Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 111
  • 5
    65
  • 4
    9
  • 3
    13
  • 2
    12
  • 1
    12

Type of review

In reality, it turned out to be larger than it seemed in the photo. When specifying a 5 Ghz access point in the settings for automatic channel selection, there were problems connecting a 2022 MacBook to it - the access point was simply not visible. Google Pixel 3a connected properly, i. E. The problem is more with the Mac. Got pros: Moderately spartan in appearance. Transmitter power - in 5 Ghz mode, it confidently hits through two reinforced concrete walls without noticeable losses even at 50%

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Beyond praise! The product definitely deserves your attention.

To upgrade from my previous LinkSys WRT-160, I decided to purchase it around a month ago. He labored conscientiously for ten years, but when the power went out, he started hanging himself. Requirements: wired and wireless Internet access at Khrushchev's treshka, as well as port forwarding from the Internet to provide web-based access to the network attached storage (NAS). Without any instructions, I was able to connect and configure everything in a quarter of an hour. The user interface of the…

Pros
  • Excellent signal. Simple and natural set-up procedures. Mounting on the wall is a breeze. It more than meets my requirements, which is saying a lot. Configuration options that are distinct for each WiFi range
Cons
  • Despite the fact that it begins functioning the moment it is removed from the packaging, a flashing is necessary. Even a flashed one brings the network to a standstill for a few of minutes once modifications are saved in the settings (an exception is changes in the poppy filter lists). Installation of automatic channels, a hike, and lack of intelligence. exposes for some reason the channel with the worst programming.

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsatisfactory, upset with this product.

Excellent value in terms of the hardware. It would appear that the program itself is the source of all of my issues. Complete, it functions, and the scheduler will restart it at 5:00 in the morning (so as not to see the hanging PPOE session). I would go back to using the DIR-320 if it weren't for the fact that I need Wi-Fi that operates at 5GHz and ports that are capable of gigabit speeds. At the very least, the DIR-320 can download torrents at a rate that is greater than 8.5 MB per second…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

Very pleased. Before that there was a TP link. This is heaven and earth. The signal is everywhere. (Apartment 67 meters) Speed ​​does not cut. It does not crash during power outages.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A nice option for the money, one of the best deals.

Router is great. Set and forget. For 2 Wi-FI bands + gigabit ports, it's cheap and cheerful. If not for some comments of feeble-minded people, I would have taken it earlier. There is nothing to write about your marriage here. Here they write about working devices! They would also write that they didn’t get enough sleep and want to see their mother. And the diodes are all on fire here, and the power is with a margin, and the firmware is immediately in 2022!

Pros
  • Two bands, powerful antennas (2-3 times more powerful than tp-link 1042 and DIR-300). The first router that regularly distributes Wi-FI throughout my three-ruble note. Gigabit ports (will come in handy later). Automatic IP-TV support on all ports. Lightweight firmware - does not tupit + easy to manage.
Cons
  • The Internet does not steal from neighbors, I had to pay my own))

Revainrating 2 out of 5

A little disappointed, a bad purchase.

I tried the firmware on the site. Tried changing the power supply. Cooling added. No effect. I did not find alternative firmware. Iron is clearly weak. Ideal for an undemanding user with a small number of devices (up to 3)

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Not at all what I expected.

I have been using for several years. Periodically, about once a day, the connection of both the cable and wi-fi falls off. The router just disappears for 15 seconds, and then reappears, and so on several times in a row. After that, everything works until the end of the day. The firmware was ated by V2.2.43243.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Do not hesitate to buy, the quality is amazing for the price.

Of course, it’s difficult to recommend a Chinese for whom you won’t find wrt firmware, but if you just want to have stable Internet at home and connect to either 2.4 or 5 GHz, this is probably the best option. . Well, a year has passed with this router. at the moment there are no new claims to it, it works like clockwork, from DAmazon services, port forwarding. what is missing is the ability to get into the firmware, I still want more control from the smart home behind the router, but this is…

Pros
  • performs its tasks with brilliance. does not hang (l2tp mode) breaks through two main walls. There is a mode of scheduled reboots, but so far it has not come in handy.
Cons
  • not available for this price

Revainrating 2 out of 5

A little disappointed, a bad purchase.

At the time of Roskompozor, there was no VPN client - I didn’t even think about it when I bought a router! You have to connect from client devices, which is very inconvenient. Periodically, all (wired and wireless) devices stop resolving addresses, although there is a ping up to conditional 8.8.8.8. After rebooting the router, work is restored. For some reason, the regular way to send video via DLNA ("transfer to device" -> TV) stopped working on Windows. But with the "Home Media Server" it…

Pros
  • Transmitter power, gigabit ports, price
Cons
  • Amazon server failure, no VPN

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Just a terrible product, very upset.

