Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
📸 discover the high-performance canon eos r5 body, black - unleash your photography skills logo

📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills Review

13

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.4
Electronics, 📷 Camera & Photo, 📷 Camera & Photo Accessories

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(7)
img 1 attached to 📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills
img 2 attached to 📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills
img 3 attached to 📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills
img 4 attached to 📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills

Photos by authors

(11)
img 8 attached to 📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills
img 9 attached to 📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills
img 10 attached to 📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills
img 11 attached to 📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills

Description of 📸 Discover the High-Performance Canon EOS R5 Body, black - Unleash Your Photography Skills

Whatever you shoot, the EOS R5 lets you unleash your creativity in a whole new way. Capture stunning 45 megapixel photos at up to 20 fps. or cinematic 12-bit 8K RAW videos with full image sensor coverage. A state-of-the-art autofocus system uses artificial intelligence and deep learning, while built-in image stabilization works in conjunction with an in-lens stabilizer to compensate for camera shake up to 8 stops.

Reviews

Global ratings 13
  • 5
    9
  • 4
    2
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

Long awaited! So Canon R5! First impressions - great ergonomics! Super auto focus, which manages to cling to the eyes on the go, running, jumping! While we are waiting for the new 85-ku 2.0 macro, we took a native adapter (there was no kit) and the old lenses work great! But the center of gravity shifts to the lens. It lies comfortably in the hand, the strap is narrow (after the fourth brand it is unusual), in terms of weight - I didn’t notice any lightness, to be honest .) but given that…

Pros
  • Autofocus, ergonomics, convenient joystick, flip-up display, stabilization, pure color, 5 years warranty!
Cons
  • Expensive second memory card, large and expensive R series lenses, and all F lenses through an adapter have a forward center of gravity

Judging by the fact that the life cycle of the 5d mk4 released in 2022 came to an end, and there was no fresh announcement of 5dmk5, I prompted myself to think about changing the EF system to RF with all the consequences. First I bought R6 and for the first month I could not get used to it with compromises in the form of the absence of the usual optical viewfinder, normal grip, normal size of the main display and other sensations of a cheap plastic crop that the R6 caused. But the more I shot…

Pros
  • Dynamic range (at ISO 400 it is comparable to medium format) Colour Image size Noises autofocus The ability to turn on the classic 1.6 crop and work with any EF-S lens through the same EF-RF adapter and use unique and cheap crop glasses like sigma 18-35 f 1.8, etc. chamber jeep is perfectly processed by the camera and crushes noises up to 16-20,000 iso a battery that, after pumping, really lives in the device for 600-800 frames with a 120 FPS viewfinder and constant stabilization. Viewfinder and main display (better than R6) 12fps fire rate without the compromise of intermittent autofocus or blackout. A complete reporting set in a 45 megapixel camera. no blackout video 8k RAW (a reserve for the future and a good help for professional videographers)
Cons
  • The price relative to the R6 is unreasonably high when viewed from the perspective of a photographer. In terms of all the photo functionality between the cameras, the difference is not at all 150,000 Camera stabilization does not always work correctly in conjunction with the stabilization of the EF 70-200 2.8 IS of the first version, which is confirmed by both American users and kenon ambassadors. Moreover, with the release of the latest firmware, the problem remained on both R6 and R5. But it manifests itself much less frequently than on the old The body outside is all plastic, it is necessary to buy a protective sticker or a case for the camera in order to preserve the appearance, the magnesium alloy is now only as a power frame of the carcass inside. Drop it. get a crack, you'll change the hull. a battery pack at a completely inadequate price of 35,000. Previously, I took Chinese counterparts for all cameras and for the first time took the original (because there is simply no non-original on R5 and R6), which, well, corny is absolutely no better than their Chinese copies, which cost 10 times cheaper 20 fps with lower bitrate and DD Price. At first, it seems that in kenon they bent the stick with pricing for their R5 with a price tag of under 400,000, but after the dollar fell and the price was lowered by kenon itself, the price fell to 350 and to 320 for gray import

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product, more pros than cons.

Three months have passed, it's time to ate the review. The advantages of excellent autofocus, high speed and excellent results have been discussed many times. The camera feels good in the hand and allows you to get high-quality photos, especially with new lenses. Perhaps no one will note the high-quality UI, symbols and fonts of the display and viewfinder. All elements of the right proportions, the icons are uniform with balanced contrast. (Mediocre UI design makes you want to cry when you pick

Pros
  • Compared to EOS R - high speed, greater dynamic range, less noise at high ISO. Autofocus is beyond praise.
Cons
  • Savings on the outside. Plastic on-off selector. The buttons do not contrast with the body color. The accompanying mobile software could have been better. I would like to have aperture bracketing. Shutter slams hard. At 500 mm from a tripod at slow shutter speeds, it is almost impossible to get frames without blur, the electronic shutter saves (although, alas, it has a shutter speed limit of up to 1/2 second).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed! It was definitely worth the money!

in conjunction with Ninja V - a normal video combine. as a WORKING camera for photos - 10 out of 10 like video - 8 out of 10 I worked with sony nikon canon BMPCC fuji gfx - there is something to compare. No matter what anyone says, canon actually made the best hybrid camera so far.

