Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
📷 high-performance canon ef 24-70mm f/2.8l usm lens: ideal zoom for canon slr cameras logo

📷 High-performance Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Lens: Ideal Zoom for Canon SLR Cameras Review

17

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.6
👓 Lenses, 📷 Camera & Photo

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(1)
img 1 attached to 📷 High-performance Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Lens: Ideal Zoom for Canon SLR Cameras

Details

BrandCanon
Lens TypeStandard
Compatible MountingsCanon EF
Camera Lens Description70 millimetres
Maximum Focal Length70 Millimeters

Description of 📷 High-performance Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Lens: Ideal Zoom for Canon SLR Cameras

EF mount; standard zoom lens; Comes with Lens Cap E77U, Rear Lens Cap, Lens Hood EW-83F, Soft Lens Case 1219. Ultra-low Dispersion glass with Fluorite elements; inner focusing ring; full-time manual focus; aspherical lens. 24-70mm focal length. f/2.8 constant maximum aperture. UltraSonic Motor (USM) AF actuator.

Reviews

Global ratings 17
  • 5
    11
  • 4
    6
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing for the money, glad I did it.

I thought for a long time to buy a fix 50 / 1.2 or 24-70, but the choice fell on the zoom! Focusing is faster than that of fixes and sharpness is like a razor, color reproduction is excellent, everything is cool! Buy and you will not regret for the wedding reportage is very convenient!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

In conjunction with the canon 1, this solution is operational and satisfies 95% of the requirements. I use two DSLR cameras and two lenses—a 24-70 f/2.8 II and a 70-200 f/2—for my work.8 is II are sufficient, and if you take one, merely a 24-70 f2 lens should do.8 II.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product did not disappoint, the quality pleases.

Got pros: Not replaceable when shooting a report, in this range, when there is still 70-200mm in stock. Has cons: A year later, autofocus began to slip (growls does not focus) failures with a joyful smile, reporting a gray lens.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing Ive ever used, a great item for everyone!

Make your decision with care! As it happens, after making the necessary adjustments, a razor! The second one understood what the first had been like and was immediately sharp!) It would be here, but there would be a hole of at least 2.0, and there would be no trunk! He would be golden!

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like everything, the price and quality are acceptable.

Don' something in between, that is, banquets, are not afraid of backlight, almost do not limp, the eyes are quite cloudy, at 3.5 they are better, at 5.6-8.0 the clearest, it is already dark, and you need to unscrew the ISO, Don' something in between, that is, banquets, is not afraid of backlight, almost does not limp, Don' something in between, that is, banquets, is not afraid of backlight I am aware that some people claim that it retains its sharpness regardless of the aperture it is set to…

Pros
  • Luminosity, color rendering, ideal weight, trunk latch-clamp, and versatility are some of the other features.
Cons
  • The sharpness isn't all that great, the body is made of plastic, and some people have complained about the rubber bands ripping off. Additionally, the trunk sometimes leaves itself underweight, which results in a high price.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

I purchased it in Hong Kong not so long ago at the price of 84 Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM with a Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM. My attention was drawn to the piercing sharpness of the eyes, and I could see not a single flaw in any of the five photos. 2) In addition, some additional contrast and color rendering 3) Yes, in my opinion, this is the most significant advantage, and it seems to express itself better on the face. But even so, 85 mm and 1.2, it is impossible for me to compare the two

Pros
  • 1) Extremely sharp in comparison to the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens 2) The focus is spot on. 3) The bokeh is fantastic. 4) The architecture is breathtaking. 5) The ride is really quiet and unruffled. 60 The newer model is lighter and more compact than its predecessor, and the lens hood in particular has been shrunk down.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product suited me, I will recommend it to my friends.

I have wanted it for a long time, I hope the above problems will not arise soon. Has some pros: Universal focal lengths, really working 2.8 (perfectly sharp on it), Cons below: Weak coverage of the front lens, Over time, the trunk becomes loose, the diaphragm is changed.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

Whatever the advantages of this lens, you still need to think 10 children's), I twist up to 4-8 Plus, under heavy loads and fatigue, there is always a tremor in the hands, after using it for a year, I replaced it with 24-70 f / 4 L is, there is my favorite 70-200 f/2.8 In short, But the stub is a huge plus.

Cons
  • First of all,

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The quality is at the highest level, be sure to try it.

24-105, 70-200 II and 85 1.2 there is no XA as such, in general, damn it, II, I have them 1 out of 100 of course, 35, 50, 70) guys, in short, this is the best regular lens on planet Earth.

Pros
  • From and to
Cons
  • the hood is stupid in every way, it is extremely difficult to remove the lid with the hood on

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A reliable product, quality is acceptable.

I was looking for a magical lens that takes "those very photos." Unfortunately, 135, Nothing to complain about, then first try the 135th, 70-200, and then this lens.

Cons
  • Price / picture ratio.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Impressive Lens for Exceptional Photography

The Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L lens is an amazing addition to my photography gear. Based on our own experience, this lens produces outstanding image quality with exceptional sharpness and contrast even in low light condition. The build quality of this lens is solid and perfect for heavy use in the field. However, the weight of the lens could be a concern for some users especially if using this on a smaller camera body. Overall, this lens is an excellent investment for anyone who is serious about…

Pros
  • High quality images with sharp details and vivid colors.
Cons
  • Expensive compared to similar lenses on the market.

later I'll start by saying I've had all three current Canon lenses at a standard zoom: 24-105 f4 L IS, 24-70 f2.8 L II and this one is 24-70 f4 LIS. I'll explain it below, but if you read no further than this sentence, just buy this lens (and buy it if you can!). I'm a gear freak and having shot with all three lenses I can honestly say that this lens is the best of all worlds when you can only carry one lens around. Sure it can't do portraits as well as the 24-70 f2.8 L II, but in almost every…

Pros
  • Focal length 24-70mm
Cons
  • I'll write

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Sharp, durable and versatile

I love landscape, travel and macro photography and I think the 24-70 4L IS USM suits me. Here's what I thought about it after a few months of use. The CONSTRUCTION is excellent: high quality plastic, weatherproof seals, attractive semi-gloss finish and strong metal fixings. Electrical switches are powerful and are unlikely to be accidentally changed. The knurled rubber zoom and focus rings are large and comfortable and positioned the same as my 17-40L and 70-200 4L IS. Appearance is similar to…

Pros
  • Ultra-low dispersion glass with fluorite elements; inner focus ring; constant manual focus; Aspheric lens
Cons
  • Damaged