Pros
- focal length range, a subpar aperture, construction, and sharpness (I really like sharp objects) swift changeover to MF general reporter, as well as a stabilizer, naturally
Cons
- Before I realized, everything was completely fulfilled.
Pros
- The lens has become so popular that few people are aware of its existence, despite Canon having released a number of cameras capable of recording video.
Cons
- This lens has only one flaw—its aperture ratio—that prevents it from being used by professionals.
Pros
- The most popular focal length range for a complete matrix All focal lengths produce remarkably sharp images. Inclusion of a stabilizer (you never know - someone definitely needs it). Fast and precise focusing can be achieved in practically every situation. a modest mass
Cons
- Although for a 4.0 hole and the output image it is not quite good, the price is not high enough. Although there is adequate color reproduction, the image does not have vibrant hues.
Pros
- You won't need a flashlight; focusing is remarkably perceptive and precise for how little light there is.
Cons
- Is there anything bad that can happen if you make a deliberate decision?
Pros
- Sharpness, a stabilizer (a sharp handheld shot was acquired at a shutter speed of 1.3 seconds), and a focal range that is practical for use were all present in this camera. If you are concerned about the weight of the camera, my recommendation is that you use the Jupiter 21M with the 450d setting. The camera is perfectly balanced.
Cons
- Nobody seemed to notice the fact that the electric sound had the most distortion when played through 24 barrels and 105 cushions. I won't say that it throws me off too often because the program has it under complete control, but it's definitely there. Because almost everything, from the ear to the moon, is sharp, it is important for me to choose the background for the objects very carefully. If I want there to be less flu, I must do this.
Pros
- The lens is well-made, has a wide range of useful focal lengths, produces vibrant and natural-looking photos in good light, and has a steady, reliable, and steadying effect. That's probably all there is to it
Cons
- In other words, if you use a lens with the same focal length and aperture (say, F4 and $50), you'll get dark images at both F-numbers. up to F5.6, chromatic aberrations are present, but after that they disappear. After that, everything is normal except for some minor foaming along the lens's open aperture's seams. A poor choice for use in video production (paradox)
Pros
- To begin, its adaptability, as it can be used in a variety of contexts. Rapid ultrasonic focus. Dust-moisture-proof (repeatedly removed them in light rain, everything is ok) (repeatedly removed them in light rain, everything is ok). For such a zoom, the image has good clarity and color reproduction. The stabilizer is excellent in every way!
Cons
- There are not very many of them: The absence of a zoom ring lock at the initial position of 24mm (the lens falls out on its own weight, however the ring moves pretty elastically, but not tightly (as it should be)) Chromatic aberration that is quite strong when shooting full frame at 22MP resolution.
Pros
- fantastic value for the money. I'd even say it's a great value for the money for a universal lens. a kind of middle level workhorse.
Cons
- Yes, but also a firm no. MB is bulky, but L must pay for this.
Pros
- focus hit was almost 100%, USB, focal lengths, and tenacity.
Cons
- Even on the crop, you can see a loss of crispness in the corners; I had hoped for better.
Pros
- Reliable. in terms of focal lengths operational. The stabilizer is effective in performing its function. at 105 mm from one tenth of a second. 105 millimeters produces very high-quality portraits. Even more so for a studio. Nothing comes loose or jiggles in the copy that I have.
Cons
- Historically, a score of 4.0! So you should just learn to live with it. And try not to take offense at what he says. He does not dislike you. It indicates that it should not be done. It has no bearing on the topic at all. Just one rung down from the top of the ladder. Not dust and moisture resistant. But, if you handle it poorly, the submarine will sink in the water.
Pros
- Cost-effective, flexible, and lightweight.
Cons
- A little on the dim side, and, once more, too adaptable, which prevents you from taking the best potential photos at certain focal lengths and stifles your artistic freedom.
Pros
- Adaptable, which is a benefit. Ideal for a staff position. Lightweight (compared to 24-70L as a popular option) (compared to 24-70L as a popular alternative). Stabilizer (although the prior generation) (albeit the previous generation).
Cons
- Universal and negative effects result from this. On a 21MP FF sensor, the lens is operating at its maximum resolution, resulting in substantial chromatic aberrations (3–4 pixels thick) and geometric distortions at the far end. With a rotating front lens and a "vacuum cleaner"-style design, it's unfortunate that the casing could not be made entirely closed. "Bokeh" is a type of calculating, inanimate computer. a little bit overrated.
Pros
- Price, adaptability, and overall quality It's crucial to consider size. fits within the most compact container that is both shockproof and waterproof that I was able to find recently.
Cons
- missing from this category entirely. I immediately checked "lathers at 4" — it does not lather — and "loses sharpness at the edges" — reliably checked when removing the grid — it does not lose sharpness. After reading the complaints in other reviews, I bought the product and put it to the test. Regarding the issues with the "stabilizer," everything appears to be in working order at this point. I hope it doesn't break as it broke on my sigma 18-200
Pros
- Craftsmanship, a stabilizer, and precision beginning at F4
Cons
- Vignetting
Pros
- Superb performance; wide dynamic range; crystal-clear display.
Cons
- The price may be a little hard to wrap your head around, but it's reasonable considering the value you receive.
Pros
- Stabilizer, available focal lengths, all-around sharpness, and adaptability
Cons
- Image, Cost, and Distortion (perspective distortion)
Pros
- Focal lengths available in every standard. The appearance is rock solid. light as a feather. Comfortable to the touch. Rapid and silent autofocus. The result is not unsatisfactory. cheap cost.
Cons
- This is a small lamp. He wouldn't be asking anything if the lens were F/2.8. It's a bad growing environment overall.
Pros
- Autofocus speed more than 5 Color rendering Nice job stub
Cons
- unable to locate
Pros
- Robust construction, quick motor, smooth operation, pleasant grip, stabilizer, attractive design, affordable price; fast and persistent autofocus; crisp; relatively large range of focal lengths; good color reproduction; great picture when recording video.
Cons
- Commonly, apertures do not have a large enough angle of view.
Pros
- The focal length spectrum
Cons
- Colors, you say?
