want a lovely picture that could only be provided by "full frame." It was feared that my older lenses with the "full frame" format would not function properly. Although if the image produced by the Canon EF 28-135 IS USM lens is not quite as "ringing-sharp" as those produced by lenses in the "L" series, it should…

Pros
  • In terms of its use for me, number one is full frame. 2) The capacity to make alterations to the emphasis. 3)GPS. 4)WI-FI 5)A low amount of weight
Cons
  • The covering of the upper portion of the body has a "toy" feel to it in some way. It has a dull appearance and rapidly attracts dust (and the camera is positioned as a "travel camera"). The GPS uses up the battery in a very short amount of time. The display's protective glass imparts a sense of "plasticity" to the overall impression (on my old 450th there was even a normal glass). There is no space available for a second memory card in this device.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not everything is so bad, but there are disadvantages.

I've been using it for a little less than half a year. The device is good. Although it sharpens the worm because of the DD, in general, I am satisfied with the purchase. I'm still playing with control from Android (wi-fi). Some pros: My first FF. Liked. And working ISO and AF tenacity, compared to my old man. Lenses came to life on it, especially old ones. The ergonomics are great. The old one is also not bad, but here it is directly addictive in a short time. Some cons: DD is just awful. This…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for the money, definitely recommended!

There is something to compare her to because I used the 5Dm3 for a whole year before I met her. I won't go into detail about the specialized aspects, but I will discuss the feelings: - The screen on the 5Dm3 is considerably superior than the screen on the 6D; it is much brighter, it does not glare, it does not get dirty as readily, and it does not become yellow, in contrast to the screen on the 6D; as a result, you find yourself consulting the histogram more frequently =) - Control feels more…

Pros
  • -Weight for ISO, and the full frame matrix (light) Wi-Fi is an extremely helpful technology that is far more user-friendly than rotary screens.
Cons
  • - I would like 10–20 additional focus points, or at the very least a second card slot; other than that, everything is fine. The most important thing is that the focal point is extremely resilient, performing no worse than 5dm3.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn³'t expect the quality to be this good.

Before her, I used 5Dm3 for a year, so there is something to compare with. I won’t write about technical differences, but about the sensations: - The screen of 5Dm3 is much better than that of 6D, it is much brighter, it does not glare, it is not so easily soiled and does not turn yellow, unlike the same 6D - it makes you turn to the histogram more often =) - Control for me personally is more convenient on 6D, maybe because before 5Dm3 I had 60D and I got used to doing without a joystick. In…

Pros
  • -Full frame - matrix, ISO - weight (light) - Wi-Fi is a useful thing, more convenient than a rotary screen.
Cons
  • - I would like 10-20 more focus points, at least a second card slot, otherwise everything is ok. The main thing is that the central point is very tenacious, no worse than 5dm3

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

I doubted the purchase for a long time with a 5d mk 2 in my hands I read reviews on the Internet, which made me doubt . in general, there is a feeling that 50% of the reviews are written either by people who have never held a camera in their hands or to order with the intention of deliberate slander, but this is not the point The camera is great - it's much more pleasant and easier to work, it takes less time to process in LR Autofocus is what you need)) after 5d mk 2 it's just a fairy tale…

Pros
  • Compact size, autofocus, sd card, weight, power consumption, matrix
Cons
  • 1 flash drive slot, display

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, I'm glad I chose this option.

I decided to change the brand with another one, so I shot a video. At first glance, it appears to be some type of pointless 6D. Dish for soap that is light and compact. The image of a spacecraft emerges as the second impression following use in hostile environments. Whoever films the video should know that the subject's true working ISO setting is 12800. Colors. The colors in Mark II are fantastic. Yet, the six are even more awesome. In addition, there are none of the agonizingly recognizable…

Pros
  • ISO, ergonomics, video 50 fps, CPU, microphone (!). I can't comment on the quality of the photos because I just use it for shooting video.
Cons
  • A robust moire pattern. While shooting in 720p, use soap. Moisture resistance - three, it is best to avoid going out in the rain as much as possible. A faulty screen (its characteristics and lack of auto-brightness adjustment).

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product did not cause delight, but you can use it.

The store brought 2 cameras to check. In the first one, the dust under the screen immediately caught my eye. The second had more dead pixels. I chose a second camera. After half a year (10000-15000 run), I began to notice a beautifully burning red dot. I began to look through the first photos taken by the camera, it is also present there, but not so bright and inconspicuous. Before buying a camera, be sure to check for dead pixels on the monitor. Also, after half a year, one pixel flew on the…

Pros
  • Feels good in the hand, light, sharp, the center point is just magical! Wi-Fi, video writes super, focuses in the dark. The battery lasts for 900-1000 photos
Cons
  • Splash protection only. Quality.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

More, why I wrote - no flaws. For me, no. Many people say that 1/4000 is shortcomings, a small number of focus points, only the center is crossed, and in general they are "bored" towards the middle, insufficient dust and moisture protection, etc. things, for me, as basically a landscape painter, are absolutely insignificant and, moreover, DESCRIBED in the characteristics. You do not read the characteristics before buying the device? This is strange. If you are reading, what is it? A special…

Pros
  • - high working ISO (3200 is generally easy, 6400 - if you suppress it adequately later, but for a home album at least 12800) - light camera weight, magnesium alloy frame (except top) - quiet pleasant sound of the mirror and shutter - basic dust and moisture protection - after 60D - almost the same controls
Cons
  • For me, there is no such

I recently purchased a Canon Eos 6D camera. Prior to that, I shot on the Canon Eos 5D Mark II for a long time. What differences did you immediately notice? Low noise matrix. Up to 3200 units can be set safely. I recently shot a photoset with natural light, ISO almost all the time was from 1600 to 3200. The result on the monitor pleased. The camera noise is noticeably less than the second five! If in the end you massage RAV-ku with a good noise reduction, there will be an excellent result. The

Pros
  • Low noise at high ISO Autofocus (center point) Ergonomics (several improvements)
Cons
  • They could have "sawed" a more advanced AF system into the camera .

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Practical product, nothing to complain about.

Practical and inexpensive machine. I especially like the video. Not RED and blackmagic. Stream for 50 mb and softly. There must be nature, light and so on. AND GLASS CORRECT! Some pros: Although morally obsolete, it is still very good for practice. Worked with different lenses. Manual, auto . Good glasses raise the device to a quite good level. You just have to work with him. I use video more. Interview, nature is excellent. The ancient 80mmx 1,2 Soviet lens gives such beauty. There is no money

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

For the money, this is an excellent and modern full-frame camera. It reveals itself well with L-class lenses. With its pros. - full frame - the picture is super; - good quality at high ISO; - great video; - GPS, Wi-Fi will be useful for travelers; - optics correction; - processing RAW files in the camera; - weight and dimensions; - price quality. Has some cons - 1/4000 sec. (you can solve this with a polarist); - no flash; - not rotary and not touch screen; - flimsy joystick…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The item was good, I'll recommend it to my friends.

The focus points do not cover most of the frame. Switching between autofocus points is not the most convenient, with a joystick it would be better. I really miss the 7D's autofocus system. If you are shooting outdoors on a sunny day, wide open, even at the lowest ISO, 1/4000 shutter speed may not be enough. I always have the white balance on the machine and almost always get the correct color rendition, if you don’t shoot in backlight. I have had a camera for two years now, overall…

Pros
  • Ergonomics, size, high working ISO, long battery life. Rate of fire.
Cons
  • For me, the biggest drawback is the auto focus system. Only 9 focus points and only one cross. There is no zone focusing system.