💎 Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Portrait Lens (SEL50F18/B) Review: A Black Gem for Captivating Portraits Review

Candid feedback on this product.after reading reviews here, I bought not the A6000 whale, one of the few lenses that I would recommend to friends

Unveiling my candid assessment.Got pros: I have in conjunction with the A6000 Well put together. Some cons: resolution is about 12 megapixels, but I would like all 24

Purchased in addition to Sony a6000 I have never left a bad impression about myself, everything is always sharp and hits, in general,

I shoot goods with this lens for my online store, it turned out that I sell used Minolta af and Sony A lenses for Sony Alpha, I send cash on delivery throughout the country! But it is this lens that I use when I need to remove the condition of the goods, go here I recommend it to anyone who needs a good lens on the Sony Nex, the rest are too expensive.

I took it after I played with the manual Helios-44 Working aperture f / 1.8 4, shutter speed 1/10 vs. 1/50, well, I didn’t use half-lengths from Canon and Nikon, but I saw pictures from them in the open, the subject definitely makes them in the open, originals saved, EXIF ​​too

With its pros. excellent sharpness at a fully open aperture of 1.8 . beautiful bokeh, very quiet operation Has cons: just like all half-lengths, it often smears - it is corrected by setting the central focus point, XA are the same as on half-tones 1,8 and 1,4 from a DSLR

Purchased in addition to Sony a6000 at the beginning of June this year. During the entire period of operation, I have never left a bad impression about myself, everything is always sharp and hits, in general, I strongly recommend it as the most wonderful portrait lens for the money. Bought in one well-known store at a perfectly reasonable price Pros below: - very sharp - does not chromate - always hits very accurately and without misses - excellent design - nice appearance With its cons.…

If there is no money for 35, then 50 is the same. It's worth spending money on. After all, it is beautiful for a portrait and for many other things. By the way, his bokeh is very interesting, if the background allows . there will be a beautiful picture Got pros: robust and reliable design in principle working 1.8 stabilizer good both for photo and video shooting (in principle, I didn’t shoot much with it in the manual, but why if there was enough autofocus where necessary) Has some cons…

in my opinion, the best E-mount lens I've tried (except for Zeiss ones, I don't have them). I always take it with me, even on trips. Sharpness in the center is excellent, soft portrait drawing to the waist, which does not require fine-tuning in Photoshop. I don’t take full-length and group photos with him - there is a small depth of field on an open hole, someone is definitely out of focus. If you clamp the aperture, then there is no point in this lens, set it to 18-55 or 16-50, you will get…

I wanted fifty dollars for a long time, I used to shoot on a manual takumar of the 70s through an adapter, but I decided, now, to please myself. I can't say enough good things about the lens. Strong HA, it focuses very uncertainly and slowly (this generally applies to the Nexus, but especially with fifty dollars), and therefore I shoot in DMF mode in low light or special scenes - and here the large stroke of the focus ring is very annoying - while there is no distance scale . It catches some…

After the firmware upgrade, autofocus began to work quickly and clearly, even the very cool Eye-AF and Lock-on AF. When focusing over a wide zone, the front focus is consistently small, but when choosing the central zone, everything is accurate. In general, the picture quality is good. It is, how to say it - just good, without any special emotions. Bokeh is blurred well, sharpness and contrast are reduced on an open hole, especially at the edge of the frame, which is good for portraits…

The nex 5 camera and this glass are no worse than the nikon D90 + 35mm 1.8 DSLR, the difference in focusing speed, but I’m not going to catch the moment the arrow takes off from the crossbow))) I’ve been an amateur photographer for 12 years, I went through everything from soap dishes to good DSLRs, I understand about than I say. It’s worth its money, I took exactly for a gold piece - a little expensive, I would like it to be cheaper, but glasses of the same quality on a mirror cost the same.…

The presence of a stub makes this glass unique. Night, bars and concerts are his element, you can shoot hand-held at 1/10. I also want to note the bokeh, which is soft, unlike Nikon's D-fifties, and at the same time with character, unlike Nikon's G-fifties. It is very reminiscent of the blur in Minolta 50mm 1.7, while you can cover the hole up to 2.8 - the nuts start only from 3.2. Good glass, I recommend.