Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-85mm F/3.5-4.5G ED VR Lens - White Box Review

For a long time I tried to adapt to 24-70 2.8 (4 years). I lost a bunch of interesting shots (either a shake, or a focal length of 70mm is not enough, and the long end on most lenses is not the sharpest). After buying 24-85 3.5 4.5, the top 24-70 has been idle for more than a year. Before this purchase, I often saved 70 -200 2.8, but with it it is not always possible to cover everything. Now it is less often used with all the ego's real virtues. 24-85 is very sharp at 800, focuses quickly. The…

Exploring my true thoughts.Perhaps I was unlucky with a copy, but after shooting a couple of months, 35-70, they gave him just a penny, and that means a lot.

With its pros: An excellent stabilizer, Weight and dimensions are excellent. Has cons: Almost succeeded, but at the extreme values ​​of the focal front, the focus was at one end, Here, now at 24 at a distance of 30 crop, And at 85

On the crop, https://fotki. https://fotki. https://fotki. Its pros: Uniform sharpness starting with open DFs along the entire length Has some cons: Sharpness (when viewing a frame at 100% magnification) is lower than fixes, but this is a drawback of all zooms, especially with respect to "budget" zooms.

What I want to say about this sample, for its price, it is ideal for Nikon crop cameras. Got pros: I used the old version, Value for money, the resolution is pretty good, and the lens itself is not afraid of backlight. With its cons: Of the minuses, vignetting and geometric distortions, According to the cut of the frame, it really soaps, and noticed that this is a defect, this did not occur.

On the crop, https://fotki. https://fotki. https://fotki. Pros below: Uniform sharpness starting with open DFs along the entire length Different cons: Sharpness (when viewing a frame at 100% magnification) is lower than fixes, but this is a drawback of all zooms, especially with respect to "budget" zooms.

about sharpness, aperture, bokeh, I'm talking about something else: when ordering in pixel 24, the consultant offered to pay extra for the selection, for the lack of back or front focus 800 wooden ones, apparently I don’t understand something, if I can’t use the purchased goods fully and immediately, every third lens goes for adjustment, this is normal ! I didn’t understand, what kind of business trade in notorious marriage is considered the norm! And the question, rather rhetorical, what kind

Now I take with me only a makrik and, sometimes, a telephoto. E. Aleinikov Some pros: An excellent stabilizer, which more than compensates for not the highest aperture ratio. Very fast focusing. Good color rendering. Detailing is top notch. Weight and dimensions are excellent. Its cons: Front-back focus did not allow for sharp pictures. Undertook to eliminate with the help of the camera. Almost succeeded, but at the extreme values ​​of the focal front, the focus was at one end, and the back at…

For such money - absolutely out of competition. Of course, it is strange to buy budget zooms for a full-frame camera for 60 ++ or more, but, surprisingly, the full matrix is ​​beyond praise. Its pros: excellent sharpness at all apertures and across the entire field. perfectly holds the oncoming sun. strong, reliable, solid metal, no plastic. Cons: quite noisy in operation, the focusing ring is tight, it moves in jerks. the focal length ring is also not a gift, it is unrealistic to make a smooth

What I want to say about this sample, for its price, it is ideal for Nikon crop cameras. Has some pros I used the old version, still without a stabilizer. What I want to say about him. Value for money, comfortable and light. Good color reproduction and the picture itself, amazing bokeh. On the plus side, the resolution is pretty good, and the lens itself is not afraid of backlight. Cons: Of the minuses, so here are three of them. Namely, vignetting and geometric distortions, although in the…

I shoot full frame. I took it relatively recently, but already managed to get out for serious shooting several times. I took it like glass for everyday architectural and landscape exercises, city panoramas, partly as travel and all that. For its tasks and at its price, the glass is very worthy. In the absence of any specific high requirements for aperture, bokeh, constructive, etc. - that's what you need. The workmanship also made a good impression, nothing rattles, does not stagger and does…

I bought a used one for 12 thousand and for this money it's just a super lens, there is no alternative, all sorts of Tamron and sigma are just rubbish. The sharpness in the open is just super, no worse than the fixes, the stabilizer works out at 100% the colors are very pleasant without the iron and pink on the d750. I am very pleased with the lens and I recommend it to everyone!

An interesting lens. The more I shoot with it, the more I like it. I shot nature at -24 degrees, the stabilizer worked fine, but for some reason the focus didn’t want to focus at close range of 24 mm. I shot it on the D800 RAV + Jeep. The lens coped with its duties. Not a single blurry shot. The video on it is of excellent quality. The fact that the lens rotates tightly from 24 to 85 is even better. Let me explain: you can set any focal lengths without fear that they will go astray (especially

I came across this miracle of technology along with the d610. Initially, I treated him with great skepticism because of the aperture ratio and cost. But after shooting with him in different conditions, I realized that the glass was more than successful. I would advise it as a universal travel zoom for amateur photographers))) Below I will leave a couple of photos from this glass. https://fotki. . Ru/next/users/dr-aparin/album/159247/view/596715 https://fotki.…

After getting acquainted with the subject, Tamron 28-75 / 2.8 and Sigma 24-70 / 2.8 went under the hammer. Nikon makes almost 100% of successful shots, and Tamron, and especially Sigma, nervously smoke on the sidelines, the number of misses in their autofocus can reach up to half. And in low light conditions, Nikon focuses much better than the above glasses with a larger hole.

I can note one thing that you need to adapt to shooting at a wide angle, 24 mm is still a wide angle in order to minimize geometric distortions. And if the frame is taken from the right point, then these distortions may not even be noticed, if desired, lr corrects them with one button. Even backlight holds surprisingly well. Before acquiring it, I wanted to buy a large, fast and expensive one - now I absolutely don’t want to. More than enough for a report, of course, having an APS matrix (not a

I used it on Nikon D300, the sharpness is no better than on the whale 18-105 for crop, I specifically compared them head-on, and it even seemed that 18-105 would be sharper (but maybe this is purely on my copy) and what will happen on the full frame? I think it’s generally terrible, because on the crop the edges of poor sharpness are cut off and it will be completely terrible, it’s not worth it, only if you go with the camera, you shouldn’t take it separately at all, although many say that the…

I switched to NIKON from the second brand of a well-known company, where I had a 24-105 / 4 - a good lens, it gave sharpness at 5-ke. This lens came with a camera. At first I thought it was just a plug, but when I tried it, I was shocked, it is no worse than 24-105, and in some respects it turned out to be better - weight, size. I set f5 and shoot the reportage without any problems. Blurring the background at 85 / 4.5 suits me quite well when shooting a reportage, and in the studio I set it to…

Whoever expects landscape sharpness and portrait bokeh from this lens is not your option. In the picture, this lens is the most ordinary - there are not enough stars from the sky, but it gives a stable and predictable result! One word - kit. I bought a BU, as a universal one (14,000 for 2019), for traveling and walking light. I take it either as the main lens, or as an additional one to one of the fixes. As a lens "just in case" or "for all occasions", it is very good - accurate autofocus, the