Has some pros A good range of focal lengths, a nice zoom on the far end on the crop (equivalent to ~ 170 mm), lightning-fast focusing, reliability. Cons below: still dark. shooting under the roof requires a flash, and an external one, well, the weight is clear - why demand from Elka, the price could be thrown up .

If you want to get the most out of your money, a reportage is your best bet, especially for portraits and ordinary photographs. In landscape photography, although the colors are good, the overall picture is rather uninteresting, correct, and mundane. This is because the picture was shot correctly. Got pros: Build quality is excellent, and there is no backlash or looseness anywhere. Elk, after all. Neither heavy nor cumbersome in size. The quality of the picture possesses its own volume and…

Has some pros amazing lens! for a year of use, I managed to visit a variety of conditions . not a speck of dust, not a dirt, . With its cons. did not notice as such. they are rather problems of the hands of the shooter.

With its pros. Good stock lens. The stabilizer, especially out of habit, delivers a lot of pleasant moments. With its cons. Not a fast lens, which, however, is fully compensated by the stabilizer.

filter was purchased used for over 25 thousand dollars. There is no back-front. there are no chips or scratches, and both the zoom and focus mechanisms function perfectly. I was worried that it would be limp and soapy, but it turned out to be neither of those things. It looks like I got lucky. When considering the cost, it more than justifies itself by a factor of 150. The available funds will determine whether or not a new one should be purchased. Pros:\sL-ka. Yes, everything that they say is…

More than two years ago, I purchased a kit that included a 5dm2 and have been using it ever since. Impressions are positive. After reading some reviews, I noticed that some of them stated that the stub makes up for f/ 4. You are partially correct in that this is the case when photographing static scenes. If we assume that the first dance of the young will take place in a typical and spacious restaurant, such as the Paradise Hall on Domodevskaya (which has a capacity of more than 500 people)…

In the grand scheme of things, this is the first Elka after whales, 2022 glasses via the ring, after 50mm 1.8, 35mm 2, 28mm 2.8, and the rest of a bunch of different leased glasses, but Elka is the first in life. The color reproduction is spot on, in my opinion, and the glass remains razor-sharp at all times, which is quite remarkable after using so many different lenses. He was using a Canon 700D when he came into my possession, and even on that camera, the sharpness and color reproduction are

An fantastic lens as a universal zoom, for landscape, cityscape, reportage. Travel lens. It was because of the 24-105 that I made the conversion from Nikon to Canon three years ago. I don't regret it. Obviously, solutions are the way to go. Other lenses manufactured by "Canon" are better suited for "artistic" portraiture, genuine "macro," and the expert photography of architecture. Around sixty lenses make up the optics "Canon." If a person traveling with a 5D-2 can only shoot with ultra-fast…

I was really dissatisfied with this lens when I bought it and used it to take my first pictures because the shots with an open aperture were foggy and dark. I started to comprehend the issue, read numerous articles and reviews, tested it on a target, in the street, and in the studio, and as a result, I discovered that the working aperture for cameras with a crop factor begins at 5.6. When I later switched to full frame, the issue was resolved and the lens was sharp at any aperture and focal…

I almost didn't buy it. Only use it on the road, when you can't switch lenses and still need a lot of flexibility. The small (relative) size also adds to the practicality and efficiency. Everything else is just wrong. It's odd that "L" is on such a terrible lens. Keep in mind that the rest of my lenses are "L," as in "fixes," as well. The worst letter "L" I have in my bag.

The requirement for an external puff is based on. Even at 24mm, the lens hood casts a shadow on the subject; nevertheless, this is a minor issue, and a protective filter is essential. The 77mm lens is just begging to get scratched)))). Using the 50D's programming interface, I will make a little correction to the backfocus. This is a glass that I have desired for a very long time to purchase for myself. Short focusing distance; quickly compared to other L-kami - equivalents. This minimum FR-24…

While I won't dispute the quality of the lens, I do want to bring up an issue with the image stabilization. Perhaps it's my camera's lens. When the aperture is fully open, the stabilizer functions properly. If we change the aperture setting from its default of f/4 to, say, f/10, the stabilized photographs become blurry. In most cases, disabling IS results in superior photo quality. After each shot, the image in the viewfinder is pushed to the side, and the stabilizer resets to its original…

For those who currently shoot on full-frame or who want to do so soon, purchasing this lens makes sense. There is a great 17-55/2.8 IS lens for individuals that crop their images. Both 24-xx L-zooms are unusable for "normal" use because they lose their broad angle on the crop. Since 24-105 is the closest in class and price to 24-70, it makes sense to solely compare the two. Since this is a new class of method, it is not worthwhile to compare it to inexpensive zooms like the 28–135; instead, the

The lens presents an unhurried, contemplative, and intellectual perspective on the universe. Position: preferably portrait, portrait, still life, or interior scene It may be said that it is not at all ideal for landscapes in any way. In addition, it is not appropriate for weddings or reports. Can't keep up with the fast pace of the action. Haste is pointless. Despite the fact that the IS prefers a tripod and a steady hand, you can still use it. Photographs art objects, portraits, and studio…

Many people recall that this lens originally cost 32–31tr, but after a few years the price dropped significantly to 23tr. This is because these lenses eventually break down and require repairs, which cost 8tr. As a result, Canon decided to sell your lens twice—once in a store and again in a service. (23 + 8 = 31 tr.) My opinion is that I made a mistake by purchasing this lens; it would have been better if I had instead purchased the 28-135 YSM (which is the same as the above but does not have…

Excellent lens. The use of a camera is indispensable in news reporting. She looks very polished and artificial in pictures. My third L-ka, and after trying it once, I couldn't say no. The quality is often cited as a source of concern in the many articles written about it. Maybe I got lucky, but when I took it out of the whale's mouth on purpose, I discovered that it was razor sharp from 4 on and had no fronts or backs anywhere in the entire spectrum. The stabilizer is really helpful; it reduces

Weak compared to the 28-135, which is only a third of the price. A little better and heavier structurally, but the picture quality of the 28-135 is far higher. With 28-135, I went to pick 24-105, did so, removed both under similar circumstances, and returned the 24-105. The price they're asking is ridiculous. At the price, you will be really dissatisfied with it. I was sure once again that the dreaded "L" means separation or divorce (with the exception of some models, which everyone already…

For the lazy person who doesn't want to bring or buy additional lenses, this is often extremely good glass for everyday use. In other words, you can get a decent image. However, I didn't go into detail regarding visual distortion and other such nonsense. The photographer and the corpse are both crucial factors. Several people, for instance, have told me that this specific glass works better on FF. While I did not verify this information on my own, I intend to purchase a 6D. I won't give them…

Everything that is darker than 2.8 should not be given an L, except for the red strip, which is given an unjustified L. I work in technology, and I believe plastic should be used for high-quality optics (read fast). The "none" pattern indicates that this lens does not produce creative images when used with any sauce. The exception is when you need to "so that everything is sharp" when shooting in a studio. Travel, then.

Fabulous telephoto lens for reporting. Consistently reliable; a workhorse. Of course, this is not a lens for taking artistic shots, but that's not what it's for. Of course, the 24-70 F/2.8 is superior in terms of image quality, with completely functional 24mm and 70mm portraits that are considerably more intriguing, etc., but it also costs significantly more, despite the lack of a stub. When considering the lens's price, its many drawbacks are outweighed by its benefits. You'll need to…