For my part, there is just one thing that I want to say: after purchasing the 5D mark II, this lens revealed itself in such a way that there was nothing else close by! Previous to that was (60D). On the old carcass, there wasn't much at all, and even this lens brought in a respectable amount of money, but after purchasing MARKOFBA, lo and behold! Its lens displayed all of its splendor to the user. The only thing I did was adjust it so that it aligns with the 5 mark II standard, and I don't want

Superb lens! For L-ku, the pricing is reasonable and in line with the product's quality. Simple to use, medium weight, and excellent drawings The luminance is the primary drawback. Lathers, f4 is obviously not working. Even though it pushes you to increase the iso inside without a flash, it is already always sharp at f5.6. inferior to fixes in the same price range, but they preserve the 24-105 focal range. I photograph at 60D since the wide angle is insufficient, but the portrait is fantastic…

This is a fantastic, expert reportage lens. Its adaptability, dependability, and results that are predictable are reasons why I enjoy it. There are no unsharp lenses in Canon's professional line, despite what some reviews on this site said. After the purchase, the "carcass" and any autofocus glasses need to be taken to the authorised service for alignment! Excellent stabilization completely makes up for the "dark" f/4 aperture. As a staff member, I suggest it to everyone - for full frame and…

I needed a normal lens for the 60D, so I purchased this one. Everything is working perfectly, but where is the sharpness that L-cams are known for? It is not completely divulged on the crop; the FF owners are the only ones who sing his praises. That is not something that should be discussed with people who own crops. Nonetheless, when used with a crop sensor, it will perform marginally better than a whale lens would on the Mark. It has been determined that this is a whale encased in a robust…

The combination of this lens and the 7D's 70-200mm f/2.8L USM is a great combination for me. After debating between the 24-105, the 15-85, and the 17-40, I finally went on the former because of his adaptability. After using the 15-85 for about two months, I realized that there is a price to pay for flexibility in a camera lens. This is not to say that the 15-85 is a bad lens; on the contrary, I just wasn't happy with the clarity when shooting at 15mm and an open aperture. If you're on the hunt…

This is generally the first Elka following whales, 2022 glasses via the ring, 50mm 1.8, 35mm 2, 28mm 2.8, and the rest of a number of other rented glasses, but Elka is the first in life. After using all the other lenses, the glass is always sharp, which is very unusual. I believe the color reproduction is flawless. He was holding the Canon 700D when he fell into my hands, and even with that camera, clarity and color reproduction are at their best. All 24-105 whales and other non-aperture…

I use this lens as an addition to the 70-200 / 2.8 on a 1Dx carcass. 70-200/2.8 - shooting duels, 24-105/4 - general plans, group photos. Sometimes I use it as a landscape painter on 5D2. In these cases, when shooting slowly or in good light, there are no complaints. The lack of aperture can affect the dynamic shooting indoors. Some pros: convenient, practical, versatile L-class lens. At the minimum fr on ff - a good landscape painter, at the maximum fr and on the crop - a telephoto. Has cons…

At the moment, my favorite lens for shooting various events and events. Different pros: Pretty sharp. Aperture 4 gives beautiful bokeh. Not very heavy, by the way. Filmed a wedding with him and also with an external flash, like nothing, tolerable. Great for reportage photography. There is a focus "to infinity" that when shooting landscapes you do not need to focus on something specific. Stabilizer. Different cons: The focal length starts at 24mm, which is quite narrow for shooting indoor events

- big distortion at 24-35 - the front lens fogs up a lot when the temperature changes (outdoors / indoors). 5-15 minutes of shooting crashes. I'm still looking for a solution - focuses on a moving object for a long time - still it's not up to L-ka - However, I like its blurring of the background - it turns it into a kind of homogeneous gray mass - Good lens sharpness Some pros: Good background blur at long focus Sharpness across the frame Some cons: - big distortion at 24-35 - focuses on…

Paired with a canon af 24-105L lens, they work just perfectly, the stabilizer saves in dark rooms, as a result, the images are clear. Fotik liked it very much. I chose between 7 and 60, as a result, those functions that are in 7-ke seemed to me not so convincing that I should pay extra 15for them. Different pros: I liked the control of external flashes. Shutter operation. Pleasant to the touch. Photo quality. Video recording, although many say that it is not very necessary, but the…

