Review

I took it for 7k, and for this price - just a miracle. The lens that gives me the most emotion. Yes, maybe it produces a picture worse than lenses for 60k +, but how much worse is it? Compared in the store with Panasonic 45-150, 45-175 and 45-200, I would not say that they are better in the picture. The lens is very light, you can take it everywhere with you. Suddenly for someone it will be important: For a year and a half, nothing happened to the plastic mount. I got caught in the rain…

copies, understand the manufacturer at all: for the classic 4/3 and now the price has been raised, and the quality is worse than any other manufacturer: for canon, nikon and sony, of course, whale televisions also have their drawbacks,

Took 09202222, new for 9 https://fotki. With its pros: Sharp, some reason not everywhere) Based on the weight and size, you can always carry with you. Has some cons: Of course, I would like a metal mount and a lens hood in the kit.

I got it as a whale - that is, it came with the OM-D E-M10 as a second one, in addition to the standard 14-42 already worse, but also aperture 4 - although it's a sin to complain, faster lenses cost 3-4 but this is not a disadvantage of the lens, but of the micro 4/3 system - in fact, the lens is not 40-150, but 80-300 The design is plastic, a good lens, but it is better to take it as a set with the device, separately - expensive, almost half the cost of the Olympus E-M10 similar zooms with…

Got pros: compact size, very light, as an amateur I appreciate the sharpness and picture, zooms in well With its cons. some complain about fragility due to plastic, but in several trips and careful use I did not find any problems

The lens is optically not bad, but the quality of the plastic is deplorable! The price for the lens is not justified high! The same Nikon, Canon or Sony makes better optics for less money! I bought used I did not expect such low quality materials from Olympus! Has some pros Pretty small for a TV! Silent and fast af, light, that's all the advantages! Strangely enough, the sharpness is good, unlike 14-42 mm f3,5-5,6 IIR With its cons. The price does not match the quality! The quality of the…

An excellent lens as a spare to the width, very light, but perhaps this is an ordinary whale, with its pros and cons, I still recommend buying lighter lenses, this lens is well suited for the countries of the Middle East and other southern countries where there is an abundance of light, especially good noted by lovers of filming in safari (without extreme) animals. For professionals and advanced amateurs, there is no point in taking it, save up for the pro version right away, since buying this…

I got it for 6500, the first impression when opening the box is small. The second is weightless. The third one is new! There is plastic all around, but it is so fitted, and of such quality that it’s a sin to complain - iron didn’t even stand next to it! (if you think about the weight, the cost of this weight and, God forbid, rust) Before buying, I was interested in the details of the design, I thought about the mount . Plastic! But there are no negative emotions - it can easily be stronger than

One of my favorite lenses, after a year and a half of use (and how did it live so long, with such and such mounts!) A crack appeared near one screw, called the service - the voice on the phone answered very reluctantly that yes, maybe for 8 thousand change, it’s not known yet, maybe I pulled everything out myself and the case is not guaranteed + you need to send it for a month from St. Petersburg to Hong Kong time. They also said that they would change it again to plastic, but what for I need…

I really like the lens, despite the shortcomings in the design and materials. Although the zoom ring could have been made rubber, it would have been more practical in my opinion. I wrote the price as a plus, since I bought the PEN Portrait Zoom kit (lens, 8 GB flash card, blue Olympus Pen photo bag) for less than 6 I recommend it to everyone as a good, inexpensive addition to any kit lens except 14-150.

I liked the work of this lens: it focuses quickly, gives a sharp, contrasting, saturated picture. Excellent FR range: 80-300mm. It wins a lot compared to DSLR counterparts due to its compactness and weight, it easily fits as a second and third in a small photo bag. It has a relatively large diameter of the front lens (58 mm), which adds naturalness to the image, while maintaining good aperture (5.6 at the long end). Convenient wide zoom ring.

there is no sharpness on these lenses. there were about 5-6 copies, I tried to find an acceptable one. I don’t understand the manufacturer at all: for the classic 4/3 there were excellent lenses for these focal lengths. and the one with ED glass, and the usual one. and hoods were included. and now the price has been raised, and the quality is worse than any other manufacturer: for canon, nikon and sony, of course, whale televisions also have their drawbacks, but they are significantly ahead of…

I've been using it for over a month. Very good for sports photography. Convenient to zoom. Great for sharpening. Camera Olympus EM-5. I'm thinking about Panas 40-200, but so far I'm happy with this handsome man. It extends far, which surprises everyone who thinks about Olympus that this is a soap dish. And this is a great camera. It also has lenses of 17 mm, 45 mm and 75 mm and that's it, you are packed to the eyeballs. Everything can be removed. I recommend this lens to both amateurs and…

I shoot with a Panasonic Lumix G3. I really liked the lens, I took it from the hands of trusted people from the forum for only 4500. Came in perfect new condition, without any scuffs, scratches and erasing marks, fully working. Prior to that, he had only kit Panasonic Lumix 14-42 mm and Panasonic 45-200 mm. Both of these lenses are frankly soapy compared to the "Olik" 40-150 - it is really sharp, every brick stands out on the building, even from afar. For Lumix owners, you can shoot handheld…

I've been using it for two years. After a break in photography, I recently took him on a photo walk - as a result, I finally decided to pay tribute to this creation, at least within this framework. I will say one thing - it is much more convenient and easier to use than whale. Work on approximation performs as it should - you do not notice a single negative point. Yes, sometimes you have to wait a little to focus at the maximum, but it seems that the matter is in the focus area - I don’t bother

I took a slightly used one under warranty for 9,000. Used on Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Olympus E-PL7 cameras. Before buying, I compared point-blank with Panasonic 45-150 on OM-D E-M5 - Olympus turned out to be an order of magnitude sharper and its detail was much higher. There was a feeling that Panasonic does not cover the resolution of the Olympus matrix, although it may have come across such a copy. Great lens, worth the money. Highly recommend to anyone who has never had a telephoto lens.