- solid dignity
- Could not find
- A fast computer, vibrant images, and a high-quality camera
- Undetected throughout a trial run of three months
- OLED display
- awfully slow
- Screen quality is superb, and the colors are reproduced vividly. High endurance during online browsing without the need for a charger (watching videos for the most part). Exemplaryness in terms of photography. Fast printing speeds are achieved. Of course, it also helps that the phone itself has a classy design.
- Samsung has a lot of invasive apps, but it isn't a dealbreaker for me; I wouldn't rate the phone much lower because of it. You have the option to prevent certain programs from starting automatically.
- Lovely phone, arrived swiftly, and packaging included all necessary safety stickers.
- There are no Bixby scripts.
- Screen, cameras, battery, smart memory, under-glass scanner, triple slot (2 SIM + MicroSD), reasonably affordable price, ability to receive any GPS signal (in addition to the standard ones plus Galileo and Canoe), multi-band wifi, NFC, and 4G. Gorgeous architecture and a gorgeous sky.
- 1) The device without a case was repeatedly unlocked in the pocket due to the unlock functions for events and when picking up being disabled only after restarting and prodding them; blocking via fingerprint and face recognition did not help either (on the lock screen, everything that was possible and in dialer printed heresy). 2) 90Hz consumes the screen and does not function in all programs. 3) A significant amount (about 30) of 2022 garbage (well, this is in accordance with the [censored] law), and 3 system-level components that can only be deleted with adb without root access. 4) Plenty of criticism from Samsung and Google (again, removing adb to help). 5) Limited palette of colors. 6) No case is comprised. 7) The entire paperclip is really straightforward and bendable. 8) There is no optical stabilization for images or movies, and the photo quality is not visible at night (although this also applies to the A52 and A72) (there is software, most often it copes). There appear to be 48 MP or fewer in reality, and 64 MP with soft processing. There are many features, including continuous shooting, that are unavailable in wide-angle, 64 MP, and some other modes.
- The screen itself is decent, but the rest of the package stinks. It never stops hanging, the transitions are painfully slow, and it plainly does not have time to ponder about the reasons behind your choices. And considering I'm not much of a player at the moment, your guess is probably very accurate.
- The impression that you use some piece of cheap trash rather than a phone that costs 20,000 dollars. It acts like a kind of trash for social networks and search engines, slowing down their performance.
- Display is roughly equivalent to the standard. - More than a day of use can be gotten out of the battery. - Lightweight
- Decreases overall performance, including the shell, camera, and apps The camera isn't very good, and you'll have to use your phone to see the results. The graininess and blurriness are glaringly obvious on the big screen. If you take a snapshot in low light, you can safely dispose of it without worrying about any repercussions. The smart screen is poorly designed; it constantly glows in your pocket and disconnects calls.
- Great presentation The first design that does not strain the eyes and features four cameras (just like any other Poco device), as well as everything else (good)
- 1. pointless 90 hertz because it causes lag even when swiping, and not just within applications but also on the home screen. 2. an extremely underpowered processor; if it began to experience performance issues one month after being purchased, I shudder to think about what will become of it after one full year of use. 3. The phone should absolutely have a case and at the very least a protective film, but the package does not include either of these items. 4. a powerful battery that can hold its charge for the longest amount of time possible (according to my observations, from 0 to 100 it takes about 2.5 hours to charge) 5. Initially, I went with a marriage, but it seems that the sensor that determines whether the phone is leaning against my ear or not is malfunctioning, and as a result, my phone from the first day of purchase could simply not allow itself to be used (the screen did not respond to pressing). The only thing that helped was a forced reboot; I wore it in the center of the weiner, and they threw it off to the factory and sent it home:)))). I had a hunch that the issue was related to the sensor because I was able to solve the problem by turning off the function that turns the screen off when the phone is in a pocket; however, this has resulted in the phone turning on by itself when it is in my pocket and taking hundreds of random photos that need to be deleted. After using it for three months, I've come to the conclusion that the only solution is to get my money back and either purchase a refurbished iPhone or the most basic model of Google's Pixel smartphone. This ugliness is just too difficult to work with.
- Not
- Freezes over and over again. The use of a fingerprint is impossible for a number of reasons.
- Display Battery Charge Time and Capacity Layout
- Scanner that reads fingerprints
- Battery, Screen, and Tap.
- A measure of the size.
- Batteries for a decent camera
- touchscreen sluggish
- Appearance
- The phone started to malfunction a month after purchase and was eventually thought to be completely unusable.
- Excellent battery life, color reproduction, and 4k, 60 fps video. Everything.
- The camera (application) frequently crashes, the screen (the picture is of great quality, but the percentage is loaded), and for the first four months of use, there were three warranty repairs.
- Screen that is rich, large, and bright. Excellent autonomy
- weak iron Errors, slowdowns, and app crashes
- cameras, processor, great design, memory, hertz, and display!
- For me, there are simply no drawbacks.