Pros
  • The camera is perfect for the job. Eye focus at 1.4 even on non-native EF lenses - 99.9% really out of 20,000 frames - 2 small misses. DD is awesome. speed convenience ergonomics - no questions asked. Video quality (HQ) - covers Sonya a7s3
Cons
  • micro hdmi I don’t understand the logic . but it is solved by a cage + cable holders from small rig for example. no sound recording in 100-120 fps modes biting price for RF optics, which is also heavy and huge (L-ki) DD in the video (slog3) is one and a half lower than Sony (real dd) but you won't notice it.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy with the product, it's very satisfying.

I took it for one day for a test drive, so I only write about what I managed to try. I cancompare with my Rp, which I have been using for a year and a half. The image quality is at its best, according to the photonstophotos website, it is currently the best matrix in the world. The "margin of safety" of the shots is very large, you can easily stretch it to +4. Ergonomics are good, but there is a desire to please old photographers who are used to DSLRs. I can’t write it down as a minus, but in

Pros
  • Image quality, dynamic range Video quality Control Electronic viewfinder autofocus
Cons
  • Kenon's desire to raise more money from the sale of accessories and from the first buyers WiFi 2.4GHz Perhaps artificially made "overheating" when shooting a video

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, there are only minor drawbacks.

I took a camera to replace my Sony A7R3 for shooting architecture. I don't shoot videos, so I can't say anything about the video capabilities. At one time, I switched from Canon 5D Mark 3 to Sony because of the high resolution, now that Canon has acquired a 45 megapixel matrix, I decided to go back. In general, I am satisfied with the camera, not counting the shortcomings mentioned above. By the way, in terms of ISO, the camera certainly greatly surpes the Sony A7R3, but at the same time there…

Pros
  • - Very fast and accurate autofocus, including tracking, including with EF optics - Finally a good resolution for those who, like me, shoot for advertising and print pictures in large format - Light weight RAV files compared to compeors - When the camera is turned off, the shutter closes and the camera does not dust, this is very important for a mirrorless camera, where the matrix is ​​not covered by anything
Cons
  • I point out all the shortcomings compared to my previous camera - Sony A7r3: - The screen does not fold up / down like on Sony, but to the side. As a result, this "ear" constantly sticks out from the side. I wonder how long it will last with intensive work. - The battery is bad. It may still pump over after a while, but for now this is a disorder. - With the advent of new functions, the menu has become more confusing and, probably, soon, in terms of complexity and the number of abbreviations, it will approach Sony, which has always been a champion in this) - For those who use 6x and 12x magnification, working on manual gles, the return to the original scale does not occur when half-pressing the shutter release. It is necessary to poke a separate on. For me personally, this is inconvenient. I don't see the price as a downside. This is not an expensive camera, it's a cheap) Yes, and the market decides - if a camera is bought for this money, then everything is ok.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

I have a lot to compare this camera to, I have owned or used for a long time such masterpieces of camera construction as hasselblad x1d-50c, Leica Q2, Canon 5D first, some outstanding medium format film cameras, Mamiya. Hasselblad. Canon continues to be the gold standard in camera building for a wide audience in terms of image quality, ergonomics and overall user satisfaction. Unfortunately, competitors are not able to offer adequate alternatives, I really hope for Sony, Fuji and Nikon, but it

Pros
  • With the exception of minor flaws, Canon came to perfect ergonomics already in the 5D mark 2, in the EOS R5 the bar was raised even higher, the body of which a camera should have - a grippy, ergonomic "bar" with a comfortable grip, which is what Hasselblad does in his models for tens of thousands of euros and what is not yet visible to the minds of Sony engineers. Color reproduction and image quality - by the way, the maximum quality is obtained when RAW is developed in Capture One, I refine portraits in programs with AI, like Retouch4me Dodge & Burn, Photoshop and Lightroom have been less and less pleasing lately, in general, after Hassel, Capture One seems the most adequate as work and results!
Cons
  • With the exception of minor flaws, Canon came to perfect ergonomics already in the 5D mark 2, in the EOS R5 the bar was raised even higher, the body of which a camera should have - a grippy, ergonomic "bar" with acommfortable grip, which is what Hasselblad does in his models for tens of thousands of euros and what is not yet visible to the minds of Sony engineers. Color reproduction and image quality - by the way, the maximum quality is obtained when RAW is developed in Capture One, I refine portraits in programs with AI, like Retouch4me Dodge & Burn, Photoshop and Lightroom have been less and less pleasing lately, in general, after Hassel, Capture One seems the most adequate as work and results!

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Not advised to buy this, does not meet the advertised standard.

