Well-balanced macro/near sharpness. For some reason, using this glass on the crop necessitates using the manual settings for both aperture and focus. Not much stands out as an improvement over the standard whale when it comes to P + AF. As the weather improves and I can take some photos in manual mode with MF, I may reevaluate the rating. Nonetheless, I'm not satisfied with the purchase. The lens is so delicate that even the slightest drop causes it to shatter, as reported by every reviewer.

I bought it from me for $25,000 when it was worth $35–50,000 in stores following price rises. Overall, I'm quite happy; I didn't like the sharpness in the whale 18-55, but everything is perfect here. I like the appearance, autofocus, sharpness, and everything else. I am extremely happy with the purchase because I no longer need to carry around a lot of glasses and have 24-105 with me.

An outstanding worker and member of the FF team personnel (I use it from 5dm2). Naturally, he does not have "enough stars" with his aperture and pattern, but he is quite consistent in terms of the outcomes he achieves under a variety of settings, which is something that is highly valued in the reporting genre. I am appreciative of it in this regard. By the way, I remember that not too long ago there was a time when the price difference between the 24-105/4 and the 24-70/2.8 (first generation)…

I won't repeat what has been said a hundred times—he is Elka, he is at the most widely used focal lengths, etc. Nonetheless, it is incredibly trite, literal, and predictable. He is like a Japanese robot; he is willing to perform everything with incredible quality, but he lacks creativity and inspiration. He also won't write poetry for you or draw a picture for you. The best option for a reportage, but not for a portrait, nor for capturing the beauty of nature or a sunset. I dislike universal…

Acquired simultaneously with the Canon 5D Mark II and used for a period of half a year. It is a good travel zoom since it is versatile and it covers all of the focal lengths currently in use. On the other hand, when it comes to artistic photography, I find that luminous lenses are more appealing. I decided to sell it and invest on a 135mm f/2 instead. Aperture 4 was simply not enough for me, and I am a proponent of corrections; as the staffer is portrayed by a 50mm f/1.4 lens, this is…

I think I had it for around six months before I sold it; I was after universality and I found it. I was able to sell it, and now I'm considering going for 17-40. well, perhaps for a variety of reasons, but I have come to the conclusion that I require everything to be precisely as it is, and the FR is not nearly as significant. I went on vacation to Spain, and although the country is beautiful, I didn't want to take pictures from a bus because I wanted to go up up and personal. Universalism is…

This lens excels as a general purpose option. There were 24-70 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 + Converter lenses available before that. It magnifies2 times and has an aperture of(.)50/1.4. As I do most of my shooting on vacations and in unfamiliar locations rather than in a fixed studio, portability and light weight have become important considerations. I got rid of the zooms and only took the universal, yet I still managed to leave fifty kopecks. This glass is top-notch in every way. In comparison to the…

cost me 22k instead of 15-85 when I bought it. With this one, we hit 28k. I honestly believed I was switching out soap for the awl, but the distinction was so striking that everyone could see it with their bare eyes. not necessarily a bonus, in reality not everyone likes pictures now, all the little hairs on the face, all the wrinkles, and so on have become obvious. The 60D crop is perfect for taking stunning pictures; my current favorite settings are 170mm at f/4.

Please don't hold my lack of experience against me too harshly. Yet, they have been using DSLRs for almost four years now. Before that, I tried a whale 18-55, then a fifty bucks 1.8 (which I loved for portraits), then an 18-135 (which I kept for two years and sold after only one week of use), and finally, a sigma 75-300 (which I also quickly resold). My mind kept going to L-ke. After deliberating for quite some time, I decided to read. This is what I decided on. So, I traded in my 18-135. When…

Approximately 2 years ago, I began using the Canon 5D. I initially stole it from a close buddy, but later I went out and bought it for myself. My friend utterly refused to sell me his own lens despite the fact that we were in the presence of a very large collection of lenses. I purchased a used lens over the internet that had a production date of just February 2022. At the time, there were complaints about the way the stub worked, but I ignored those reviews and bought the lens anyway. After…