For those who are eager to conquer photographic horizons. but don't want to buy a bag with top fixes, Take this miracle for a year until you understand exactly what you need, you will definitely have enough of it! Pros: I think that for the first L on a crop, it justifies the hopes. Not hard for women's hands, after a week you get used to it and you can easily shoot with at least one hand! , sharpness. Different cons: Darkness is felt right away ! and this is not a small minus . When you use 50

PLEASE BUY A 77mm PROTECTION FILTER Different pros: According to the picture, there are no complaints for those who are particularly demanding on sharpness, hold down the aperture to one and a half atoms and two steps more. 24mm f+1, 70mm f+1.5, 105mm f+2. The stabilizer is just great, everything is 5+ Has some cons 1) Like all Canon lenses, this specimen has a disgusting front cover, it is better to immediately replace it with a Chinese one with a rope and internal gripping lugs. 2) The lens

A good regular lens without childhood diseases. Maybe this is subjective, but at a wide angle the sharpness is higher than at the far end. Its pros: Sharpness (if you want it to ring, turn off the stabilizer). Stabilizer (when sober, it manages to get sharpness at 1/15 - 1/25 at the far end) Universality (analogues of quality - the price for a lens that can be used as a universal one I did not find) Dustproof, moisture-proof, strong case, humane for L size, weight. Its cons: He loves to…

Glass is undoubtedly good, reliable, almost indestructible. Just for reporting. Everything is fine, at least XA, the sharpness is already excellent with f4, but it’s somehow tasteless) the picture from it will not be remembered for anything . or maybe this is not necessary) Different pros: -Moisture protection -Excellent stub -Universal focal lengths -Sharpness already from f4 is excellent -Auto focus Different cons: Vacuum cleaner, och quickly picks up dust because of the retractable…

I shoot mostly sports on 5 D M2. I try to shoot in the sun, indoors with a flash. And only in RAW. Much different from a Jeep. The lens must be chosen when coming to the magician with a camera and a good laptop. The lens is definitely worth the money. Its pros: Great lens. Decent picture at wide focus. At 105 it's super sharp. Assembled perfectly, tactile and visually pleasing. Got cons: The only drawback is the trunk and the price of the officials.

Awesome lens for: 1. Everyday photo shooting, thanks to its versatility. 2. Shooting video! Here all its advantages are revealed, and the disadvantages fade into the background. Manual focus is a pleasure, the zoom is smooth and silent, the stub perfectly 'holds' the picture. Pros below: Universal focal constant aperture Diameter for a light filter (77mm, no need for a second one at 70-200) Wide focus ring Backlight keeps excellent Stub is not bad Its cons: Someone says that this is…

Personally, I am satisfied, if you want maximum quality - buy fixes. And as a universal lens for reportage shooting, this one is just right. Its pros: Fast autofocus Autofocus doesn't miss The build quality is amazing! (L-series) 24-105 universal focal Stabilizer Comfortable in the hand, ergonomics No obvious distortions, aberrations Price Cons below: Do not expect sky-high sharpness like on fixes 4L is still a bit dark for home shooting, but just right on the street There is no…

Overall, I would give 9 out of 10 for zooms. If you plan to shoot outdoors, there is probably no better lens right now, although it all depends on the goals. Quite decent portraits, decent macro and covered focal lengths make the lens versatile. This is a kind of all-rounder among zoom lenses. Pros: 1. main plus in covered focal lengths 2. Dust-moisture protection allows you to carry it anywhere 3. macro function. Of course, it cannot be compared with special macro lenses, but if you need to…

For your money, if you take a worthwhile thing from the listing, especially for portraits and everyday photos, a reportage. In landscape shooting, although the colors are good, the overall picture is rather trivial, correct and boring. Got pros: Build quality, everything is tight and without backlash-elk after all. Lightweight and compact. The quality of the picture, especially for portraits, has its own volume and plasticity, micro-image of optics, contrast. Good sharpness on FF and crop up to

bought used for 25k plus filter. no back-front. no chips or scratches, perfectly working zoom and focus mechanism. I was afraid that it would limp and soap - nothing like that. apparently lucky. for such a price - it justifies itself by 150 percent . whether to buy a new one is a matter of the budget. Pros: L-ka. Yes, everything they say is true. and do not think that this is a brand, a marketing ploy or something else - this glass proudly wears this letter. chic color reproduction (not on a…