Didn't expect this device to compete with the Canon 70-200 L f/4 Bought for 5 now it costs under 10 users/kalinin-a/album/218761/

In my estimate, the Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 Pros of this lens: High optical performance! which happens due to the mistakes of the photographer himself - long exposure and camera shake, and not due to the peculiarities of the lens (like a fifty-fifty soap) the pictures became sharper, this lens has a focal length of 64 “In search of the ideal staff member” (all rights belong to the author of the article): Com/24575 f/2.8 STM: Com/691226 f/2.8 although with nuts, but the half-tone bokeh is its

I bought it after the whale one, get enough sharpness from it, I try different modes on the street, but it still doesn’t come out very well, then the iso camera will pull a lot, sometimes up to 3200 in cloudy weather, Often the pictures are obtained like this in sharpness:

I shoot on 50D, mm universal rubber hood for it, I had to lengthen the tube with a mandrel from the filter by 5 yes, I had to buy a new cover, more comfortable, Com/pgraph? z=photo11651498_293664332%2Fphotos11651498 Php? fbid=338009079635144&l=375db672f5

The main complaint is the presence of noise when shooting video what is here v=aGMltY72 Even stronger than on non-STM whale 18-55 (there it is MUCH quieter) soap dish, don't get fooled by this acronym for Canon 40mm! You can' Only with an external mic and a 3 meter cord to it (ha ha).

I am satisfied with the lens, I shoot on a crop, attention, and you can safely walk through the green areas :-)) Well, I don’t know, I never owned those lenses, and in this regard, it behaves somehow strangely, then 5 out of 5 photos are misses, then about 10 photos are right on target, I don’t understand what this is connected with yet :-( In general, for your money, it’s not a bad option, as a staffer will do quite well (unless, of course, you need such focal lengths), by putting it on a…

Like a typical amateur who rarely has a lot of money and pays exorbitant prices for elks they have no interest in, I needed a portrait painter (I know that the professionals will get excited and start branding me as an ignoramus, but don't, I know everything) for a crop that doesn't smear every other time and gives acceptable sharpness. To make a lengthy story short, I read some customer comments before committing to a purchase. An old pro remarked that it was so sharp that you could take a…

Got pros: Price, weight, compactness, smart and accurate focus, the possibility of manual fine-tuning. Cons below: Catches a hare from an on-camera flash with a diff when puffing on the forehead =) I haven’t noticed others yet

It was only by chance that I purchased it for the 5D Mark II, but I will not give it up! A good number of people have stated in their writing that the focal length of the lens is neither 35 mm nor 50 mm. In theory, they are successful as a result of this, but in practice, I believe their success is due to the fact that the distance is convenient. I bought it from that person for two thousand dollars, and it was in brand new condition. It came with a filter, a box, and a guarantee; in other…

In order to get from fr 50 to 1dm3, we required a repair. Because of the crop factor of 1.3, there were not many many options available; 35mm was out of the question, but 50mm was also too long. The number forty was selected as the winner. Efr 51mm - excellent. The glass has earned a lot of praise from me. Of course not the L series, but the picture has a high level of clarity, sharpness, and saturation. The autofocus performs flawlessly and practically does not blur at all. It would cost an…

A lot of optics and carcasses have been changed since the first camera, which was almost bought by accident. During this time, there has been a lot of change. He decided to remain. When I don't feel like lugging around a large number of lenses, I grab this one instead. Below it, a custom cropped carcass 650D that was purchased for this specific reason was placed. Despite the fact that a more serious 1D approach exists. Various pros: Light befitting a fairy tale! This effect was achieved with…

Even if you do not consider yourself to be an avid fan of portrait photography, it is essentially essential to have for an amateur owing to the combination of the cost and the optical properties of the lens. Soon, the older 50 f/1.8 lens will no longer be able to compete in the budget niche. I personally got rid of mine when I upgraded to a forty. Has pros: The picture quality is good, however there is occasionally a reduction in the dynamic range. In terms of focal length, there is virtually…

. and I don't even want to find something to criticize about this enchanted "pancake." Absolutely. You can complain about small geometry distortions, infrequent focus misses, and so on and so forth. Boring bores may notice the difficulties of manual focusing, "all-inclusive-for-free" lovers may complain about the lack of a stub, and you can complain about all of those things, too. You are aware of what? Do something else. Does manual focusing present any difficulties with the lens? Because of…

If you own a full-frame camera but are not willing to compromise on the size or quality of your zoom lenses, then this is the option for you: a staffer for every day that is bright, not too narrow, very lively, and has minimal distortion and sharpness. Even if you only shoot a minor event in your flat, it will always count as an additional one in the bag, even if it's only a still. On the other hand, if you already have a lens with a focal length of 35-50 millimeters, even if it isn't a USM…

I used exclusively Nikon cameras for the first year and a half of my photography career. A couple of months ago, I made the decision to experiment with and canon. I now only have one Canon DSLR camera, and it's an older model called the Canon 400D. I have a broken whale lens for it, with a range of 55-250 (2 pieces) with a 1.8 aperture at 50mm. In this preface, I want to make it very obvious that I am not a professional photographer nor a canonist; rather, I am merely a photography fan. Now…

Not a drawback, but keep in mind: on a full frame, 40 mm gives good distortion for large portraits, that is, it is more suitable for long shots, shooting groups of people, landscapes, etc. Even after buying zooms, there is no desire to get rid of it. Pros: Small size, minimal weight, acceptable sharpness, autofocus accuracy, excellent color reproduction in natural light and in pulsed light, no spherical distortion Cons: At first, it was very difficult to walk with manual focusing when shooting…

For an amateur, due to the combination of price and optical characteristics, it is practically a must-have, if you are not a categorical fan of portrait photography. Soon, the old 50 f / 1.8, which in my case I sold after buying a forty, will be forced out of the budget niche. Has pros: The picture is good, although sometimes it narrows the dynamic range. On the crop (I have 600d) there is almost a staff member in terms of focal length. They can shoot 90% of the stories. Everything is sharp…

"Pancake" - the so-called lenses of this type. Great for videographers, stepless smooth iris change. Photos are worthy of all praise in terms of sharpness, the quality is at L-class levels. Focusing is fast. For such a price, combined with the quality of the images, it can be put at the forefront of the entire Canon lens line. Pros below: Light weight, fast aperture, great price with very good sharpness Cons below: only nit-picking on small dimensions, because I'm used to large sizes. Yes, and…

Completely disappointed because I took it for the video. But still I’ll leave it for shooting with a stub, because it’s light. Perhaps the motor will be almost inaudible with a directional micro, this is hypothetical, I have not tried it yet. Pros: Compactness, lightness. Not a bad picture for a budget employee. Not bad as a photo lens. Got cons: Absolutely not suitable for shooting video if you use focus. Engine noise (STM) is very strong. Attention! The motor works even with manual focus!

Bought almost by accident, with the first camera, a lot of optics and carcasses have changed during this time. He stayed. When I don’t want to carry a lot of lenses with me, I take it. Under it, a specially cropped carcass 650D was bought for this purpose. Although there is a more serious 1D technique. Different pros: Fairy tale light! - from more expensive L lenses of older versions. There is no such thing at fifty dollars *. This is one of the most important factors for me now when I take…