Sony 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 FE OSS Standard 📷 Zoom Lens - High-Quality Interchangeable Lens for Exceptional Photography Review

I use this lens with a Sony A5100 camera. So far only at home, with cats. But it was with them that I noticed good stabilization, color reproduction and sharpness. I used to use the regular 16-50, after which I had to edit all the photos, and often add sharpness. For example, one photo. Focus 57 (85 equivalent) mm, aperture f/5, ISO 2022, shutter speed 1/40 s. There is only a slight reduction in noise during processing. In my opinion, at ISO 2022, such a small amount of noise is simply…

Has pros: Staff for most full-frame cameras of the Sony a7 sensitivity) brought back a lot of high-quality, sharp, with good color reproduction, and a6000 cameras. Got cons: in the direction of improvement, are sometimes quite significant.

Pros below: Well assembled, but it's only surprising if you switch from crop cameras. Has cons: I had 2 But both had soap on the edges of the frame even at f8! Even their own inexpensive fifty dollars, which is similar in materials and price, is much better in terms of picture quality.

Budget travel zoom with autofocus and optical stabilizer, for a quite adequate, not space (like most Sony lenses) price. Especially useful for beginners and not too pretentious photographers. Got pros: Staff for most full-frame cameras of the Sony a7 family. Suitable for most beginners and experienced hobbyists. Good in good lighting. A good picture indoors when shooting photos and videos indoors due to high-quality ISO (light sensitivity). He showed himself well on a trip to the Arctic Circle,

I won't recommend buying it. I got it as a whale with a carcass, and therefore not particularly upset with the money spent. I will sell, for sure. Sony has never really pleased photographers with its whales. Has some pros Compactness. Considering the huge shortage of available glasses for the E mount, you are just glad that the lens is without an adapter. Autofocus seems to suit, silent. The lens hood is removed easily, the elastic bands are pleasant, without backlash. With its cons. The stub…

Summarizing, we can say this: tightly sewn, but okay tailored. Pros below: There are no backlashes of the trunk, focus and zoom rings. Dust and moisture protection, there is a sealing cuff in the gap between the trunk and the body. The trunk moves out by about 1 cm in the 28 mm position, at 40 mm the trunk is completely removed, then when the focal length of 70 mm is reached, it is extended by 1 cm. I can say for sure that without covering the apertures, it is in sufficient quantity, the…

I use this lens for video shooting, sometimes for photos, of course, fr is very small, 24-105 is an ideal solution, but it costs more than 1k euros. The lens is not bad, at 70 mm and 5.6 aperture, just right for portraits, slightly soapy 😀. But after a year of use, I started having problems, at 28-30 mm when shooting video when zooming, you can see how the vignetting correction disappears, and for a moment the picture dances on the sides, and only at a wide angle. I suspect that the problem is

Starting from F9, it starts to crawl with focus and focuses for a long time. A bunch of HA, distortion, smeared edges, vignetting. The focal range of 28-70 is so-so, it would be better if they did 18 - 35 F5 than this, it still lathers wildly at F3.5. I never shoot with this glass at 50 and 70mm, for this any fix will be much better, even the cheapest one. But for the money, how much it costs, this is a good glass to start, or take a picture where you need good quality but the budget is…

Robust Reliable Basically a whale like a whale Great for video shooting Stub holds up well So little about optics I have not written yet How could I miss such a moment . his competitor, the hare 24-70 / 4, is, in principle, better only in 2 cases 1) 4 on the entire segment 2) holds back, but it is with a lower resolution Those. if 4 and backlight are not relevant to you, then take this lens without a drop of doubt. She justifies herself 100%

In general, I am satisfied with the glass, autofocus strains, in comparison with the EOS 6D + 24-70 / 4 LIS is much slower and not more confident. Perhaps this is a feature of the camera. I took the camera for video and manual fixes. I was pleased with the lens hood in the kit, the sharpness is not razor-sharp, but very good, I expected the worst. The geometry is not perfect, there is a vignette, but everything is easily solved in LR profiles. The lens surprised me with resistance to counter, I

I took it exclusively for autofocus in video in a pair with Sonya a7-3. All other lenses that I use are much more expensive and it was amazing to get such a picture on a whale. I used to consider whales on canons and nikons to be garbage before buying the first normal glass. On this whale you can shoot (both photos and videos) anything. The idea of ​​​​buying this particular glass was taken from the operators of the academician.

Convenient for shooting video. With a little stretch (taking into account the indicated shortcomings), you can use it for wedding photography. If there is nothing else at hand, you can even take a portrait, landscape, whatever . I took it for myself (on the A7M3) just for video and for photos as an inexpensive universal staffer for random scenes (on vacation) and as a replacement for fixes (35-28mm) for episodic shooting, if a 55mm fix cannot be used (indoors) or "the soul demands" a wider…

Previously, he worked on canon with L-series zooms - 24-70 2.8, 24-105 4, as well as tamron 24-70 2.8. And after them, I'm not dumb to use this lens for professional purposes. Still, this is already modern glass, and it looks good against the background of its professional competitors. As I already said, the sharpness at the edges is excellent, on all my Kenon copies everything was worse there. I am attaching some photos of it.

I regret buying it. It would be better to take a carcass, and then I bought a lens with a variable focal length. At first, I sinned on the E-Mount mount (compared to M, it is "flat"). But after using the Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 35mm f/2.8 and two adapters for A and M mounts, where the lenses are rigid even through the adapter, I realized that this was a drawback of the lens itself. His "boot". And this does not apply only to my lens. I tried it in stores on several copies - everywhere axial

Economical glass. Good image quality, light and a great versatile lens. I have a number of highly rated Sony and third-party lenses, both Prime and Zoom, and aside from the pixelated looks, the image quality is fairly comparable. For everyday photography, this is perhaps my favorite lens.

I bought this lens to use as an extra angle for wedding videos - I needed something with autofocus (it's a drone camera) and enough zoom range to to allow different image settings. I also use it occasionally for simple travel videos (hiking, boating, family fun) and it does the job well. The variable aperture isn't ideal for indoor shooting (video or photos) of course, but for the price it's a good workhorse for outdoor video, especially personal use.

I bought this lens to use on my Sony A6000. Its performance corresponds to the price. I don't really want the Sony 24-70z because it's only 1 notch faster. Judging by various reviews, Zeiss is not much better, but it is expensive. 28-70 equals 42-105mm (equivalent to 35mm), which is very versatile. I sometimes use it with a Sony VCL-DH1758 teleconverter and it extends the range to 184mm (equivalent to 35mm) which isn't bad for some medium telephotos. For a wider angle I have the 24mm f1.8 z…