I will be brief r5 is an extremely controversial fotik. If he takes a videographer, he will be upset by overheating even in 4k. that is, Vydaki irrigators are swept aside. but it seems that there are videographers directors?) OK. it means a typical director's day - he sets up the camera, adjusts the light for two hours (either gaffers, or a large team in general), constantly checking with the camera . and then it overheats again and the team gets up. The only one who can take this camera is…

Pros
  • Good image quality 8k focus read comment
Cons
  • Overheat Price Lens price

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The average product, you can find a better one.

From the very beginning, errors periodically fell out, I thought it would be cured with firmware. But no. A year later, they fell like a cornucopia. And this despite the fact that the camera filmed for himself. Did not use for work. Shore. Result service center. In the current conditions, it is not known what to expect. Its pros: Comfortable grip with battery handle. Ease of use with non-autofocus lenses. Good screen and viewfinder. Quite nimble. With its cons. !First of all quality! It seems…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

Switched to R5 after 5d mk4. Choosing between R6 and R5 - I chose R5 as it offers me more opportunities in terms of shooting, 45mp, better viewfinder. Of the features: - If you already take R5, then it is desirable with a CFexpress card. - The R5's ergonomics take some getting used to. After MK4, fingers periodically look for buttons where they no longer exist, but I liked it more than R6 - Photo / video mode is changed by pressing 2 buttons, before it was one switch (which was returned in…

Pros
  • - Amazing autofocus, which gets better with each firmware. - A 45mp sensor is a plus for me, after shooting on R6, I realized that 20mp is not enough for me. - Image stabilization - Cool video features (great for shooting short videos!) - High burst speed - Old lenses have opened up in a new way and work great with this camera through an adapter - Shutter that closes the matrix during lens change - Swivel screen - High shutter life
Cons
  • - Decently eats a battery (take a spare right away) the rest in the comments, I do not consider this a disadvantage, rather a feature.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great quality, did not expect at all for the price.

I think that this is the only decent camera for stills (not for video) from this manufacturer at the moment, in addition to the equally worthy R6. In terms of ergonomics and convenience, it surpasses the A7 3, 5D3, 5D4, 1DX Mark 3, so for those who are considering one of these cameras, I strongly recommend the R5! . or R6, since it is cheaper and 20mps is a kind of golden gray on a 35mm frame, and for those who do not print on the wall, but shoot for the Internet - R6 will be the golden mean.

Pros
  • Ergonomics are finally on top. The camera is comfortable to hold with one or two hands when viewing footage. They returned the joystick and it is where it should be - from above under the thumb (after 5d3 and 5d4 this is a step in the right direction). Autofocus is really good, even with EF lenses. After the DSLRs, I forgot about the word alignment and back / front focus. The picture is juicy like all modern kenons, for work it’s the most, for the soul there is a first fiver and a medium format Hassel. There is no soap like in 5D3 on RF lenses, but I still shoot in MRAW more often. still a lot of data. For those who don't care about 45 mps, take EOS R6 with 20 mps. In general, R6 will be an ideal transition from many canon DSLRs, especially from 6D, 5D, 1DX Good stabilizer. Not truncated. a full-fledged shutter with 1/8000 sec, I think it should be at the level of the 5D series in terms of resource. LP-E6 fit and work (native)
Cons
  • I will ate the review. when I put sigma ART on it through an adapter. I wonder how it will work and whether it will. Expensive accessories at the start of sales. CF Express for good capacity and speed had to be taken bu. because I miscalculated. Charging from the Powerbank and via the USB wire, when it is already omnivorous like SONY, is very lacking. Although it still works with certain power banks. This is a very important function, since Sony forgot the last time when I got my own charger at all. To whom to shoot a video that R5 and R6 currently have unresolved problems with overheating. I take pictures, I have no problems. But for video, it's probably better to watch Panasonic or Sony, they have more sharpened systems and there is no such overheating.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

I have been shooting with Canon for over 20 years. There were many cameras. This is my first mirrorless. I thought for a long time about switching to without a DSLR, worried and chewed, but the working requirements for silent shooting did their job. At first, I shot simultaneously with the previous Canon 1DXm2 camera and this one, because it was hard to get used to ergonomics, but literally a week later I almost stopped shooting at “one” and after a couple of weeks I completely put it in the…

Pros
  • In description…
Cons
  • Of the minuses, not so tenacious batteries in comparison with DSLRs (it's good that they are compatible!) - Not so comfortable ergonomics (it would be more convenient in a nickel case) - Work through an adapter in cases with EF optics -Second memory card

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

I shoot photos and videos - 50/50. Before that, I used all the “brands” of 5D from Canon. The Canon 5D Mark IV is fine for me in terms of photography, but when shooting video, it causes pain and suffering. R5 brings only positive emotions. Different pros: What I think is important for me personally. I compare mainly with the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV. 1. Finally, 4K video files have a very modest size. You can select the compression level. 2. 4K video is taken from the full size of the sensor, not…