Think before you take. Please note that the firmware is raw. There were three attempts to configure this router with BEELINE. It cannot connect directly to it. (automatic protocol with dynamic IP). MI BOX version 4 and stick sees the 5 GHz network, with very narrow settings for the channel width and the channel itself (dance with 4 tambourines). At the same time, on channel 46 5 GHz - wifi caught Mac mini 2022, in which only 2.4 - Miracles and nothing more. I wanted to connect it through the…

Pros
  • Democratic appearance.
Cons
  • Does not work with various devices on the 5 Hz band. Problems with wi-fi. Problem with Xiaomi mi box s. Resets all settings when flashing. Does not work with BEELINE Home Internet. Weak 5 GHz signal. General crookedness

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

I changed the router inherited from the operator, after a year of work, the machine gave up and went out. I chose from inexpensive gigabit ac-standard routers. In fact, the choice is small: asus, netis, mikrotik. If we take the parameters Price / Quality / Functionality, then this device wins unequivocally: 5GHz, gigabit LAN on four ports and the minimum cost for such functionality

Pros
  • Price, thoughtful interface, IPTV without problems with settings. Made soundly, there is no high-frequency "squeak" (annoyed on the old router). The 2.4 and 5 GHz bands can be configured differently
Cons
  • in the 5 GHz band, the signal is sensitive to walls and obstacles

I took it to replace the old TP-Link WR740, because Gigabit ports were needed for the local area network and with an eye to the future of Wi-Fi AC. He copes with the assigned tasks perfectly well. It heats up a little stronger than the previous router, but the filling is more powerful here. Speed ​​does not cut. The signal of the wireless network confidently distributes throughout the apartment. By WI-FI in N mode on a laptop, I squeezed out a speed of 90 Mbps, on TP-Link it was possible to…

Pros
  • Normally works. Set everything up once and forget about it.
Cons
  • The design is bad in my opinion. Small glitches in the web interface (the first time I didn’t want to save the binding of ip-addresses for some devices, reboot helped)

A month ago I bought it to replace the old LinkSys WRT-160. He faithfully worked for 10 years and began to hang after the power went out. Needs: wired and wireless Internet in Khrushchev's treshka + port forwarding from the Internet to access the NAS via the web. I connected and configured everything in half an hour without instructions. The web interface is quite simple and clear. After installing the new device, everything immediately became good with the signal. In neighboring rooms…

Pros
  • Good signal. Intuitive ease of setup. Ease of wall mounting. Satisfies my needs with a margin. Separate settings for each WiFi range
Cons
  • Although it works immediately, being taken out of the box, but a flashing is required. Even a flashed one, when saving changes in the settings, puts the network down for a couple of minutes (an exception is changes in the poppy filter lists). Automatic channel installation, hike, not intelligent. Exposes for some reason the most crap channel

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing I've ever used, I recommend it to everyone!

I bought to replace the half-dead Linksys, from which I expected a lot more. I took the "Chinese" because it was cheap and time was running out. Didn't guess. Now I advise others. Pros: - MIMO - 4 physical external antennas - reliable as an ax and simple as an ax. bought, turned on, working - does not stand like an airplane wing Haven't even had to reboot yet! Different cons: During the exploitation - I did not find it. Well, OK, he doesn’t break through a three-room apartment in a KOPE series…

This is the second Netis 2780 that I have owned. The first one has been operational for a good number of years. The flight will be like any other, so I decided to take the second one. As a point of comparison, there was another Dlink-615 running in parallel; it is still functional, despite the fact that it is rather outdated and underpowered. When it came time to purchase a new router, I also looked into D-Link options. But, my primary router was an ASUS RT-N65U, and I have decided that ASUS is

Pros
  • Wi-Fi throughout the entire three-room flat, a network with 1 Gigabit of capacity, IPTV, and cost.
Cons
  • The web interface has some issues that need to be fixed. A 5Hz network hidden behind a wall of concrete is significantly slower.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is the most common, it could be worse.

I was seduced by rave reviews and characteristics on the site, everything seems to be fine. But with an increase in the number of devices in the apartment (2 stationary PCs, a laptop, a set-top box, a TV with Smart TV, 4 phones) and more frequent stay at home, the periodic absence of the Internet has recently become annoying. I did a lot of work with the provider, I even had to replace it, they changed the cable, the port on the operator's switch (by the way, the operator's port is 100 FD)…

Pros
  • Easy setup, gigabit ports, dual band
Cons
  • Regular Internet dumps towards the provider, about once a week, sometimes more often. For some reason, it is treated only by physically disabling the Wan port. There are no comments on the part of the provider, errors on the port do not accumulate, they changed the cable, even replaced the provider, nothing helps. The latest firmware. The WIFI signal at 5GHz in the next room is already very weak, there are no neighbors when analyzing the bandwidth.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Impressions from the purchase are good, buy.

I recommend it for use on personal PCs and mobile devices. It is in one's best interest to select specific devices that offer a greater number of configurable settings. It is unfortunate that it was discovered to be incompatible with the Yandex station because I thought the router was very great. It wasn't compatible with anything else, so I had to get a new one! (( The benefits of it include: The price, the fact that it has two bands, the ease with which it can be set up, the reliability and…