Even though I shot my copy in the rain and it is now 5 years old, it is in perfect condition. By upgrading to a 6D from a 60D, I've noticed that the aperture ratio issue has all but vanished (FF is FF). If you want to portray yourself as a responsible actor, you should only use the RAF for your parallel shooting needs. It's true that you can get ringing sharpness from the fifty dollar 1,4; however, from the 24-105, even in manual mode and in RAF, you can tighten up the color rendition no worse…

They're much like any other workhorse, in that they may be put to use in a variety of settings, from the studio to the field. Used for posed portraits, cultural photography, and weddings. The greatest of the "universal lenses," in fact. Yes, there is a logical next step. The 24-70 F4 IS could be the next step, but its exorbitant cost puts it out of reach for most people, and reviews have been mixed. It also has its share of flaws, so if we were to rank Kenon's standard-issue universal lenses…

I find it useful for crop, as the available focal lengths meet my requirements. There is a width for use while photographing indoors. This lens is typically positioned over the carcass. The sharpness is excellent, though not as well as the 70-200/4 IS. Although it could have been an issue in FF, I think the lens hood could have been improved by making it deeper. I just can't give this lens the same kind of glowing evaluation that others have given it; for me, it's just an average lens that will

Cheerful as an elephant Before that, I used 50mm 1.8 for almost 1.5 years, the time has come when it's time to change the glass in accordance with the sensations. I bought it from a friend in the fall for 20 sput, he switched to 28-300L, he's also pleased that it was on time). I messed up, but first impressions are "yes, things." The photos are much higher quality now that their focal lengths are more manageable; for example, 105mm portraits look very sharp and tasty when cropped to 168mm and…

A fantastic lens for taking pictures in difficult lighting circumstances (in moderation, of course). Its aperture and focal lengths are just irreplaceable in a reportage. You can feel envious of people who started taking photos with this lens. Out of 300 frames taken with my lens, only one is smeared in the report. Excellent in the studio (assuming you don't have repairs). Obviously, the cost is not low, but considering the stub, it is (somewhat) worthwhile.

For the past eight years, I've been looking through this lens. And he never had any issues, not even in temperatures as low as -30 degrees, not even in the heat, not even in the rain, and not even in the muck. If you insist on finding fault, you won't be able to use a polarizing filter if the lens hood is already attached, and I'd prefer a wider aperture. But the marketers at Canon are steadfast in their stance, insisting that customers pick between a stabilizer and aperture when making their…

You can shoot anything at all. There is no merit to criticisms of the use as a portrait painter. 100-105 mm at the long end is suitable for a portrait. If you utilize one lens to replace a set of two lenses, such as 24-70 and 70-200, you will gain a lot of weight. The 24-70 and 70-200 Canon lenses are all top-notch, and they work well at both apertures of 2.8 and 4 and with and without a stub (70-200 of course). But, it is a bit hefty to carry around two lenses when you don't need to. The two…

It seems the lens is rather content. Its "L" moniker is not without merit; the image quality it provides is superb. Its autofocus is exceptionally persistent (even at dusk it starts to act up almost in complete darkness). Outside, it produces stunning images, but indoors, the camera's small aperture becomes apparent. When paired with a fixed 50 f/1.4 street-indoor lens, I believe it will shine. I wouldn't wear it without a hood around him because of his affinity for hares.

This is a topic I've been wanting to explore in writing for quite some time now. In my opinion, this is one of Canon's most underappreciated lenses. It is certain that the lens is only compatible with full-frame cameras. The crop he had had a lens equivalent to a toy whale zoom. The image showed on the full frame, complete with sharpness and bokeh—in other words, all the strengths. It's a must-have for every photographer or filmmaker, as it can be used for both reportage and studio work. For…

I've had the kit with the 5dm2 for almost two years now and have used it extensively. Overall, first reactions are favorable. Having read evaluations, I can attest to the fact that the f/4 compensation is mentioned in connection with the stub. While this is true while recording still scenes, it is not always the case. For example, if the first dance of the young is going to be held in a normal, spacious restaurant like the Paradise Hall on Domodevskaya (which can hold 500 or more people)…